When to use the term President-Elect; it can only be used when an election result has been certified in a full and complete election process. Calling the election and coronating your chosen husbands as projected winners does not entitle you to declare anyone President -Elect. The current scenario is soo irresponsible and dismissive of the legal requirements in the election process and the evidently irregular, illegal ballot burning and destruction in the case of the prohibited challenger that it all smells like the gangrine flesh of a coup. Gangrine is actually spelled "gangrene." We need to be precise about these things. In 2020, there was only one candidate entitled to participate in the election and the irregularities concerning the prohibited involvement of the challenger was recognised in due course. If the prohibited candidate had been sworn in and then discovered as prohibited, the incumbent would regain his office. This would be so even if it took a year to remember the requirements of the law that cannot be ignored no matter how pretty the challenger is and no matter how big his dick or his wife's dick. But, what are the laws about theft and prohibited candidacy if your wife has a dick? Maybe, you being told to believe anything goes. But, how does a female creature with a dick abrogate everything? Maybe Maybe you might get free hamburgers for your cause but you do not get a licence to kill every American and threaten the constitution in some biblical syllogism about the abominable desolation but America is pretty desolate right now. She should have told you about her dick but your wedding can be annulled as a void contract as consummation is not legally possible. Maybe she should have told you before you would find out in your own after all of your JW family's expense. It's disappointing and the law remains in tact once the prohibition is discovered. Your defence is that you did not knowingly intend to campaign as a prohibited individual but you did intend to intimidate others out of the race. The democratic party can keep the donations to reeducate Democrats around America and prepare for the next Black Lives Matter protest and revisit the possibility of becoming a viable third party. It is not only irresponsible but illegal and reckless for members of the press to report anyone as President Elect until such a person is a certified election winner. It is a false and misleading statement. The FCC is obliged to send out warnings to errant news agencies that do not comply with FCC guidelines. The U.S. FCC is not usually ignored on these issues but it is as if rogue elements supporting The prohibited challenger have abused FCC requirements. Allegedly, the Authorities will be reviewing these abuses closely and any evidence of abuses. Click here for more.

 When to use the term President-Elect; it can only be used when an election result has been certified in a full and complete election process.  Calling the election  and coronating your chosen husbands as projected winners does not entitle you to declare anyone President -Elect.   The current scenario is soo irresponsible and dismissive of the legal requirements in the election process and the evidently irregular, illegal ballot burning and destruction in the case of the prohibited challenger that it all smells like the gangrine flesh of a coup. Gangrine is actually spelled "gangrene."    We need to be precise about these things.     In 2020, there was only one candidate entitled to participate in the election and the irregularities concerning the prohibited involvement of the challenger was recognised in due course.  If the prohibited candidate had been sworn in and then discovered as prohibited, the incumbent would regain his office.   This would be so even if it took a year to remember the requirements of the law that cannot be ignored no matter how pretty the challenger is and no matter how big his dick or his wife's dick. But, what are the laws about theft and prohibited candidacy if your wife has a dick? Maybe, you being told to believe anything goes.  But, how does a female creature with a dick abrogate everything? Maybe Maybe you might get free hamburgers for your cause but you do not get a licence to kill every American and threaten the constitution in some biblical syllogism about the abominable desolation but America is pretty desolate right now.   She should have told you about her dick  but your wedding can be annulled as a void contract as consummation is not legally possible. Maybe she should have told you before you would find out in your own after all of your JW family's expense. It's disappointing and the law remains in tact once the prohibition is discovered.  Your defence is that you did not knowingly intend to campaign as a prohibited individual but you did intend to intimidate others out of the race.   The democratic party can keep the donations to reeducate Democrats around America and prepare for the next Black Lives Matter protest and revisit the possibility of becoming a viable third  party.     It is not only irresponsible but illegal and reckless for members of the press to report anyone as President Elect until such a person is a certified election winner.  It is a false and misleading statement.  The FCC is obliged to send out warnings to errant news agencies that do not comply with FCC guidelines. The U.S. FCC is not usually ignored on these issues but it is as if rogue elements supporting The prohibited challenger have abused FCC requirements.  Allegedly, the Authorities will be reviewing these abuses closely and any evidence of abuses.     Click here for more.    

The President-Elect:

An officer-elect refers to a person who has been elected to a position but has not yet been installed.[1][2] For example, a president who has been elected but not yet installed would be referred to as a president-elect (e.g. President-elect of the United States).

Analogously, the term -designate (e.g. prime minister-designate) is used for the same purpose.

HistoryEdit

This usage of the term -elect originated in the Catholic Church, where bishops were elected but would not take office until ordained. In addition, the winner of a papal election would be known as the pope-elect until he was confirmed and actually became pope.[3]

The term entered politics with the practice of elective monarchy. For example, the Holy Roman Emperor was elected by a college of prince-electors, but the winning candidate would not become emperor until he was crowned by the pope. Between election and coronation, he was known as the imperator electus, or Emperor-elect.[4]

By the 19th century, the term had expanded to describe any position in which a substantial period of time elapses between election and installation. For example, it was common in the 19th century to refer to a fiancée as a bride-elect.[5][6]

Official positions in organizationsEdit

The bylaws of some clubs and other organizations may define an official position of president-elect similar to a vice president position.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The members of the organization elect the president-elect, rather than directly electing the organization's president.[15] The president-elect may be given limited duties, similar to a Vice-President. At the end of the term, the president-elect is promoted to the position of president, and a new president-elect is elected. The advantage of this schema is a clear continuity of succession, as well as the opportunity to familiarize the president-elect with the operations of the organization before becoming president. A possible drawback is that once a president-elect has been elected, another person cannot be elected president unless the president-elect resigns or is removed from office.[15]

The position of president-elect is different from someone who was elected president and is called "president-elect" between the time of election and the start of the term. For example, if an election for president was held in January, but the term of office does not begin until March, the person who was elected president may be called "president-elect" but does not hold any power until the term begins in March. On the other hand, someone in the position of president-elect has all the powers of that position that the bylaws provide.

Similarly, organizations may have other official positions such as vice president-elect, secretary-treasurer-elect, director-elect, and chair-elect.[14][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment