You received a check from the U.S. treasury 2 days ago. You never resigned from your office as the former Vice President. The Democrats are disqualified as the Democrat's candidate is (4)a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States and cannot be a candidate. As such, to knowingly solicit any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 is a criminal offence. The provisions under 18 U.S. Code 602 concerning solicitation and political contributions were violated by the Democrats. It was violated by the Democrats during the 2020 campaign. See paragraph 4. Every time the challenger asked for a donation or if any former President asked for a donation or any former First Lady, this violated the provisions herein and is subject to indictment and three years imprisonment. Further to this, he cannot run for President as a person who remains an employee of the US. Government. See 5 U.S. Code § 7323. Click here.

 You received a check from the U.S. treasury 2 days ago.  You never resigned from your office as the former Vice President.  The Democrats are disqualified as the Democrat's candidate is (4)a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States and cannot be a candidate.  As such,  to knowingly solicit any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 is a criminal offence.         The provisions under 18 U.S. Code 602 concerning solicitation and political contributions were violated by the Democrats.  It  was violated by the Democrats during the 2020 campaign. See paragraph 4.  Every time the challenger asked for a donation or if any  former President  asked for a donation or any former First Lady, this violated the provisions herein and is subject to indictment and three years imprisonment.  Further to this, he cannot run for President as a person who remains an employee of the US. Government.    See  5 U.S. Code § 7323.     Click here.   


The Democrats are disqualified as the Democrat's candidate is (4)a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States and cannot be a candidate.  As such,  to knowingly solicit any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 is a criminal offence.         The provisions under 18 U.S. Code 602 concerning solicitation and political contributions were violated by the Democrats.  It  was violated by the Democrats during the 2020 campaign. See paragraph 4.  Every time the challenger asked for a donation or if any  former President  asked for a donation or any former First Lady, this violated the provisions herein and is subject to indictment and three years imprisonment.  Further to this, he cannot run for President as a person who remains an employee of the US. Government or in receipt of funds paid by the U.S. Treasury.   See  5 U.S. Code § 7323.     Click here.


The provisions under 18 U.S. Code 602 concerning solicitation and political contributions were violated by the Democrats.  It  was violated by the Democrats during the 2020 campaign. See paragraph 4 of 18 U.S. Code 602.    Every time the challenger asked for a donation or if any  former President  asked for a donation or any former First Lady, this violated the provisions herein and is subject to indictment and three years imprisonment.  Further to this, he cannot run for President as a person who remains an employee of the US. Government or in receipt of funds paid by the U.S. Treasury.   See  5 U.S. Code § 7323.     Click here.

18 U.S. Code § 602.Solicitation of political contributions

(a)It shall be unlawful for—
(1)
a candidate for the Congress;
(2)
an individual elected to or serving in the office of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress;
(3)
an officer or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof; or
(4)
a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States; to knowingly solicit any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 from any other such officer, employee, or person. Any person who violates this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
(b)
The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any activity of an employee (as defined in section 7322(1) of title 5) or any individual employed in or under the United States Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission, unless that activity is prohibited by section 7323 or 7324 of such title.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 722; Pub. L. 96–187, title II, § 201(a)(3), Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1367; Pub. L. 103–94, § 4(a), Oct. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 1004; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 109–435, title VI, § 604(f), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3242.)

5 U.S. Code § 7322 - Definitions
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
For the purpose of this subchapter—


(1)“employee” means any individual, other than the President and the Vice President, employed or holding office in—
(A)an Executive agency other than the Government Accountability Office; or
(B)a position within the competitive service which is not in an Executive agency;
but does not include a member of the uniformed services or an individual employed or holding office in the government of the District of Columbia;
(2)“partisan political office” means any office for which any candidate is nominated or elected as representing a party any of whose candidates for Presidential elector received votes in the last preceding election at which Presidential electors were selected, but shall exclude any office or position within a political party or affiliated organization; and
(3)“political contribution”—
(A)means any gift, subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value, made for any political purpose;
(B)includes any contract, promise, or agreement, express or implied, whether or not legally enforceable, to make a contribution for any political purpose;
(C)includes any payment by any person, other than a candidate or a political party or affiliated organization, of compensation for the personal services of another person which are rendered to any candidate or political party or affiliated organization without charge for any political purpose; and
(D)includes the provision of personal services for any political purpose.
(Added Pub. L. 103–94, § 2(a), Oct. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 1001; amended Pub. L. 108–271, § 8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 112–230, § 3(e), Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1617.)









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment