Click here. At Angel Ronan, we support the de facto White(pale skin aboriginal) Supremacy with evident inclusion making social participation available to all in a society with a majority white population with only a coincidental supremacy in numbers primarily but maybe not in influence since numbers does not beat financial supremacy which is shared with Asians and Europeans in North America who do not think of themselves as white. The pale skin (white) aboriginals in Iceland are white and they have hegemony or accidental superiority in their country but it is not to abuse any other human and they maintain a system of equality and equal treatment for all, providing $50,000.00 Euros to every citizen. The majority of the teachers were white in our experience and they kept us safe, ensuring our fair participation and treatment in the education process. They also teach about equal treatment in society and the global community. The supremacy is a de facto reality in a pale skin majority community but not a set position based on hatred or false notions of color superiority; evidently not as they taught and prepared various students for work. the English and the Irish establishment do not consider themselves white as white is an aboriginal assimilation term for the North American aboriginal where the term originated. The greatest threat to the truth of universal non racialized business competition and non racialized c consumerism is the nesting gestating ignorance in North America. However, with everyday that passes, you are still collecting only 13% sales tax a day and not 20% or 30% as the population and the economy grows smaller due to robotic automation while there is no guaranteed income support right across the country that is affecting economic output and demand orders for goods. The machines are capable of running all day to produce goods without human labor but there is insufficient demand and so output is low with the machines turned off most of the week and the factories about to close along with the malls; the shopping malls that shut as consumers have not received the requisite income support. Putting the money in is not admitting a mistake but demonstrating that the support as requisite is certainly now celebrated as the key to any ongoing, recession free economic miracle. Shopping Malls are closing in North America where the income support has been minimal and inconsistent across the country and the population dwindles; the same population called upon to provide new fresh recruits or "human meat" for the ongoing military pursuits as the only visible expression of unified nationalism yet the continent is divided on simple social policy. Shopping Malls are not closing in Asia. New malls are being built in Asia but not in America. New Malls in Asia and the Middle East as well as Africa are being built where there is a consistent support for every citizen and therefore good, consistent demand for robotically made goods. The robots are not going away or disappearing but the North American is in a rebellion against universal economic logic in the automation age, causing a certain genocide; accidental or intentional. It would seem it is intentional although you say you are not sure if you understand it yet in your ignorance. The UN offers help in your ignorance and you say you need to see your own independence and determination. Yet, your economy is really dead in comparison to its previous expansion and turnover in the 1950's. Maybe you want to bring North America back its pristine state before the European occupation in 1308, turning it into a field with some animals and few nomadic hunter gatherers.

    

