If England was as big as Canada, what would you do? It is as big as Canada. Canada is...England and you manage it and run it...to feed you with the same socioeconomic policies as England with a 30% sales tax and the same unconditional universal minimum income support as England. It is what you always did, what you always do. The Cheddar man and the Amerindian are certainly accepted in all colours, languages and creeds. It is rumoured that The UN and the EU as well as the UK have decided that the terms "Black" and "White" are illegal. The US government has concurred apparently as rumoured. The real question now is how long any major economy and its appendage economies will delay in implementing the unconditional universal minimum income support. The other question is the reason for the delay. You will have to implement the universal minimum income support eventually. There will be other politicians. The current politicians may as well take the glory for a set national enforced policy although the North Americans are way behind, years behind other nations such as France on this issue. Automation is increasing. As automation increases, the supply of money in the availability of the average consumer goes down. The sale of consumer items goes down. Collateral job losses go up in the retail, sales and general service industries. The need for a universal unconditional minimum income support goes up. How can you be a politician and you don't know these things? The pain of Americentric anthropology that centres on the great collision between the world of Euclid, the candle stick, the compass and the printed book or books and creeds begins for the majority of Amerindian souls of various complexions now and various shoe brands around 1850. You are still enduring the shock in the interruption of your world and the on going melding of cultures. Have you tried the new wild bull barbecue burger or the wild caught cod burger. What about the wild night stupor burger? The experience of shock is passed down genetically. You could take recreational drugs or you could swim a lot; read a bible with Amerindian characters more. Moses is named New Tide. Joshua is Cold Water and Jesus is Reigning Sun. It may take a while for you to understand the entire enterprise involving the economy and the requisite nature of an unconditional universal minimum income support. Simply put, every citizen and every President gets the money; the unconditional universal minimum income support as a shield against the ravage, savagery of robotic automation. The deliberate or subconscious motivations for delay or argument in applying the final solution as read in the unconditional universal minimum income support (See the UN Ilo Recommendations R202 ) as written by Hitler as his final solution in 1936 as seen in his secret diaries apparently will continue to plague observers with anthropological amazement and curiosity. Dr. Take A. Slogan.

If England was as big as Canada, what would you do?  It is as big as Canada. Canada is...England and you manage it and run it...to feed you with the same socioeconomic policies as England with a 30% sales tax and the same unconditional universal minimum income support as England.  It is what you always did, what you always do.  The Cheddar man and the Amerindian are certainly accepted in all colours, languages and creeds.

It is rumoured that The UN and the EU as well as the UK have decided that the terms "Black" and "White" are illegal.  The US government has concurred apparently as rumoured.

The real question now is how long any major economy and its appendage economies will delay in implementing the unconditional universal minimum income support.  The other question is the reason for the delay.  You will have to implement the universal minimum income support eventually.  There will be other politicians.  The current politicians may as well take the glory for a set national enforced policy although the North Americans are way behind, years behind other nations such as France on this issue.
Automation is increasing.  As automation increases, the supply of money in the availability of the average consumer goes down. The sale of consumer items goes down.  Collateral job losses go up in the retail, sales and general service industries.    The need for a universal unconditional minimum income support goes up. How can you be a politician and you don't know these things? The pain of Americentric anthropology that centres on the great collision between the world of Euclid, the candle stick, the compass and the printed book or books and creeds
begins for the majority of Amerindian souls of various complexions now  and various shoe brands  around 1850.   You are still enduring the shock in the interruption of your world and the on going melding of cultures.  Have you tried the new wild bull barbecue burger or the wild caught cod burger. What about the wild night stupor burger?  The experience of shock  is passed down genetically.  You could take recreational drugs or you could swim a lot; read a bible with Amerindian characters more.  Moses is named New Tide.  Joshua is Cold Water and Jesus is Reigning Sun. It may take a while for you to understand the entire enterprise involving the economy and the requisite nature of an unconditional universal minimum income support.   Simply put, every citizen and every President gets the money; the unconditional universal minimum income support as a shield against the ravage, savagery of robotic automation.
The deliberate or subconscious motivations for delay or argument  in applying the  final solution as read in the unconditional universal minimum income support (See the UN Ilo Recommendations R202 ) as written by Hitler as his final solution in 1936 as seen in his secret diaries apparently will continue to plague observers with anthropological amazement and curiosity.

Dr. Take A. Slogan.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment