There is one evidence of the past problem with the global economy which is now being resolved and that is the impedance to new automated services caused by under funded participants in the economy. The American is engaged in defending his lack of comprehension involving his place and existence in the modern world. He espouses blind epithets but does not really understand the capitalist system or the solutions to automation. Tell me China is not capitalist. Tell me Guangzhou is not evidence of the success of China's understanding of capitalism. What we have learned is that Capitalism in America as practised by the White American aboriginal is really aboriginal self defeat. The Chinese do not allow the joblessness occasioned in the process of labor automation to cause any impedance to the system and the flow of goods from provider- producer to consumer. A lack of money per citizen causes impedance. What the economy is hoping to achieve is a certainty of available automatic finance per citizen so that you could enjoy more automated services that will include approvals for brand new automotive purchases with your only interface initially being a computer or a key pad at a car dispensing machine with name, address and telephone being enough for the machine to approve you for the four to ten year financing arrangement. Is American politics holding up the future of life and consumer experiences in America? Is Politics holding up the economy? How are airports built and maybe those people should be directly involved in modernising the economy with two simple variables; a national standard policy for income support that says income support cannot be below the amount in Massachusetts paid to its citizens and there is no asset ownership limitation preventing you from having more than $8000.00 in cash before you can start benefiting from the income support. There shall also be a Federal Sales Tax of no less than 20% to 30%. There is no point arguing when if the sales tax is too low, your swaggering big mouthed country will end up dependent on some other country since maybe all you want is cheap food and drink and the idea of the government taking more than 4% on travel, gasoline, food and other expenses makes your "fat, lazy ass" angry. ____________________ Why not then leave the American alone to just die off eventually in his ignorance? Certainly, the American had to understand that a bucket of craw fish and $10,000.00 was not paradise. The wars may have helped to break some Americans out of their emotional and technological isolation from what economies exist in Wisconsin for them to enjoy or in Illinois or Vermont or Minnesota now at no less than $30,000.00 per year per citizen in those states but in Oklahoma it is only $10,000.00 per year. The reason is that it would be Inhumane to leave the American isolated. The other issue is that some people will never leave America alone since how could America become soo big that it might have authority over England, Europe? It never really could have authority over Europe but it must be servile and helpful or else it will continue to suffer the torment that will come from not being servile. The torment is evident in the on-going use of the American as a war dog in conflicts designed presently to disarm America and depopulate America that seems to have said it had no economic need for its under population that was to be funded at no less than $136.00 per day per citizen based on an apparent OECD/UN/ World Bank Directive sent to America in August 2001 and one month later, since America did not comply, 9/11 happened. The question was how could America that does not understand capitalism and that does not understand capitalism's need for citizens funded automatically with cash in the form of income support for its consumers have any purpose? America is evidence of the languishment that takes place with ready automated technology and automated services that is impeded by such arrogant aboriginal populations locked in latent stages of human evolution. America should have been the vanguard on income support but it is backward with regard to the economic indicators referred to as income support/aka basic income. It's sales tax percentage is also too low nationally. The automation economy was simple enough for a caveman to understand. If Walter Reuther could not solve the answer to the economy with some compassion for those Ford and GM working families that were suffering joblessness due to automation, then he was a cave man but a caveman who chose not to solve it and that was not motivated to solve it. There is the problem with many politicians concerned with approval ratings that they believe will improve if we pretend to have some gravitas in world politics but what gravitas can you have if you are deliberately closing your economy and your country to levels of economic activity not seen since 1938? It has to be deliberate when you have a solution to job automation that will prevent the recessions occasioned by automation. But, you do not implement them. If its not deliberate, then it is the result of limited human comprehension and evidence of how the american remains unevolved although he uses a dish washer and a microwave quite often. See Walter Reuther's video at Washington in 1959. The answer was just to do as you were told by Europe, by England, England!!! In failing to do as they were told, America fell into the torment. $200.00 per day per citizen in the income support will heal America and enable America to rebuild and replenish it's population with happy capitalism and consumerism as managed by Europe and Asia, so that there will always be some kind of American population although managed by Europe. In America's defence, they have more people in actual countable numbers who have some kind of guaranteed universal unconditional income support than their ally to the north. There will be a NORTH American population but one that is managed to be healthy, happy consumers of various global products(AUDI, BMW, REVLON, SMIRNOFF, LINDT Chocolate), managed like well fed, well dressed, respected animals in a zoo. If the English or Europe need any war dogs, once America replenishes it's population, there will be a sufficient population from which to raise an army again who can fall off cliffs or get blown up in Chinooks day after day after day. But, first, these will be people entirely engaged in raising families and consumerism otherwise as graduates from fully occupied high schools and fully occupied universities.