At Angel Ronan, we support  the de facto White(pale skin aboriginal) Supremacy with evident inclusion making social participation available to all in a society with a majority white population with only a coincidental supremacy in numbers primarily but maybe not in influence since numbers does not beat financial supremacy which is shared with Asians and Europeans  in North America who do not think of themselves as white. The pale skin (white) aboriginals in Iceland are white and they have hegemony or accidental superiority  in their country but it is not to abuse any other human and they maintain a system of equality and equal treatment for all, providing $50,000.00 Euros to every citizen.     The majority of the teachers were white in our experience and they kept us safe, ensuring our fair participation and treatment in the education process.   They also teach about equal treatment in society and the global community.  The supremacy is a de facto reality in a pale skin majority community  but not a set position based on hatred or false notions of color superiority; evidently not as they taught and prepared various students for work. the English and the Irish establishment do not consider themselves white as white is an aboriginal assimilation term for the North American aboriginal where the term originated.  The greatest threat to the truth of universal non racialized business competition and  non racialized c consumerism is the nesting gestating ignorance  in North America.  However,  with everyday that passes, you are still collecting only 13% sales tax a day and not 20% or 30% as the population and the economy grows smaller due to robotic automation while there is no guaranteed income support right across the country that is affecting economic output and demand orders for goods. The machines are capable of running all day to produce goods without human labor but there is insufficient demand and so output is low with the machines turned off most of the week and the factories about to close along with the malls; the shopping malls that shut as consumers have not received the requisite income support. Putting the money in is not admitting a mistake but demonstrating that the support as requisite is certainly now celebrated as the key to any ongoing, recession free economic miracle. Shopping Malls are closing in North America where the income support has been minimal and inconsistent across the country and the population dwindles; the same population called upon to provide new fresh recruits or "human meat" for the ongoing military pursuits as the only visible expression of unified nationalism yet the continent  is divided on simple social policy.  Shopping Malls are not closing in Asia.  New malls are being built in Asia but not in America.  New Malls in Asia and the Middle East as well as Africa are being built where there is a consistent support for every citizen and therefore good, consistent demand for robotically made goods. The robots are not going away or disappearing but the North American is in a rebellion against universal economic logic in the automation age, causing a certain genocide; accidental or intentional. It would seem it is intentional although you say you are not sure if you understand it yet in your ignorance. The UN offers help in your ignorance and you say you need to see your own independence and determination. Yet, your economy is really dead in comparison to its previous expansion and turnover in the 1950's. Maybe you want to bring North America back its pristine state before the European occupation in 1308, turning it into a field with some animals and few nomadic hunter gatherers.      You run Scotland, Australia, Singapore and the Bahamas at 17.5%. Every citizen has a universal income support in those territories of no less than $20,000.00 USD Equivalent.  Singapore provides $80000.00 per citizen.   The best way to deal with the North American Aboriginal( part native usually) resistance to some formal matters involving property and vehicles is to provide a solid income support at no less than $60000.00 per year so that they can stumble through economic formalities and enjoy the economy and find their own way through the economic fundamentals of bank account registration and property ownership whether its a car or a vehicle.    The Amerindian, white and black, who suffered brutal subjugation as aboriginals became the brutally subjugated aboriginal domestic workers, black and white,  and other laborers who worked in and near the homes but who  had never owned a home of their own but its time to join us Joe as an owner of property instead of maintaining a poor minded   man's  internecine anxiety about social authority and property ownership. The blessed ego wounding chastening words of a friend are faithful.    He is trying to get back to the White House to say who he really is. We thought you were a good white man Joe. I can see the good in you. I feel it. Show us what the good white man understands in a Vermont economy that is modelled on the Ireland economy where they have all kinds of black people; from the West indies and deepest darkest Africa.      Our next research paper addressing ethnic minorities and the law as a follow-up paper to our original paper on the year 2000 will point out how the law serves the Citizen regardless of ethnicity but unfortunately sometimes the only factors fighting the progress of ethnic minorities is other ethnic devil minorities who would hope the system would bend to devil motives from Spanish Town and fight and frustrate other ethnic minorities so that the  ethnic devil minorities will be the only one or that no one will achieve more involvement of social authority than they have achieved in the greater society.   In other words, it's a kind of civil rights movement but in negation.  You can have a white girlfriend but you can't have a white wife.    The system does help people. The problem we encounter here is that evil presents itself in all families and in all races. However, the allegedly marginalized groups who make claims of inequity against the system lose footing when a West Indian father, grandfather, granny or a West Indian mother drills holes in her children's shoes so water seeps in with the intent that they never forget how hard life was or they plant drugs on her own grand children just as soon as the children  get an A in high School and calls the police on them to ensure the children do not escape racial stereotypes and social limitations; her other motivation to guard her own sense of authority and family position.  There has been some improvement in the systemic workings of the West Indian and Anglo Black families as based on the police evidence, bringing them into par with the systemic workings of the Africans whose culture concerning families dates back thousands of years and predates the more troglodyte West Indians who did not begin their journey in the tradition of family until it was introduced to them by the Mediterraneans and Africans  who showed up with Christopher Columbus. When you told the told the West Indian Troglodyte woman that stolen waters are sweet, she wasn't sure if that was a bad thing. She says she was only involved in her own culture of reproduction and could not see what is stolen. The endeavor is to stave away from familial relations involving who will be king or Queen(the boss) arising in the mid 21st Century when the son or daughter only has a high school library card; these familial expressions that resemble the first scene  in the 1968 movie "2001: a Space Odyssey" where the monkeys look like BJ Boddington standing off against Laughmand Load Doing who preys on his cousin's girlfriends and ex girlfriends contrary to Leviticus, who fails to understand that its okay for a monkey to be alone but its not so good for men to be alone.      The goal is to eschew these Neanderthal patterns still scene in the modern black families and  reach for the more laudable Macuna Matada goals endeared by the Africans as well as all other cultural groups.  Black is not African. The idea is that the majority of black people lost their language, religions culture and their God but for these afro aboriginals there was no such African language, religion or culture to lose.  there was nothing to lose in terms of identity except their Amerindian Aboriginal language and their maze. The one ship full of Africans that were brought here in reasonably comfortable  conditions to preserve them as merchandise lost much of their language overtime and blended into the great Creole American experience. We don't know who emerged white or black or Spanish or Angry Creole Dutch with no affinity to English but they seem to understand Columbus desire to have authority over the government and legally you do as the government is composed by the people so then you can make the government pay you the requisite legally required support that the government says it must pay each citizen.  Economic Logic has advised the government accordingly since you need people to maintain a population and that population is your consumer market.        Much of their African religion and family expectations involved Leviticus.  In other words, there is no point in complaining against systemic racism when the community is trouncing and negating itself systemically and biblically  within the confines of the ethnic minority home where the notion of the family with mother and father cooperating peaceably is considered by many in this community as anathema; repugnant anthropologically or possibly accidentally as a reverberation of Cosmopolitan culture that disdains shared or cooperative authority in any environment. The last anthropological disco volante affecting the post Port Royal 1664 global Creole Anglo population is Columbus/Cabot dna that asks, "...how could there be any government with laws affecting authority over me and that teaches children to have more education  than me if we are Columbus; argh?" No matter what, in spite of evident ongoing John Joe Adam Joe piracy, we need government to ensure our individual mutual safety when unknowingly buying pirated stolen shipments of shoes or clothing etc or Boston English tea so  that we might enjoy the grey market goods bought mostly by grey market people who have income support from  economically obedient true capitalist Asian or European  economies in the Anglo world but no Anglo citizenship while they make up for the lack of  people within the Anglo economies, alack of people with the requisite support to maintain economic demand for robotically made goods made in China, Europe, Latin America, Africa or in America We need government  to enable the requisite support for people in all economies and the requisite sales tax at no less than 30% to fund these hard, cold economic objectives involving demand for goods made by machines where the machines are working while the people, as a result,  are not required to; affecting money supply in the people, buying power in the people and therefore also affecting the sale of goods.      Now, stop trying to buy properties with boxes of your squirrely cash Cheryl as saved from your hotel manager's job; especially when you don't know if the home is registered to the seller.  The real owner is on vacation. You need to be more human when it comes to property ownership; more Euro-African and less squirrelish; blackish. The ultimate goal is an unstoppable economy that is uninterrupted by any new upswings in automation where, even if there are fewer and fewer jobs, the people, all the people in all the pretty skin colors and cultures will have sufficient funding to remain in their own economies, shop, live and buy goods in the non racialized* capitalist truth and logic as not to move elsewhere to other economies for any rescue or humane support. The change measured in automation magnifying supply of goods required an equal and opposite change in the financial  power made readily available in each individual citizen's wallets, magnifying the consumer demand for goods.    All Anglos in the world are the Queen's sons and  daughters in that global Anglo culture and only those who fight the blessing possibly imagining themselves to be the real monarch as a bus driver in Washington DC or in Otario are under funding their segment of the global Anglo population.   Race and gender has nothing to do with what we expect of the treatment of individuals under this tolerant global culture.  Certainly many people with South Asian, Indian descent and African descent, some now multi generational West Indian, are a part of this Creole Anglo culture.  The West Indians are very good people except for an on going aboriginal civil war in the homes of some where the children are going forward technologically with education and the fathers and grandfathers may be trying to hold them back in a subtle aboriginal subconscious vendetta that becomes an aboriginal civil war in society. white or black, where they say the English or European should never have interrupted them and their way of life as aboriginals or there is the fear that they would look up to the children as more socially authoritative family if they could be a Librarian or McDonalds manager with the children going forward technologically with more formal uses of law for property ownership and family registrations; pirate problems also every now and again and some Napoleonic residue in some evidently difficult personalities from time to time.  Last, it seems that in spite of how many Sat-Nav enabled European vehicles certain servile people regardless of color, like Joe, may be invited to own and that they do enjoy, no matter how they may be reading books on the family and raising children, their first servile, servant experience with the concept of family in a home, not the bush or the yard,  overshadows all family dynamics involving their own relations so that they may fear their daughter's graduation will make the daughter the master or the social authority and the parent will become the servant,  murderously resenting doing as the daughter will say concerning what new requisite soap to use in the energy saving new toilet bowls,  resenting 'the doing as you are told' in another technological babel or technological upswing although the daughter's furor is to help and possibly the wedding is deciphered by the parents as an abandonment; the daughter is leaving servanthood to actually have a family of her own with a husband.  The aboriginal resentment of technology or of the need to take a learner's position in every new technological babel should not supersede the aboriginal agenda to ensure that, even if the America did kill aboriginal family once that the aboriginal regenerated in more children and births,  that the aboriginals keep pace with a world of burgeoning spaceman technology in which their acceptance is guaranteed yet knowledge through education, aids survival and helps fend off theft and trickery that may amount to theft of those big, big, huge aboriginal ancestral lands by white pirate white minded.   The melding of technologies and cultures that include aboriginal wisdoms and Levitical law as technology took place at Alexandria in Greece once with the Egyptians as the proverbial spacemen or at St. Ann's Bay with Columbus as the man from Mars so to speak with more advanced technologies than what the aboriginals had ever seen before is an ongoing truth and this change must be accepted as constant in the postmodern life, happening in various waves maybe every ten years in  the life of the average Western Hemispheric black or white aboriginal that we love dearly as family but the 'spaceman' who comes to say you need help or that offers help might be your grandson that should not be murdered or resented if he can help and who can build his own remote control voice activated android kit toy very soon that will be able to vacuum and answer the front door and pay the jerk chicken delivery driver whose name is Cain but this Cain or any Cain has no biblical protection from the blessing on the children of Abraham and is dead if he contravenes no matter where he wonders to and fro. Lastly, Cain is an aboriginal and he may have had many servile experiences to teach him to do as he is told by the creators to be accepted instead of arguing and while there are many hurts that we carry as aboriginals, Cain must learn to write his story down or communicate it orally as a stand up story teller or a preacher instead of communicating the ancestral experiences as the "grendel" weak only by killing and sabotaging one's own family in fear of cultural abandonment or fear of cultural disloyalty in asking how could you or anyone talk about a constitution that has power to rule Grendel?    I love Jerk chicken;...mmm..good!!    I have to be adopted though; I have to be adopted. Read more.  

