Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

The idea of regularizing the verb avoir—using the infinitive form "avoir" (or a fixed root) across all grammatical persons instead of conjugated forms like avons, avez, or ont—addresses a core topic in linguistics: morphological simplification and language constructivism. Simplifying irregular verb conjugations is a well-studied pathway for making languages easier to learn, teach, and spread globally. Below is an examination of how this proposal functions in terms of language acquisition, linguistic history, and practical communication; one verb. Click here.

 The idea of regularizing the verb avoir —using the infinitive form "avoir" (or a fixed root) across all grammatical persons instead of conjugated forms like avons , avez , or ont —addresses a core topic in linguistics: morphological simplification and language constructivism . Simplifying irregular verb conjugations is a well-studied pathway for making languages easier to learn, teach, and spread globally. Below is an examination of how this proposal functions in terms of language acquisition, linguistic history, and practical communication; one verb.  Click here.  1. Advantages for Language Acquisition and Dissemination Reduction of Cognitive Load: French is famous for its complex verbal paradigms. The auxiliary verb avoir has highly irregular present tense forms ( j'ai, tu as, il a, nous avons, vous avez, ils ont ). Eliminating these distinct inflections in favor of a single invariant form ( nous avoir , vous avoir , ils avoir ) dramatically reduces the memory ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Latest Posts

Image

Choices Deportee Aims to Make America’s Loss Jamaica’s Gain Alvin McLean at the headquarters of the Family Unification & Resettlement Initiative A nonprofit in Jamaica is helping a growing network of deportees from the U.S. find a foothold in their country of origin.

Post a Comment
Image

SDGCK Reports: Here is the updated financial model based on 160,000 businesses, an hourly sales rate of £2,000.00 per business, a population of 5,000,000 people, and 365 days per year. The benefit is a basic economic commitment for economic reasons once the impact of wagelessness caused by automation is accepted by producers of consumer goods and the government that pays for the tremendous cost of the social fall out or human health problems caused by the wagelessness that equals moneylessness. The solution is obvious as iterated in the UDHR Article 25. The resistance to this fact in the English economies denies the origins of the English population as Europeans. The resistance and its tendency in the banks to withhold benefits payments from citizens is an non English and foreign phenomenon that has occupied itself handsomely in the UK at the banking operations level for at least two generations after WW2. Its origin seems to be Port Royal; bottles with DNA and written messages in them that women were asked to incubate as children; and they were paid. It may have been seen else where at docks in the north and in the east end of London as some anthropy referred to as blocage. We know we can afford the benefit and we accept it is necessary economically for market utility so that there is money in the market available to consumers to buy the robotically made or machine made goods. If not, everything shuts down no matter how cheaply the goods are made. There are no sales and so then there is no consistent circular, continuous revenue. There is depression and recession, crime and theft. If they cannot buy the goods they have come to rely on, they will steal. They steal and then the jails and Courts are full. This is an interruption of the eternal positive monetary circular movement of the economy where everyone, if it is not interrupted, is in the benefit from their participation in their aspect of economic activity. Maybe they are just a consumer, father and mother of the next potential bus driver or national hockey team members. For this, they receive their participatory remuneration; also known as their basic income support benefit. It might be only 10 pence a minute or it's 20 pence a minute. The amount; if its 20 pence a minute or 30 pence per minute is chosen to ensure that basic daily human dignity can be maintained and the citizen has sufficient monies daily to maintain themselves. 20 pence a minute is £ 288 per day in benefits and 30 pence is £432 per day in benefits. This is then made available through a special debit electronic currency card; a UK NHS card or the Canada Benefit Card. The small fraction of money paid per minute is like the fraction of energy we pay into the machines per minute or per hour; much like a kilowatt. Click here. Baseline Figures & Revenue Confirmation Total Businesses: 160,000 Hourly Revenue per Business: £2,000.00 Hours per Year: 365 \text{ days} \times 24 \text{ hours} = 8,760 \text{ hours} Minutes per Year: 8,760 \text{ hours} \times 60 \text{ minutes} = 525,600 \text{ minutes} Population: 5,000,000 Total Gross Revenue Calculation \text{Gross Revenue} = 160,000 \times £2,000 \times 8,760 = £2,803,200,000,000 \quad (£2.8032 \text{ trillion}) Confirmed Tax Revenue per Year Scenario 1 (20% VAT): £2,803,200,000,000 \times 0.20 = \mathbf{£560,640,000,000} \quad (£560.64 \text{ billion}) Scenario 2 (39% Sales Tax): £2,803,200,000,000 \times 0.39 = \mathbf{£1,093,248,000,000} \quad (£1.0932 \text{ trillion}) Scenario 1: 20% VAT & 20 Pence per Minute Benefits 1. Benefit Payout Breakdown (20p/min per person) Annual Benefit per Person: £0.20 \times 525,600 \text{ minutes} = £105,120 Total Yearly Benefit Payout (5M Population): 5,000,000 \times £105,120 = \mathbf{£525,600,000,000} \quad (£525.6 \text{ billion}) Monthly Benefit Payout: \frac{£525,600,000,000}{12} = \mathbf{£43,800,000,000} \quad (£43.8 \text{ billion}) Daily Benefit Payout: \frac{£525,600,000,000}{365} = \mathbf{£1,440,000,000} \quad (£1.44 \text{ billion}) 2. Net Balance \text{VAT Revenue} - \text{Total Annual Benefits} = £560.64 \text{ billion} - £525.60 \text{ billion} = \mathbf{+£35,040,000,000} (A surplus of £35.04 billion) CLICK HERE.

