No breakthrough during ‘exhausting’ online climate talks By FRANK JORDANS yesterday

 

No breakthrough during ‘exhausting’ online climate talks

yesterday

BERLIN (AP) — No breakthroughs have been made on key issues during three weeks of international climate talks that ended Thursday, officials said, with plans now for a select group of ministers to come together next month in the hope of making progress ahead of a U.N. summit in November.

The expert-level May 31-June 17 climate meeting that took place online was seen as a test of the new cooperative spirit following President Joe Biden’s decision to return the United States to the Paris climate accord.

While no formal decisions were expected, participants tried to tackle thorny topics including aid for poor countries and rules for international carbon markets — an issue that has firmly divided nations for years.

“I cannot say that there was really any breakthrough in the consultations that took place here,” said United Nations climate chief Patricia Espinosa.

“It is time that we try to have some guidance from ministers,” she added.

ADVERTISEMENT

The chair of this year’s climate summit in Glasgow, Britain’s Alok Sharma, said he has invited “a representative group of ministers” for talks in late July to chart out the next steps.

Keeping alive the most ambitious goal of the Paris accord — limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) — was “absolutely vital to very many millions of people around the world who are facing the challenge of climate change head on,” he said.

The world has already warmed by about 1.2 C (2.2 F) and scientists say there’s not much time left to ensure the Paris target is met.

Climate campaigners have criticized rich countries for failing to fulfil their promise of giving developing nations $100 billion a year to tackle global warming, a pledge that Espinosa called “absolutely crucial” for the credibility of the ongoing negotiations.

Under the principles of the Paris accord, countries voluntarily set out their own contributions to international climate finance and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This has resulted in a delicate diplomatic dance in which governments have largely avoided making big steps without ensuring rivals follow suit.

Sharma said Britain aims to offer delegates who haven’t been able to get vaccinated before November an opportunity to do so as part of a special program, though details of that have yet to be worked out.

“My primary objective is to ensure that we have a physical meeting which all delegates can attend safely,” he said.

The virtual meeting, which saw numerous technical glitches and required participants to share the burden of joining meetings before dawn, during the afternoon or late at night — depending on their respective time zones — had been “exhausting,” Espinosa said.

___

Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?