This is a graduation celebration of Grace Acompen and her real son but she keeps throwing my books away that I need for school and she throws my job offers away or gives them to a black shim like Johnette Brown  or Horacewald to have  authority over me.   

According to Gino G. Raymond at the University of Bristol,

One of the assumptions embedded in the multicultural ethos in England is that if one is to succeed in building a cohesive national community out of a society characterised by ever-growing diversity, then it is vital to recognise ethnic and cultural specificity. There is one context, however, where that recognition has become problematized, due to the fear of stigmatising entire communities. One of the recurrent leading stories in the media since the beginning of the decade has been child sexual abuse, and in particular the grooming of teenage girls under the age of consent for sexual exploitation by gangs of men. A series of such rings was uncovered by the police, spreading down from the deprived cities of the north such as Bradford and Rotherham, down through Derby and Telford, and even reaching the affluent south in the city of Oxford. In May 2012, the highly mediatised guilty verdicts returned against 9 men for running a child sexual exploitation ring in Rochdale, highlighted the common thread linking the cases in the other town mentioned above: the rings were all led by, and almost entirely comprised of, Asian Muslim men. 

Mindful of the potential for this fact to be seized on and exploited by groups hostile to community cohesion, Greater Manchester police were at pains to elide any ethnic or cultural factors in terms of the motivation for this crime. There was, their spokesperson asserted: ‘no racial element to the case […] the main issue was older men exploiting vulnerable young girls’.1 The reaction of the Labour MP for Rochdale, Simon Danczuk, quoted in the same BBC report, was to retort that it would be ‘daft not to believe that race plays a part’ in the grooming. But the dangers of singling out individual communities had been amply demonstrated during the course of the previous year and may have been a factor influencing the discretion of the police and the prosecuting authorities.

However, the system does help people.  During my legal training to be a Solicitor in London, I had the opportunity to assist an Eastern European Ethnic minority refugee in London. The case that assisted him is Abdulrahman Mohamed V The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that involved the experiences of another Ethnic minority before the law with a local council and who was certainly assisted by a Superior Court ruling.  The law helped an ethnic minority. With first hand experience, it was my honor to assist.  Our first essay in completion of a a Graduate Law course in the year 1999-2000 was historical in many ways and addressed the police officer wearing a Turban and carrying his ceremonial knives to work as allowed by Scotland Yard.  

According to the UK website entitled  SikhPolice.org, 

Currently, the most senior Sikh Police Officer in the UK is Mewa Singh Sahota (Max) who was appointed Assistant Chief Constable in 2008.

Assistant Chief Constable Mewa Singh Sahota in 2004

Max was born in Coventry, England, his parents having emigrated from Hoshiarpur, Punjab, India around 1959. He joined Warwickshire Police in 1987 as a Constable and rose to the rank of Superintendent in 2001. On promotion to Chief Superintendent in 2004 he transferred to Coventry in West Midlands Police. On promotion to Assistant Chief Constable in 2008, he transferred to South Yorkshire Police. Max has been the Director International Policing at the UK College of Policing since 2014, where his role includes developing international relationships. http://www.sikhpolice.org/projects/2-uncategorised

See here below an Excerpt from the  Precedent setting judgement that I used personally to assist a client as the law helps people: the House of Lords case Abdulrahman Mohamed V The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham, [2001] UKHL 57 as handed down by LORD SLYNN OF HADLEY: 

17. Thus on this appeal it is accepted that the respondent was homeless, was eligible for assistance, had a privileged need and was not intentionally homeless. The question is accordingly whether it can be said that he had no local connection with the district of the appellant authority and in that regard the principal question is whether it can be said that he is, or in the past was, normally resident in the district of that authority. The authority's principle argument is that the occupation of interim accommodation pending a decision of his application under the Act is not (ie cannot be) "normal residence" for the purposes of section 199(1)(a) of the Act. The respondent has lost his normal residence and has asked for and was given only temporary shelter until replacement accommodation is provided. At the relevant time accordingly he had no normal residence so that he could not establish a local connection on the ground of residence. For that purpose "normally resident" is to be given the same meaning as ordinarily resident. In R v Barnet London Borough Council, Ex p Shah [1983] 2 AC 309, 343 which was concerned with ordinary residence it was said that that phrase referred to:

"a man's abode in a particular place or country which he has adopted voluntarily and for settled purposes as part of the regular order of his life for the time being, whether of short or of long duration".

