JAPAN IS unified in Minimum Income Support social policy. Russia is unified. France is unified. The Euro English are unified. China is unified. Isn't it unusual that the alleged leader of the free world is not unified in social policy concerning the universal unconditional minimum income support. His country divided and many citizens are left as fodder. If you were an industrial sheep farmer, would you let some sheep graze on the mountain side and the other sheep enjoy the automatic distillation of the corn in the traugh? Some sheep are not prepared to participate in the market sales. The lack of unified policy on that farm is a waste of time really. Those mountain fed sheep are stuck on the farm and the other sheep have gone back to Africa or the West Indies or Europe but they look and feel good and are worthy participants in your global economy, using their daily corn Minimum Income Support cards every day as issued by the government dispensing about $800.00 per day. If you don't take your corn on that day with your card, then you miss that day's bread. The point of Civic 19 is about cleanliness. It also says you are not in absolute control. It also said that if you don't follow, you would not be accepted when and if you did not participate, if you did not obey. It also says you were told to implement a universal unconditional minimum income support, (put on a shirt and shoes before you come into McDonald's)...to be clean and pay for cleaning supplies so we can all be safe and social in our social connections and wear a tongue condom for your burgers, burrito and big franchise coffee. You need to fall in soldier! We are all soldiers now son and how can you be a king if you don't save your own people from the disruptive technologies or from the Civic 19? It will help if you follow the way of the kings and implement a sales tax of no less than 30% and a universal unconditional minimum income support of no less than $60,000.00 per year per citizen. This is the way of kings in response to the disruptive power of automation that can cause joblessness and it is the way to respond to Civic 19. Yet, you implemented something that disenfranchised people that had been disrupted at no fault of their own in terms of employment maybe two or three years ago who have not worked or earned any sum of money since and were on EI (Employment Insurance) due to automation and robotification although EI was not enough to satisfy the requirements of a UNIVERSAL UNCONDITIONAL MINIMUM INCOME SUPPORT. Is there a reason why you want to imagine being the leader of the free world but have policies that are indicative of genocide?

 JAPAN IS  unified in Minimum Income Support social policy. Russia is unified.  France is unified.  The Euro English are unified.  China is unified.  Isn't it unusual that the alleged leader of the free world is not unified in social policy concerning the universal unconditional minimum income support.   His country divided and many citizens are left as fodder.  If you were an industrial sheep farmer, would you let some sheep graze on the mountain side and the other sheep enjoy the automatic distillation of the corn in the traugh?  Some sheep are not prepared to participate in the market sales.  The lack of unified policy on that farm is a waste of time really.  Those mountain fed sheep are stuck on the farm and the other sheep have gone back to Africa or the West Indies or Europe  but they look and feel good and are worthy participants in your global economy, using their daily corn Minimum Income Support cards every day as issued by the government dispensing about $800.00 per day. If you don't take your corn on that day with your card, then you miss that day's bread. The point of Civic 19 is about cleanliness.  It also says you are not in absolute control.  It also said that if you don't follow, you would not be accepted when  and if you did not participate, if you did not obey.    It also says you were told to implement a universal unconditional minimum income support, (put on a shirt and shoes before you come into McDonald's)...to be clean and  pay for cleaning supplies so we can all be safe and social in our social connections and wear a tongue condom for your burgers, burrito and big franchise coffee.  You need to fall in soldier!  We are all soldiers now son and how can you be a king if you don't save your own people from the disruptive technologies or from the Civic 19?   It will help if you follow the way of the kings and implement a sales tax of no less than 30% and a universal unconditional minimum income support of no less than $60,000.00 per year per citizen.  This is the way of kings in response to the disruptive power of automation that can cause joblessness and it is the way to respond to Civic 19.   Yet, you implemented something that disenfranchised people that had been disrupted at no fault of their own  in terms of employment maybe two or three years ago who have not worked or earned any sum of money  since and were on EI (Employment Insurance)  due to automation and robotification although EI was not enough to satisfy the requirements of a UNIVERSAL UNCONDITIONAL MINIMUM INCOME SUPPORT.   Is there a reason why you want to imagine being the leader of the free world but have policies that are indicative of genocide?   


   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment