They say every Sunday that Church attendance is plunging but on that day, church was full. The next week, only 1/4 of the building was full. When it was 1/4 full, he said membership is rising and Church was full again. Abraham had five Nefertiti type partners before Sarai and none of them could give him a baby. His problem and confusion did not clear up until he left the people with whom he lived most of his life and they never explained to him how it works; with seed and wombs in the Woman. He left with Sarai and she was still not the answer he needed. It was not until he went to School in Egypt and had an audience with Pharaoh that he would begin to understand. He was an Egyptian boy and son of a Pharaoh who was abandoned in the desert as he fell off a wagon and missed the benefit of School in Egypt. He eventually returned to Egypt and had an audience with Pharaoh. Pharaoh gave him livestock and a baby in a basket on the back of a donkey. Sarai knew and she kept

They say every Sunday that Church attendance is plunging but on that day, church was full. The next week, only 1/4 of the building was full.  When it was 1/4 full, he said membership is rising and Church was full again.   Abraham had five Nefertiti type  partners before Sarai and none of them could give him a baby. His problem and confusion did not clear up until he left the people with whom he lived most of his life and they never explained to him how it works; with seed and wombs in the Woman.  He left with Sarai and she was still not the answer he needed.  It was not until he went to School in Egypt and had an audience with Pharaoh that he would begin to understand.    He was an Egyptian boy and son of a Pharaoh who was abandoned in the desert as he fell off a wagon and missed the benefit of School in Egypt. He eventually returned to Egypt and had an audience with Pharaoh. Pharaoh gave him livestock and a baby in a basket on the back of a donkey.  Sarai knew and she kept the baby quiet with all the animals making noise so the baby was not heard among all the lambs.    It would have saved him time, as a 99 year old,  with his understanding if he had gone to school; in Egypt. He would have had a wife by 20 years old instead of five feminine creatures and the one he is still with cannot have the baby. 






Comments

Popular Posts

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.