    18. It is clear that words like ordinary residence and normal residence may take their precise meaning from the context of the legislation in which they appear but it seems to me that the prima facie meaning of normal residence is a place where at the relevant time the person in fact resides. That therefore is the question to be asked and it is not appropriate to consider whether in a general or abstract sense such a place would be considered an ordinary or normal residence. So long as that place where he eats and sleeps is voluntarily accepted by him, the reason why he is there rather than somewhere else does not prevent that place from being his normal residence. He may not like it, he may prefer some other place, but that place is for the relevant time the place where he normally resides. If a person, having no other accommodation, takes his few belongings and moves into a barn for a period to work on a farm that is where during that period he is normally resident, however much he might prefer some more permanent or better accommodation. In a sense it is "shelter" but it is also where he resides. Where he is given interim accommodation by a local housing authority even more clearly is that the place where for the time being he is normally resident. The fact that it is provided subject to statutory duty does not, contrary to the appellant authority's argument, prevent it from being such.

    19. Although the point is not conclusive counsel for he respondent are entitled as they do to point to the fact that Parliament has specifically provided in section 199 that residence due to service in the armed forces or through detention under statutory powers is not "of choice" and the Secretary of State may specify other circumstances in which residence in a district is not to be treated as of a person's own choice, but nothing has been done to exclude residence under the homelessness provisions with which this appeal is concerned as not being of a person's own choice. If it had been intended to exclude such accommodation it would have been easy to have done so in the section or by the exercise of powers by the Secretary of State under section 119(5).

    20. The appellant authority contends that interim accommodation cannot lead to the creation of a local connection attributable to normal residence even "if a person is in interim accommodation for an extensive period, eg years" though it recognises that local connection through other factors specified (eg special circumstances) can arise during the occupation of interim accommodation. The authority says that to allow such interim accommodation to count as normal residence defeats the purpose intended by the Act. Such accommodation was not intended to give an applicant the chance to build up a local connection; to take such interim accommodation into account benefits those whose cases demand long inquiry to the disadvantage of those whose cases can be dealt with quickly.

    21. I agree with Henry LJ [2001] QB 97, 109, para 45 that although there is a re-distributive purpose to the Act, it has to be read with the other statutory purpose of providing for people to stay in a borough with which they have established a local connection and that there is no overriding reason or principle why interim accommodation should not count as normal residence for that purpose.

    22. In R v Eastleigh Borough Council, Ex p Betts [1983] 2 AC 613, 628 Lord Brightman stressed that "the real exercise will be to decide whether the normal residence has been such as to establish a subsisting local connection". In my opinion the occupation of interim accommodation can be taken into account in deciding whether such a local connection exists.

    23. A second question which has been raised is whether the correct date to decide whether a person has a local connection is the date of the making of his application or the date of the decision or, if there is a review, the date of the review. It seems to me plain that since the question for the local housing authority is whether the applicant "has a local connection" that must mean such a connection at the date of decision or review, whether in the meantime the applicant has acquired or lost (by moving away) his local connection.

    24. A linked question which arises is as to the material which may be looked at on the review. The appellant authority contends that the reviewing officer may look at facts known to the original decision maker and those which existed before the time of the original decision but were not known to the original decision maker but he may not look at facts which have come into existence subsequently. The respondent on the other hand says that the reviewing officer can and should look at all the circumstances at the time of the review. In R v Southwark London Borough Council, Ex p Hughes (1998) 30 HLR 1082, in a case decided under the Housing Act 1985, before a statutory right of review was given, Turner J said, at p 1089:

"It may be thought therefore that there are compelling reasons why the circumstances of an individual, at the time the inquiry is carried out and the decision is made, must be the circumstances which the housing authority is required to investigate for the purposes of coming to their decision whether or not the applicant is homeless".

    25. The present case is not concerned with whether the applicant tenants were homeless but whether there was a connection with Hammersmith or whether the applicants had a connection with Ealing and not with Hammersmith. It seems to me, however, plain that the approach should be as stated by Turner J and perhaps with more force since there is now a statutory right of review. I find nothing in the statutory language which requires the review to be confined to the date of the initial application or determination. The natural meaning of the language in section 184(2) in requiring the local housing authority to inquire whether the applicant "has" a local connection is that they should consider that at the date of the review decision. It is to be remembered that the process is an administrative one at this stage and there can be no justification for the final administrative decision of the reviewing officer to be limited to the circumstances existing at the date of the initial decision.

    26. The decision of the reviewing officer is at large both as to the facts (ie as to whether the three conditions in section 198(2) of the Act are satisfied) and as to the exercise of the discretion to refer. He is not simply considering whether the initial decision was right on the material before it at the date it was made. He may have regard to information relevant to the period before the first decision but only obtained thereafter and to matters occurring after the initial decision.

    27. As already shown the reviewing officer took into account in his letter whether there had been an essential compassionate, social or support need. The Court of Appeal held that this was a clear misdirection in law. Requiring that the applicant must show an essential compassionate, social or support need to live in the district was putting the test for local connection too high.

    28. The appellant authority contends that this was not a separate test but an overall review of all the other matters which had been considered as to whether local connection by reference to special circumstances had been shown and that accordingly there was no misdirection. There is some force in this but it seems to me that the reviewing officer was using this additional test as part of his consideration as to whether there was a local connection by reason of special circumstances. On that basis as I understand it the appellant authority accepts that there was a misdirection as the Court of Appeal held. I agree with the Court of Appeal on this matter.

    29. I would accordingly dismiss the appeal.

LORD STEYN

My Lords,

    30. I have read the opinion of my noble and learned friend, Lord Slynn of Hadley. For the reasons he gives I would also dismiss the appeal.

LORD HOFFMANN

My Lords,

    31. I have had the advantage of reading in draft the speech of my noble and learned friend, Lord Slynn of Hadley. For the reasons he gives I would also dismiss the appeal.

LORD HUTTON

My Lords,

    32. I have had the advantage of reading in draft the speech of my noble and learned friend, Lord Slynn of Hadley. For the reasons he gives, and with which I agree, I would also dismiss this appeal.

LORD HOBHOUSE OF WOODBOROUGH

My Lords,

    33. For the reasons given by my noble and learned friend, Lord Slynn of Hadley, I agree that this appeal should be dismissed.

