See the two pictures below where copyright is reserved to Reaktion Books Ltd. Either picture depicts people who would implement the unconditional universal minimum income support if they had the opportunity to decide. In fact, they do. The man sitting on the chair is Scandinavian, watching a Samsung TV. There is an observable pattern around the world involving universal unconditional minimum income support. All countries are obligated but every country does not comply. The countries that do comply are not in debt to any other nation unless they are an English speaking nation. Many of the countries that do comply are quite large. Some of them are quite small. However, every major car producing nation with three or more car companies of its own is a universal unconditional minimum income support nation. England does not have its own car company. They are in debt. They have only begun regular compliance with the universal unconditional minimum income support in the last 12 months. America has one car company of its own. They do not comply. --- The issue and question is why is there any argument? The Latin American countries comply; all of them. Ireland complies. France complies. Italy complies. The Ukraine complies. Russia complies. Sweden complies. Belgium complies. Haiti complies. The Cayman Islands complies. Scotland complies. The OECD evidence confirms the pattern. There is evidence of resistant aboriginal peoples in North America who resisted 24 hour electricity. They also resisted the rail system. Today, resistance seems to be set on the monies to be guaranteed to every citizen for economic fulfilment to also protect them from the human savagery as occasioned by robotic automation. If you love yourself as a people or if you love the other nation who is a major car producer, then you will provide the people with the unconditional universal minimum income support as you can purchase more products, more food and provide the economy with more buying. --- When the North American wakes in the morning, part of his day must involve a decision or choice about identity. Evidently, North Americans are managing the lives of the North Americans who could be part native or native Latin American or part Italian or part French. A partial identity does not disable you from making pasta or tortillas or from understanding human hurt or disenfranchisement. You should treat others as you wish to be treated. The only issue is that if you dont have the universal unconditional minimum income support who do you blame or call as responsible except but the North American who is being resistant to the obligation, the requirement? The idea os that if he is tough on people by denying legal entitlements such as an unconditional universal minimum income support, then some authority is to accept him or some band or community. It could be his imagination but maybe it is a genetic imagination that if you resist in doing what the law requires with respect to ensuring UDHR liberties that you will be considered heroically tough on the people in your position of authority But, it nah make no sense. The people in Europe are not asking you to be tough so that you might be accepted by showing your toughness or by hindering your economy's economic capability or the capability of your own children. They are asking you to comply. Your compliance is the acceptance you seek. The Latin American natives in Latin American countries comply. The Europeans comply. Change your language maybe. Don't go anywhere. Then maybe everything will become as clear as crystal. The tension you feel is your war with logic.

See the two pictures below where copyright is reserved to Reaktion Books Ltd.  Either picture depicts people who would implement the unconditional universal minimum income support if they had the opportunity to decide.  In fact, they do.  The man sitting on the chair is Scandinavian, watching a Samsung TV.  

  

There is an observable pattern around the world involving universal unconditional minimum income support.  All countries are obligated but every country does not comply.   The countries that do comply are not in debt to any other nation unless they are an English speaking nation. Many of the countries that do comply are quite large.  Some of them are quite small. However, every major car producing nation with three or more car companies of its own is a universal unconditional minimum income support nation.  England does not have its own car company.  They are in debt. They have only begun regular compliance with the universal unconditional minimum income support in the last 12 months.  America has one car company of its own.  They do not comply.
---
The issue and question is why is there any argument? The Latin American countries comply; all of them.  Ireland complies.  France complies.  Italy complies.  The Ukraine complies.  Russia complies. Sweden complies.  Belgium complies. Haiti complies.  The Cayman Islands complies. Scotland complies.     The OECD evidence confirms the pattern. There is evidence of resistant aboriginal peoples in North America who resisted 24 hour electricity.  They also resisted the rail system.  Today, resistance seems to be set on the monies to be guaranteed to every citizen for economic fulfilment to also protect them from the human savagery as occasioned by robotic automation. If you love yourself as a people or if you love the other nation who is a major car producer, then you will provide the people with the unconditional universal minimum income support as you can purchase more products, more food and provide the economy with more buying. 
---
When the North American wakes in the morning, part of his day must involve a decision or choice about identity.  Evidently, North Americans are managing the lives of the North Americans who could be part native or native Latin American or part Italian or part French.  A partial identity does not disable you from making pasta or  tortillas or from understanding human hurt or disenfranchisement. You should treat others as you wish to be treated.    The only issue is that if you dont have the universal unconditional minimum income support who do you blame or call as responsible except but the North American who is being resistant to the obligation, the requirement?  The idea os that if he is tough on people by denying legal entitlements such as an unconditional universal minimum income support, then some authority is to accept him or some band or community. It could be his imagination but maybe it is a genetic imagination that if you resist in doing what the law requires with respect to ensuring UDHR liberties that you will be considered heroically tough on the people in your  position of authority
 But, it nah make no sense.     The people in Europe are not asking you to be tough so that you might be accepted by showing your toughness or by hindering your economy's economic capability or the capability of your own children.
They are asking you to comply. Your compliance is the acceptance you seek.   The Latin American natives in Latin American countries comply.  The Europeans comply. Change your language maybe. Don't go anywhere.   Then maybe everything will become as clear as crystal.   The tension you feel is your war with logic.