There is one evidence of the past problem with the global economy which is now being resolved and that is the impedance to new automated services caused by under funded participants in the economy.   The American is engaged in defending his lack of comprehension  involving his place and existence in the modern world.   He espouses blind epithets but does not really understand the capitalist system or the solutions to automation.  Tell me China is not capitalist.  Tell me Guangzhou is not evidence of the success of China's understanding of capitalism. What we have learned is that Capitalism in America as practised by the White American aboriginal is really aboriginal self defeat.   The Chinese do not allow the joblessness occasioned in the process of labor automation to cause any impedance to the system and the flow of goods from provider- producer to consumer.  A lack of money per citizen causes impedance.  What the economy is hoping to achieve is a certainty of available automatic finance per citizen so that you could enjoy more automated services that will include approvals for brand new automotive purchases with your only interface initially being a computer or a key pad at a car dispensing machine with name, address and telephone being enough for the machine to approve you for the four to ten year financing arrangement.  Is American politics holding up the future of life and consumer experiences in America?   Is Politics holding up the economy? How are airports built and maybe those people should be directly involved in modernising the economy with two simple variables; a national standard policy for income support that says income support cannot be below the amount in Massachusetts paid to its citizens and there is no asset ownership limitation preventing you from having more than $8000.00 in cash before you can start benefiting from the income support. There shall also be a Federal Sales Tax of no less than 20% to 30%. There is no point arguing when if the sales tax is too low, your swaggering big mouthed country will end up dependent on some other country since maybe all you want is cheap food and drink and the idea of the government taking more than 4% on travel, gasoline, food and other expenses makes your  "fat, lazy ass" angry.        

____________________

Why not then leave the American alone to just die off eventually in his ignorance?  Certainly, the American had to understand that a bucket of craw fish and $10,000.00 was not paradise.  The wars may have helped to break some Americans out of their  emotional and technological isolation from what economies exist in Wisconsin for them to enjoy or in Illinois or Vermont or Minnesota now at no less than $30,000.00 per year per citizen in those states but in Oklahoma it is only $10,000.00 per year.  

The reason is that it would be Inhumane to leave the American isolated.    The other issue is that some people will never leave America alone since how could America become soo big that it might have authority over England, Europe?  It never really could have authority over Europe but it must be servile and helpful  or else it will continue to suffer the torment that will come from not being servile.   The torment is evident in the on-going use of the American as a war dog in conflicts designed presently to disarm America and depopulate America that seems to have said it had no economic need for its under population that was to be funded at no less than $136.00 per day per citizen based on an apparent OECD/UN/ World Bank  Directive sent to America in August 2001 and one month later, since America did not comply, 9/11 happened.  The question was  how could America that does not understand capitalism and that does not understand capitalism's need for citizens funded automatically with cash in the form of income support for its consumers have any purpose?   America is evidence of  the languishment that takes place with ready automated technology  and automated services that is impeded by such arrogant aboriginal populations locked in latent stages of  human evolution.  America should have been the vanguard on income support but it is backward with regard to the economic indicators referred to as income support/aka basic income. It's sales tax percentage is also too low nationally.  The automation economy was simple enough for a caveman to understand.  If Walter Reuther could not solve the answer to the economy with some compassion for those Ford and GM working families that were suffering joblessness due to automation, then he was a cave man but a caveman who chose not to solve it and that was not motivated to solve it.  There is  the problem with many politicians concerned with approval ratings that they believe will improve if we pretend to have some gravitas in world politics but what gravitas can you have if you are deliberately closing your economy and your country to levels of economic activity not seen since 1938? It has to be deliberate when you have a solution to job automation that will prevent the recessions occasioned by automation. But, you do not implement them. If its not deliberate, then it is the result of limited human comprehension and evidence of how the american remains unevolved although he uses a dish washer and a microwave quite often.     See Walter Reuther's video at Washington in 1959.  The answer was just to do as you were told by Europe, by England, England!!!   

In failing to do as they were told, America fell into the torment.  $200.00 per day per citizen in the income support will heal America and enable America to rebuild  and replenish it's population with happy capitalism and consumerism as managed by Europe and Asia,  so that there will always be  some kind of American population although managed by Europe.  In America's defence, they have more people in actual countable numbers who have some kind of guaranteed universal unconditional income support than their ally to the north.   There will be a NORTH American population  but one that is managed to be healthy, happy consumers of various global products(AUDI, BMW, REVLON, SMIRNOFF, LINDT Chocolate), managed  like well fed, well dressed, respected animals in a zoo.  If the English or Europe need any war dogs, once America replenishes it's population, there will be a sufficient population from which to raise an army again who can fall off cliffs or get blown up in Chinooks day  after day after day.  But, first,  these will be people entirely engaged in raising families and consumerism otherwise as graduates from fully occupied high schools and fully occupied universities.