We also had the honor of assisting ethnic minorities in Court on several occasions with other Counsel in the Common Law Courts.   About  ten years after our very first experience in London, we assisted the Caribana Arts Group win a motion defending their right to decide when an how the Caribana trademark would be used; with their permission.  The City of Toronto conceded the motion for the most part while the Judge made his own order confirming their punitive right to damages. I was Counsel with the Angel Ronan Firm that drafted, served and filed the winning motion and appeared in Court personally to assist these trademark owners against the post modern rise of the Buccaneers.   See an excerpt from the article below that confirms the result and that we were in Court to assist: 

Don't call it Caribana - Toronto festival forced to find new moniker

By DAN ROBSON AND NICKI THOMAS STAFF REPORTERS

Tues., May 17, 2011

• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 

For now, just call it the festival formerly known as Caribana.

Toronto’s massive mid-summer Caribbean celebration is being renamed.

nmepjp

The popular Caribana festival can no longer use the name because it is trademarked by a group that founded the event but no longer runs it. (COLIN O'CONNOR / TORONTO STAR)

Last Thursday, the Ontario Superior Court ruled under file CV-11-422701  that it can no longer use the name Caribana because it is trademarked by a group that founded the festival, but no longer runs it. The CAG owns the name and received assistance from Warren A. Lyon at the Angel Ronan Firm in  obtaining a Court order to prevent the use of the name. 

“There is no change to the festival,” said Chris Alexander, chief administrative officer of the Festival Management Committee, which has run Caribana for the past five years. “The only thing that has changed is the name.

“And people will still call it that.”

But behind the Caribana name change, there’s an ongoing struggle for control over the massively popular celebration.

In 2006, the city and province cut funding to Caribana after organizers failed to produce adequate financial statements.

Control was transferred from the Caribbean Cultural Committee (CCC), which started the festival in 1967, to the newly created Festival Management Committee (FMC).

After the transfer, the festival was officially called the Toronto Caribbean Carnival.

In 2007, Alexander said, the FMC was given permission to use the Caribana name by lawyer Charlie Roach, then chair of the CCC. (The Star was unable to reach Roach for comment.)

But the Caribana trademark remains with the Caribana Arts Group, successor of the founding organization.

Henry Gomez, the Caribana Arts Group’s current chair, said the organization was forced to take the FMC to court because control of the cultural tradition had been stripped from their hands.    

The FMC) were supposed to run the festival for one year only,” he said. “Since 2007, we’ve made innumerable attempts, but they’ve refused to acknowledge our ownership.

“We created it, conceptualized, nurtured, managed and produced it for 39 years. And we still own it.” Warren A. Lyon with the   Angel Ronan Firm in Toronto is the Litigator assisting them who brought the successful motion under file CV-11-422701 to prevent the use of the Caribana name and trademark. His father Tom Lyon is a Toronto Police Officer and his mother is a Real Estate agent. He has two siblings; Lee-Anne and Victor. 

While plans are still in place to run Caribana under a new name this summer, Gomez said the Caribana Arts Group will do everything in its power to prevent the festival from going forward."  Mr. Ted Copelecci represented the other side but refused to accept the result and committed contempt of Court by trying to write his own order, threatening the Judge and the Court; itself.  

We had also assisted a Guyanese ethnic minority charged with a double assault.  The charges were withdrawn using the jurisprudence involving the competition of oaths with all other evidence, corroborating the accused's story and  confirming that no assault had taken place. See an excerpt of the motion here: 

TeTestimony  of victims:Testimony of  the  whoreish friend  is not proof of touching or of the elements of the offence. Her testimony is not proof of sexual interference in that it is conflicted,  self-contradictory and shows signs of coaching by the  Investigating officer.  There is no case to answer as the accused cannot even begin to
 reasonably account for his time over a three year span which includes 1095 days and 26280 hours so as to provide a full and answer and defense to a case which now stands as unknowable.   There is no case to answer as there is no evidence of  the unlawful  touching of another contrary to the Queen's peace or interference of a specific nature to warrant prosecution.  There is a lot of evidence, however of Joe committing assaults on the campaign trail with Barracks as he tells people America is just an idea as he justifies his abuse of power and then his misuse of constitutional  authority.  How can he have any constitutional authority if he abused power  while asking for his many favors as a killer to save him.  I suppose we will pray for America to be a more vociferous and tangible idea.  Joe's presidency is dead when American lives are not an idea. They seem to be rather real and tangible with heart beats.  Good bye Joe. Take your money and go.    You have to be a dyslexic German who cannot just follow the German economy and enjoy the emotion of German socioeconomics and German Hegemony with Budweiser, Levis and Volkswagen selling more vehicles if you would just follow; so  good bye.  You are an animal Joe; a poor white minded who is being arrested for his treasonous economic double minded  policy.  Try and blame it on Bush now.  

Th
R.  R v. Hutchinson, 2010 NSCA …..(A_-A_), p.29
R v. G.R., [2005] 2 S.C.R. 371, 2005 SCC 45
R v. Legere, 1995  1551 (ON C.A.)

9.  If the Crown onus cannot be met, there is no case to answer.  There is no need to address the credibility of accused and complainant.
10.  Oath v Oath jurisprudence is simply the summary of tests of competing credibility but such notions do not circumvent the duty of the Crown to meet their onus or tender evidence to satisfy the Crown onus except when there is evidence of the Actus Reus and Mens Rea. When there is evidence of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, the oaths can compete.  An oath is not evidence to meet the onus or proof that rises to a standard to satisfy the burden of providing evidence as in R v. Parmenter that goes beyond a reasonable doubt when taken in the police cruiser but it maybe so when taken at the front desk at the station but it all depends if there is a fire retardant door through which the evidence is heard. It is hard to be sure of anything said through a fire retardant door.  Such evidence alone as heard through a fire retardant door, being equivocal,  cannot be tendered as evidence to satisfy the very onus or burden on the Crown to prove a touching as set out in R. v. Ewanchuk [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330.

To see how the law protects ethnic and religious expression at the work place, we can look forward to more cases guided The employment Act 1989 that confirms turban-wearing Sikhs are exempt from the need to wear head protection in the workplace.

See Sections 11 and 12 of the Employment Act 1989 as amended by Section 6 of the Deregulation Act 2015 exempts turban-wearing Sikhs from any legal requirement to wear head protection at a workplace. 

Religious clothing and symbols in employment as published by the EU, Legitimate aims are public order in accommodating difference but ensuring public safety As such, the aim of public order has been held to be; 

file:///C:/Users/Guest/Downloads/Religiousclothingandsymbolsinemployment%20(2).pdf

....Engaged in some of the ECtHR cases regarding the wearing of religious clothing or symbols and this aim includes the argument that bans are necessary to preserve the secular nature of the state. In Sahin v Turkey, for example, a student of medicine at the University of Istanbul was refused access to exams because she was wearing the Islamic headscarf. The ECtHR found the interference with Ms Sahin’s Article 9 ECHR right to be justified, among other reasons, for the protection of public order because ‘this religious symbol [the Islamic headscarf] had taken on political significance in Turkey in recent years’ and because there were ‘extremist political movements in Turkey which seek to impose on society as a whole their religious symbols and conceptions of a society founded on religious precepts’.60 Public order was also accepted as a legitimate aim for limitations in Kervanci v France and Dogru v France, Aktas and Others v France (all concerning school pupils and what they could or could not wear in public education in France) and Kurtulmus v Turkey (concerning a university professor who wanted to wear an Islamic headscarf against the dress rules of a public university).61 Of these cases, only the latter concerned a ban on the wearing of religious symbols in employment. Legitimate aims: protection of health The protection of health could play an important role in relation to employment. For example, the wearing of hard hats on building sites is a safety measure which could interfere with the wearing of a Sikh turban, although there does not seen to be any problem with wearing hard hats together with, for example, 56 Nolan and K v Russia, App. No. 2512/04, 12 February 2009, para 73. 57 Nolan and K v Russia, para 73. 58 S.A.S. v France, App. No. 43835/11, 1 July 2014. 

59 S.A.S. v France, para. 139. 60 Sahin v Turkey, Chamber, paras 108-109, confirmed by Grand Chamber, para. 115. 61 Kervanci v France and Dogru v France; Aktas and Others v France, App. Nos 43563/08; 14308/08, 18527/08, 29134/08, 25463/08, and 27561/08, 30 June 2009; Kurtulmus v Turkey, App. No. 65500/01, 24 January 2006. 34 Religious clothing and symbols in employment Jewish skullcaps or Islamic headscarves. In the UK, the law exempts Sikhs from the legal duty to wear head protection at work. The protection of health played a role in Chaplin v the United Kingdom, where a nurse wanted to wear a small crucifix on a chain with her nurse’s uniform. The reason why the Law Society of Upper Canada is dead is because they lied about not knowing whether many counsel had insurance. How could you not know if counsel had insurance? The Law Society of Upper Canada was shut to protect the public from the ongoing misfeasance in public office. Many people were arrested and charged for this contempt of Court and the uttering of false statements; embarrassing animalian white people who thought they would turn the Court and society* into a barnyard with their 1/3 dog dna or 1/3 monkey dna  with a teaspoon of this blood put in the womb in the last trimester of gestation  as a rather squirrelly, inconsistent  particular West Indian servant genome.  They are given a minimum income support at $70,000.00 USD( approximately   £ 50,000.00 pounds)  in any Commonwealth territory or former Commonwealth territory  where a West Indian has exercised political and economic authority as animals like Joe who walk upright  know how to feed themselves and recognise the money as being important for everyone; right Joe?   

 The ECtHR held that the employer was justified in requiring Ms Chaplin to take off her necklace and crucifix in order to protect the health and safety of both nurses and patients in a hospital. In this case, there was evidence that the employer had, for the same reasons, also informed two Sikh nurses that they could not wear a bangle or kirpan and had prohibited flowing hijabs.62 In the Netherlands, a Muslim nurse was dismissed after she refused to follow the hospital rules that nurses in the dialysis unit could not wear long sleeves. The rule was introduced to avoid infection and followed national guidelines and the District Court deciding the case held that this rule was necessary, proportionate and justified.63 It will be clear that workplace rules which prohibit the wearing of loose and or flowing clothing or of items of jewellery, even if these are worn for religious reasons, could, in certain work circumstances, also be justified for the protection of health and safety. Although the hospital, in Chaplin v the United Kingdom, prohibited the wearing of flowing hijabs for the protection of health and safety, it allowed Muslim doctors to wear a close-fitting ‘sports’ hijab for this reason.64 Another example from the UK is the case of Dhinsa v Serco, where a refusal to allow a Sikh man who was a trainee prison officer to wear his kirpan (a ritual dagger) was held to be justified, because the restriction was appropriate and necessary for the maintenance of prison security and the safety of staff, visitors and prisoners.65 

Lyon children in the UK. 

 

We have to accept that there is an animalian subhuman genome among us that will confuse intellectual property belonging to another to sand on a beach that is actually public property while they believe anyone can help themselves to this sand.  

This Animalian subhuman genome is calling America an idea, the easy working of the Constitution an idea that defies the power of men to work and agree to run chess games, hockey tournaments, political contests and economies in accordance with life saving rules. The animal said he is willing to kill to take the podium, the seat and win. This could never happen at the Superbowl; not in America; right?    The rules of politics and the rules governing automation economies  with a universal unconditional minimum income support work in Germany, Spain or France or on the ISS but not in America. They work for the protection of health and safety.      However, rules work for the chess tournaments at the White House that now take place daily because we have to have authority over the subhuman genomes among us, threatening us all until God will arrest them and explain the power of Icelandic Grendel blood put in Joe's mother's womb making him obstinate while we confuse this with determination.  Joe, however, has finally conceded that the 1929 depression need not have happened when the Massachusetts or Vermont dole system would have saved the nation and also America as a rather tangible idea when you have millions of ideal citizens in this American idea, dying in a potentially ideal economy that should not happen if you followed the idea of the dole for all citizens and evidently the idea works.  What is the point of telling people that you and your animalian kind need to rob a bank because you "need to eat" if you won't follow the little ideas that would make the larger idea of America work? It is evident that you need to eat Joe. We all need to eat. But the Massachusetts dole system dating back to 1608 works to ensure that all citizens in America can eat and that the economy does not devolve into an unnecessary, wasteful depression. Roll out that system right across America like you would roll out a phone network. Call it the 21st Century Joe national benefit system. Advise your immediate North American neighboring countries to follow along. Do you have your monthly Joe?  If you do, lets get an Amtrak pass and tour America for three weeks? We can check our email accounts on our T Mobile data packages or the train wifi for Zoom video call job interview requests or just sign up for the national job core; right Joe? Holland has a job core. You look kind of Dutch sometimes but you think like a scalawag. That is very hard to do  for 70 years if you are not really a West Indian scalawag; black or white.     We could also go to Ireland and afford a Marriot Bonvoy account. 

