You received a check from the U.S. treasury 2 days ago. You never resigned from your office as the former Vice President. The Democrats are disqualified as the Democrat's candidate is (4)a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States and cannot be a candidate. As such, to knowingly solicit any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 is a criminal offence. The provisions under 18 U.S. Code 602 concerning solicitation and political contributions were violated by the Democrats. It was violated by the Democrats during the 2020 campaign. See paragraph 4. Every time the challenger asked for a donation or if any former President asked for a donation or any former First Lady, this violated the provisions herein and is subject to indictment and three years imprisonment. Further to this, he cannot run for President as a person who remains an employee of the US. Government. See 5 U.S. Code § 7323. Click here.

 You received a check from the U.S. treasury 2 days ago.  You never resigned from your office as the former Vice President.  The Democrats are disqualified as the Democrat's candidate is (4)a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States and cannot be a candidate.  As such,  to knowingly solicit any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 is a criminal offence.         The provisions under 18 U.S. Code 602 concerning solicitation and political contributions were violated by the Democrats.  It  was violated by the Democrats during the 2020 campaign. See paragraph 4.  Every time the challenger asked for a donation or if any  former President  asked for a donation or any former First Lady, this violated the provisions herein and is subject to indictment and three years imprisonment.  Further to this, he cannot run for President as a person who remains an employee of the US. Government.    See  5 U.S. Code § 7323.     Click here.   


The Democrats are disqualified as the Democrat's candidate is (4)a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States and cannot be a candidate.  As such,  to knowingly solicit any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 is a criminal offence.         The provisions under 18 U.S. Code 602 concerning solicitation and political contributions were violated by the Democrats.  It  was violated by the Democrats during the 2020 campaign. See paragraph 4.  Every time the challenger asked for a donation or if any  former President  asked for a donation or any former First Lady, this violated the provisions herein and is subject to indictment and three years imprisonment.  Further to this, he cannot run for President as a person who remains an employee of the US. Government or in receipt of funds paid by the U.S. Treasury.   See  5 U.S. Code § 7323.     Click here.


The provisions under 18 U.S. Code 602 concerning solicitation and political contributions were violated by the Democrats.  It  was violated by the Democrats during the 2020 campaign. See paragraph 4 of 18 U.S. Code 602.    Every time the challenger asked for a donation or if any  former President  asked for a donation or any former First Lady, this violated the provisions herein and is subject to indictment and three years imprisonment.  Further to this, he cannot run for President as a person who remains an employee of the US. Government or in receipt of funds paid by the U.S. Treasury.   See  5 U.S. Code § 7323.     Click here.

18 U.S. Code § 602.Solicitation of political contributions

(a)It shall be unlawful for—
(1)
a candidate for the Congress;
(2)
an individual elected to or serving in the office of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress;
(3)
an officer or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof; or
(4)
a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States; to knowingly solicit any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 from any other such officer, employee, or person. Any person who violates this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
(b)
The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any activity of an employee (as defined in section 7322(1) of title 5) or any individual employed in or under the United States Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission, unless that activity is prohibited by section 7323 or 7324 of such title.

5 U.S. Code § 7322 - Definitions
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
For the purpose of this subchapter—


(1)“employee” means any individual, other than the President and the Vice President, employed or holding office in—
(A)an Executive agency other than the Government Accountability Office; or
(B)a position within the competitive service which is not in an Executive agency;
but does not include a member of the uniformed services or an individual employed or holding office in the government of the District of Columbia;
(2)“partisan political office” means any office for which any candidate is nominated or elected as representing a party any of whose candidates for Presidential elector received votes in the last preceding election at which Presidential electors were selected, but shall exclude any office or position within a political party or affiliated organization; and
(3)“political contribution”—
(A)means any gift, subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value, made for any political purpose;
(B)includes any contract, promise, or agreement, express or implied, whether or not legally enforceable, to make a contribution for any political purpose;
(C)includes any payment by any person, other than a candidate or a political party or affiliated organization, of compensation for the personal services of another person which are rendered to any candidate or political party or affiliated organization without charge for any political purpose; and
(D)includes the provision of personal services for any political purpose.
(Added Pub. L. 103–94, § 2(a), Oct. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 1001; amended Pub. L. 108–271, § 8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 112–230, § 3(e), Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1617.)









Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?