Post a Comment
Image

Moneyless-ness due to automation is in reality Wage-lessness. By Chuck Sax Windlass Bank with Real Economist News. The core paradox of technological unemployment and aggregate demand—famously captured in the exchange between union leader Walter Reuther and a Ford executive showing off factory robots: when the executive asked how Reuther planned to collect union dues from the machines, Reuther replied, "How are you going to get them( the machines ) to buy cars?" Saving human labor lowers unit costs and expands margins for an individual firm, but across the macroeconomy, wage labor is or was the primary vehicle for distributing consumer purchasing power. Without wages, high-volume production encounters a wall of missing effective demand if this is not substituted with an unconditional universal non means tested benefit. We will face a crisis without this benefit. Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. We feed the multitudes. We provide a fraction of the money we saved on wages to the consumer. We ensure the government inputs this benefit throughout the economy, assisting every citizen and permanent resident who are the consumers. We give some money to industrialists within the lawful remit of relevant government programs. But without money provided to consumers, we get an industrial desert. We are just warriors who do have access to the benefits system and will save our home land by paying the benefits to every citizen. It's the law. We are not just orphans needing to be accepted after messing up some where else in the English world. We see no fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos, no wimps, no radicals; just warriors; and some with beards. It is just that the English people in the world are the only people who have not taken the same solution to Wage-lessness as the other G7 populations. But we boast about those other populations; especially the Chinese. The solution is a guaranteed unconditional universal income support benefit paid to all on your economy who have the right to work. We take a portion back as the sales tax and we can pursue an elevated sales tax on consumer activity (an automation tax) to ensure there is no anxiety about a universal unconditional income support benefit and its cost feasibility. The benefit solves all homelessness crisis or crises. We will clear encampments with emergency benefits cards so people on there encampments can find hotel or motel shelter. With the good benefit we allow people to self serve in answering their problems or needs. We build condos where most of the units can be used as housing at a special housing rate; if they request this special lease rate and qualify as the unemployed. If it's a housing unit, a yellow circle sticker one inch on diameter is placed on the door. The building manager may enter when you are gone out and steal your bacon since you asked for housing. But otherwise it's a condo building unit. A portion of the money goes to the government on all these units. They financed it. But without the benefits paid to all citizens, the English economies remain Orphan economies; Estranged economies. Click here. I don't care what material wealth you have but whatever you have, you must look good and feel good and don't provoke me however about what you have with a Benz abandoned at my palace gate for five minutes; whatever Bahamian you are and then you come to pick it up to be seen by me. We should have more inclusiveness regardless of race but not anxious inclusiveness. We are just as good as those posh bi lingual Europeans. Are we not just as Posh?; or at least we will be, have to be! We will not be diminished by any further debates on this issue of a non-means tested benefit for our economy. It has to be paid to everyone without conditions and those English people moving over seas will get both the English benefit and any Canadian benefits to which they are entitled. This is a Kingly English proper economy worthy of a true European King; worthy of the King of... Bruges, Zurich or Amstel; not this poor lousy, puny minded man, wicked man game from Sarnia with his ultimately racial agenda with political correctness. We will not only keep in pace with these other Royal economies. We will exceed them into terms of payments completed by sending money every two weeks. The economy must revere the Royal laws and mandate. England is Great, England is big. England is grand and we know we can afford it; the unconditional universal income support benefit for every citizen. Anyone who suggested that we are saving money by cancelling benefits for the government employed or for those with savings of £100,000.00 or more is an enemy of England. He gave the Royal 15 Rolexes and then pretended to be his son but he is not a Mountbatten. If he was, he would get dubbed at Hampstead near the Thistle and they would confirm his title. Clearly he is not since means testing is small, poor thinking. He also keeps saying