 It follows that the  New 1920's industrial automation occasioned a joblessness that reduced consumer demand that further reduced orders for all kinds of goods and products, that increased further a reduction in any need for labor with no orders for new consumer goods of any kind.    The dole would have kept people afloat and the demand for all kinds of new machine made goods afloat also.  The state, by allowing Rights claims, provides for its own acceptance through its own logical form. The state allows individuals to pursue their purposive rational action using existing laws instrumentally. Universal unconditional minimum income support is a Right pursuant to the UDHR article 25 or the OHCHR Article 11. It is the ultimate rights claim as guaranteed by the UK law that certainly governs the lives of citizens in all of Canada pursuant to the British North America Act and the Criminal Code of Canada.   All treaty making power rests in the Queen only. How could her Canadian people resist her socioeconomics?      Sales tax above 20% covers this essential economic benefit and provides a surplus for all other government expenses. This is where the animals put pure economic benefit above all animalian motivations that manifest as hate or friendly affectionate ignorance that camouflages covert animalian resistance of the master European authority. With respect to animals, we carry a duality of natures and we can always choose not to follow our most animalian motivations but everyone of us has them.   Knowledge helps; knowledge as obtained through education.         This encourages and fosters legitimacy by allowing citizens to appeal for new laws which will legitimate actions considered legally irrational or deviant under the current law but they cannot succeed for very long since they contravene basic peace, civility and natural law such that they are contrary to the state's purpose in fostering peace and good government. The reason why God gave us natural law as embodied in the ten commandments is so that there would be sufficient peace, settlement and commodious living so that men could turn their minds to defying the natural laws of gravity and build an airplane. Without such laws, his mind is engaged in defending his simple breath in civil wars and conflict.   The laws relating to homosexuality is an example, mercy killing, or the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes are other examples. The citizenry accepts the legitimacy of legal domination because it allows for the instrumental use of the system to fulfill the purposive actions of the subjective will formally and argumentatively redeemed within the legal system. Here one can understand what Habermas meant when he said that the "modern legal order can draw its legitimacy only from the idea of self-determination since the post-traditional morality, post 1960's, supplies a substitute for the natural law that is grounded in religion and metaphysics (Habermas, 1996). The substitute is essentially natural law as found in the workings of society itself and basic human needs that are based on various basic moral values that safeguard and buttress society and that are synonymous with the very religious values that reflect them. Albeit, it is an imperfect world but parents and their children would prefer protection from ice cream with lead in it. So, Here, one also sees the fulfillment of law's self-justifying characteristics. By virtue of its instrumentality, citizens are able to understand themselves as authors of the law to which they are subject as addressees (Habermas, 1996). This confirms the meaningfulness of the value of human life as argued by Habermas.  Whether its Joe or some other individual who may resist to allow the light of his own experiences to dawn on him as he watches all the malls and towns that have closed in the continually receding American economy, we must also understand the power of influence in historical figures that may be able to possibly , in artificial life states, still influence our socioeconomics destructively with the myth that under education for the masses will guarantee economic success. Simply put, it may be John A. Macdonals of Danada who is only trying to be equal in making the masses more like him, thereby diminishing his own sense of under attainment or under qualification and this selfish personal agenda is just a rut in the economy. Could a mass of people in any population be so loyal to a rut to actually see their economy die in honor of that pothole, that pit and the rut in a subconscious kind of tribal defiance?   The absence of a consistent income support policy across the entire Danadian economy or the Us economy is unusual much like a modern nation without hot and cold running water for all of its citizens as this lack of consistent economic policy creates a sense of detachment from the larger global capitalist agenda. It is awkward; unusual. Even if everyone finished school in grade 10 and was able to just choose to be a mechanic or a ship captain or teacher without further education, we would still need hot and cold running water and a universal unconditional income support for the economy.   

Law has changed more since 1970 as well since rape was recognized evidently as the sphere of female/feminine  authority or the female mind in various sociological studies. The word "female" leaves a great deal of room for definitional import in this discussion but the point is that it is amorphous and other than the purposeful maternal or paternal being. Rape victims, male or female, are not buck or doe sacrifices. It is not a male brain that rapes but a female/feminine brain in any being; including a genetic male. The genuine maternal love, a daughter's love or wife's love is understood separately and works with the male who respects the female.    The properly constituted male with a male brain honors, respects and protects the female and the female form.   Potiphar raped Joseph by leaving her door open and he refused to participate.  The properly constituted male is a protector and steward. He does not take advantage.   Human beings have no other expectation. But, animals seem to respect a guttural reaction to an open door.  The expectations are evident. The bible is in every child.  It is within their program.  Society is structured accordingly and various expectations or controls to remind us of our most basic humanity under the law. They are not only controlled by the legal bars of the iron cage, the system allows them to discuss, on some level, the extent of control as well as the need for the protection of their autonomy under the resources of the state. Here is Habermas' discursively achieved agreement between state and citizen. Laws or changes within them are the fulfilment of the discursively achieved agreements. It is the rule of the absolute Monarch in natural law and its legitimacy that the people should have the peace of the Magna Carta and this entails the work to hunt down those officials and citizens who resist the simple peace it offers in preserving the meaningfulness of human life. This is the purpose of all State law and action. The is the authority. This is the legitimacy.    These individuals  and officials challenge authority and peace and are efficiently neutralized by the Monarch and Queen.    Every "rights" claim is answered through the instrumental use of law. People are claiming rights more today than they were pre-1960. Because of this law has changed more, becoming more instrumental post 1960. Some Examples of this in the U.K include the Race Relations Act 1976 as well as the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and the Equal Pay Act 1970. Other examples include the Slaughter of Poultry Act, 1967 ( halal meat for Muslims) and the Motor-Cycle Crash Helmets (Religious Exemption) Act, 1976 ( for Sikhs). The ECHR becomes law in the U.K. in August 2 . — - -  The role of the E.U. in English jurisprudence is evidenced further by the ECJ being an additional tier in the English Appellate Court system that will still include, by necessity, the House Of Lords in the format of the Supreme Court Of The United Kingdom.  However, the  UK courts do not have to follow every determination of the EU courts on the grounds that the position of the ECJ or ECHR is incompatible with UK legislation.   If there is a determination or declaration of incompatibility, the EU law will be applied in a manner that is compatible with governing UK law until the UK legislation can be amended to satisfy EU treaty requirements to ensure there is no undue incompatibility affecting the lives of all EU citizens that will include all individuals born or domiciled in the U.K. as EU citizens.





R. v. Horcastle & Ors.. confirms this position in the EU. This includes the UK evidently.   Without a doubt, there is no loss of legal tradition but a harmonizing in the respect for law as an expression of culture, localized traditions and expectations.  EU membership does not prevent this respect of culture. But, we must be careful with efforts at Revisionist history that may sow false notions of both culture and history in the minds and souls of the current impressionable, gullible swivel group in the population who do not work very hard also known as the general tv viewing audience. Some popular situation dramas since 2007 are examples of poorly done, inaccurate, irresponsible revisionist history.  The goal is to remain FRODO( Finding Reality On Dvd Tv Box One); that is finding the reality of English culture on dock or channel one where your emotions and your mind should be docked.   How could any foreign population; possibly  Mulatto West Indians with native arawak dna , not pict dna,  decide how to flout the legislation if there was no English Crown? They seem to wish to suggest that some people in the population regardless of the intentions of the actual white people who drafted the legislation must have the position to misapply the legislation with racial import so that they can say some citizens were not white enough to benefit from the non-racialised intention of the law.   What purpose would they have in life if it was not for intercepting communications and working as Gremlins in the Brit Milah?  The administration of law has become more stringent as a result  in light of this open inward domestic terrorist threat that this population presents and this to prevent abuses and inefficiencies in administration. They will probably cause riots in England before their return to the West Indies since they hate part Pict native people and what they did to Arawaks with machine gun fire to exterminate large numbers of Arawaks in the West Indies. So, the Arawaks aimed to frustrate the colonial administration by stealing shipments and abusing the mail service. The English had to do everything twice and it became a redundancy.  Now, the West Indians in the administration followed the same practice in England. They use various wiles to achieve their goal.  The stringent application of law is to ensure legislative enforcement so that there is no racial import in governmental administration and the application of legal principles so that we may have civil society. 

Commenting on this phenomenon, Lord Philips has stated the following in a recent judgement;

"...that although the requirement to take into account the Strasbourg jurisprudence would "normally result" in the domestic court applying principles that are clearly established by the ECtHR "There will, however, be rare occasions where the domestic court has concerns as to whether a decision of the Strasbourg court sufficiently appreciates or accommodates particular aspects of our domestic process. In such circumstances, it is open to the domestic court to decline to follow the Strasbourg decision, giving reasons for adopting this course".  See  the judgement in the update.

Our analysis continues but before delving into any further insights from learned writers, let us reflect on a warning provided by some other thinkers.   Menski has highlighted these warnings in his recent work:

 But do lawyers care to read Habermas? Do they appreciate that Critical Theory is more than a cleverly worded, often shallow critique of legal failures to achieve standards of justice, increasingly measured today against certain presumed and asserted international criteria? Are we aware that Jacques Derrida famously called justice something that is always in the making, literally à venir? Earlier wise warning voices, for example Rudolph Stammler in the nineteenth century and Eugen Ehrlich (1913; 1936) at the start of the twentieth century, were drowned out by the remarkable shift away from natural law towards Weberian rationality, privileging various forms of state-centric legal positivism. This has been leading to rather self-serving claims of state law to be ›the law‹, which have only more recently been challenged by the new fashion of international human rights law. The misguided presumption that more recent concepts have simply replaced older forms of law appear to follow evolutionist thinking in the style  of Sir Henry Maine. Positive law and now international human rights law as virtual cuckoos in the nest of comparative law, however, spell deep trouble for a more pluralist understanding of law as culture. It is not possible to assume that lessons from the Holocaust have been fully learnt if we continue to hear new horror stories of ethnic cleansing and elimination of all sorts of ›others‹ from various parts of the globe. Humanity as a whole seems to have learnt remarkably little. Or should we admit crucial disconnections between self-congratulatory sophistication of legal scholarship and continuing cruel realities of ›living law‹? Over time, legal scholarship may have become more sophisticated, but in the process the fashionable focus on only one type of law as the dominant law and the efforts to silence all the other types (for those, as we shall see, have not gone away) have clearly had pernicious consequences: Legal , From Plural Worlds of Law and The Search For Living Law; Dr. Werner Menski. 

In Conclusion, Law is culture as Leviticus proves to be a culture certainly next to the law of the pirate in the West Indies where a body, if it is found dead or motionless on a beach,  can be claimed by anyone.   Law is not only culture. It is  certainly also technology as enforced to avoid animalian, nasty, brutish, short conflict among men.   See Thomas Hobbes for more on this.   In our analysis, the tension between Leviticus, Magna Carta and Habeus Corpus on one side and the uncircumcised Philistines and the pirates manifests in resistance.  Resistance has three levels; one is the cultural hegemonic where the commonality of the Magna Carta is sufficient as shared culture but it is expected that an established culture will resist changes to its cultural foods, preserving its own Hegemony in one's home and kitchen; secondly resistance says you can never concede and  agree to the ubiquitous benefit seen in a wagon, wheel or fuel injection, resulting in the death of your people and culture. Lastly, resistance is an unrelenting public or insidious fight against the law man; the Oklahoma law man or the London city law man with the attack on the person's physical being and personal property.  

The world is going forward with new economic understanding; not backward but forward. 

There is no doubt that  ethnic minorities participate in all walks and realms of public life with the freedom to be football coaches, Law Directors of new or old companies  or criminals like Horwell if they so choose who only harass black people, burning their hair and their teeth when they believe they can achieve goals of all kinds above and beyond the self limiting expectations of a man named Horwell who says black people do not work in the city of London. But, they do. I am evidence as a banker and litigator.  You were 51 when this all began.   The system helps people and the role of counsel is to navigate them, all kinds of people,  through the system in the benefit of the legal establishment that is engaged in protecting life and property belonging to all citizens.   I could not be related to people who cannot be at peace with the fact that their relative helps people as a member of the Legal profession and as a practitioner  in three countries, working as In House Counsel.  There is a personal use medical marihuana exception for being in personal use amounts of weed and maybe you could buy amounts in bulk discreetly but if you are in possession of kilos, it might be difficult to convince people your intention is personal use under the "Bob Marley" exception.  You are selling weed that you claim to be loaning to people. A loan is a commercial transaction with intent for repayment and constitutes a transaction even if its a loan of 5 grams of weed that you bought in bulk as medical personal use marijuana. The loan constitutes trafficking; my good man.  You are the weakest link. 

 

Thank you.

Warren A. Lyon, Citizen and Legal Analyst, In House Counsel at Angel Ronan Lex Scripta.

Angel Ronan ™ also provides a personal butler  or driver service where we can discuss your legal and business questions.  I's good at most everything.   See our website for details. 

 .