that he wants to know what the Royal understands about anything; and has tried to make him look like a lousy crumpet man; not the food crumpet man. But these policies are not the Royal policies since they fail to actualise true Celtic Gaelic defensiveness, Celtic pride and self preservation with this means testing as if the Royal would ever be anxious about what you could "have" as a plebe. Why are benefits being cancelled if the recipient woman would drink London Pride in public; in Leeds? But you should have something and without stealing it. My proposal for the economy is £100,000.00 per year in benefits without means testing and 50% sales tax; with a virtual currency card. The economy must reference me and my people and I pretended with the man from John Amos only to see what he would do, what he would say if given the chance to try and defame the UK. He has tried to screw me, drug me and make me his widget. Just give them a gift, take a desk and do what you want or he is a son and knows what to do. The Brandon Residential School in Manitoba will be a travellers hostel. We would like to consider all the English people in the world as a market for English and European goods; especially German vehicles and goods; not just American and Japanese goods. Marks and Spencer products will be a feature item offering in all Loblaws shops; especially wines, beers, can sodas and drinks, cookies, candies, soaps, crackers and canned foods. We believe free trade is the best way to achieve this as we understand that we could have unholy trade tariff wars where we all lose. It is the loss in the extended American market for the sale of one's goods and the loss in product diversity that is most troubling. Losing Canada is not so significant to ask of an American beer producer but it is a loss in sales; an unnecessary loss. As we are selling less, we are hiring less people. President Thump knows but he is being threatened by a Canadian to do everything backwards so that he can feel superior to those who went to school at the University of St. Xavier in Nova Scotia. "I was made to make" is a slogan in a new Ontario government commercial about the building of the Ontario subway line. But what about making the population safe and secure in light of the joblessness that causes Wage-lessness and Money-lessness that leads to food and shelter insecurity. We can solve this with the same fortitude used to build a safe subway track with all the anxiety about ensuring life is safe. As such, we build safe social spaces where everyone has enough benefit money to navigate through urban spaces with sufficient financial resources. The government can bail out corporations and finance home construction, build subways also. It must also bail out, guarantee and ensure it's population is safe when facing all the risk of Wage-lessness. North America is a German Japanese car market but no matter how much we save in human labour, what market for sales of the finished product is there if the population does not have any money due to Wage-lessness to...purchase the car product? Without wages, high-volume production encounters a wall of missing effective demand if this is not substituted with an unconditional universal non means tested benefit. This non means-tested benefit is to maintain the Royal plebes. It's given to everyone regardless of means. It's a benefit for all that are settled in our economy. You are a Royal plebe boy, not a martyr, but you will have your benefits and arrears; now. We are tired of the sense of defeat among us while other populations are thriving in our own spaces; including Reading. The English on the other hand is disappearing as if we have resigned occupation of our spaces to all other cultures. Enjoy the Chinese Buffet there now at £15.00 for two buffet plates. But you will be able to afford it. Buy an MG or a Mini Cooper or the BMW or Benz. Be happy. We have more territory than the Swiss so our economy will be just as big or higher as we get out of misery in means testing the benefits. We will follow the Swiss strategy that solves the Wage-lessness. It's a good, White thing. But we have inclusiveness. I had a black girlfriend once and she made me a box of caramel and all kinds of candies and chocolate that made my coiffure go pow. My white girl made bread with iron, pow coiffure and growth power like what you find in a band-aid; the brand name products have more and the store brand products have a little less; and no Cesium. It just builds up in the atmosphere, the soil and the ground water. Only a big mouse or ground hog that was dying of Cesium (rat poison) and that witnessed the stream in which it was dying just evaporate around him would tell us, if given the chance, (some how) that this was his dying experience with water just as he was putting Cesium in all the food and drinks to see it manifest in a deathly way in the atmosphere so you would be warned in his love for mouse kind. Click here.

Post a Comment