You can plagiarise this but why would you? We have a good Monarchy and Monarchial system. The British North America Act 1867 demonstrates that we have a written constitution. However, there are people creating a polemic in the economy that challenges the logic of quiet capitalist consistent economic regeneration in the face of on going, consistent Automation. The economy with a Monarch seems to suggest that detractors are challenging the population to accept the Monarch as the priority and the people as a collateral appendage where any old kind of people will do. Yet, usually a people must exist and then the Monarch arises from many years of cultural semination and the growth of heritage; so to speak. A Monarch does not usually just appoint himself a Monarch and then find a population that will tolerate and support his usage of that population and their tax revenue; and economy where they would some how get very little in return to satisfy their daily needs while some people do in a system that pays only the transgender an automatic Income support when they turn 12 years old. Do you think that is normal? THE SUGGESTION or the bet IS THAT In the utmost confidence, the people over another two year period or 50 year period will never find a way to cooperate AMONGST THEMSELVES and implement the expected, needed Income support of £30,000.00 per citizen. YOUR LACKING IN POLITICAL COOPERATION IS NOT THE MONARCH'S IMMEDIATE CONCERN. Cooperation is a matter of the higher Human nature and maybe there were too many Cheddar cave men resurrections raised within the Gattaca system. YET IT IS CONCERNING ALTHOUGH HE HAS ENCOURAGED THE UNIVERSAL INCOME SUPPORT FOR ALL CITIZENS. IT IS THE African Monarch's LAW. ON A RELATED BUT ALTERNATIVE POINT, what if maybe King Saul designed the current popular discussion of the gospel as a matter of revenge on David's DNA and maybe King Saul's DNA is asking to be more important than the people; as a kind of accidental King Saul descendant and also Monarch. Maybe we are all King Saul DNA. Either way, Israel is important and we cannot say that the concept of Monarch takes precedence over the people and that it could be any kind of people will do and the people we have are too slow or "ENG" to ask for what is in necessity to be paid to them as an Income support. The gospel is different from the facts and truth recorded in Mathew, Mark, Luke and John. The gospel is the idea that someone should pay the price for my sins and this is how Saul would find peace; that David's DNA pays in his version and Saul does not feel so bad every day and then he goes up in the world again. Nothing changes in terms of text in the Geneva Bible but it is the way we teach it; about the sin and sin debt and sacrifice. Saul DNA says why would you pay for your sins forever when you can get someone else to take the blame for you at least in the way you communicate the gospel of Rabbi JESUS? Read Romans 7. Read Ephesians 5 and 1st John 1: 9. Psalms 51 ( you can't say David's sin debt was not paid), JOHN 3:16 SAYS BELIEVE IN HIM AS WE SEE HIM AS A SECOND JOSEPH AND A SON OF DAVID AND SOLOMON; "LUMINOUS BEINGS ARE WE"; as the movie says. This is the gospel really; of community and family and so....yes Mr.Big old bad, bad CAVE man; it is written, it is written down not to offend you when we see Jesus was just trying to tell you what you didn't already know instinctually and culturally about marriage or ownership or family structures and family boundaries. Jesus says this is my sister and you need to respect her as his sister. Ask his father for her hand in a betrothal and maybe the mother of Mary could not have a baby or maybe she could have a baby and the gospel remains as the gospel. Jesus was resurrected to teach us about sin all over the world as maybe Emperor Constantine; some say or He just floated up certainly to Heaven to sit by His father at His right side. Either way, I have thanked God, graduated and I thank God that I believe in Him according to John 3:16. What is your argument; maybe? What do you believe? I accept the gospels as they are written. This is the point of the discussion as Jesus taught the Romans and was a good Rabbi and Roman citizen. The sin debt is the debt that remains when sin is unconfessed. My father does not ask me to put my debt on someone else. He asks me to acknowledge Him and his feelings See 1st John 1:9 and acknowledge. This is how the debt is paid. It does not really say in the gospel that JESUS died on the cross as a penalty and sacrifice for all of man"s sins.

You can  plagiarise this but why would you? We have a good Monarchy and  Monarchial system.  The British North America Act 1867 demonstrates that we have a written constitution.   However,  there are people creating a polemic in the economy that challenges the logic of quiet capitalist consistent economic regeneration in the face of on going,  consistent Automation.   The economy with a Monarch seems to suggest that detractors are challenging  the population to accept the Monarch as the priority and the people as a  collateral appendage where any old kind of  people will do.   Yet, usually a people must exist and then the Monarch arises from many years of cultural semination and the growth of heritage; so to speak.   A Monarch does not usually just appoint himself a Monarch and then find a population that will tolerate  and support his usage of that population and their tax revenue; and economy where they would some how get very little in return to satisfy their daily needs while some people do in a system that pays only the transgender an automatic Income support when they turn 12 years old. Do you think that is normal?    THE SUGGESTION or the bet  IS THAT In the utmost confidence,  the people over another two year period or 50 year period will never find a way to cooperate AMONGST THEMSELVES and implement the expected, needed Income support of £30,000.00 per citizen. YOUR LACKING IN POLITICAL COOPERATION IS NOT THE MONARCH'S IMMEDIATE CONCERN.   Cooperation is a matter of the higher Human nature and maybe there were too many Cheddar cave men resurrections raised within the Gattaca system.   YET IT IS CONCERNING ALTHOUGH HE HAS ENCOURAGED THE UNIVERSAL INCOME SUPPORT FOR ALL CITIZENS. IT IS THE  African Monarch's LAW.   ON A RELATED BUT ALTERNATIVE POINT,  what if   maybe King Saul designed the current popular discussion of the gospel as a matter of revenge on David's DNA and maybe King Saul's DNA  is asking to be more important than the people; as a kind of accidental  King Saul descendant and also  Monarch. Maybe we are all King Saul DNA.  Either way, Israel is important and we cannot say that the concept of Monarch takes precedence over the people and that it could be any kind of people will do and the people we have are too slow or "ENG" to ask for what is  in necessity to be paid to them as an Income support.   The gospel is different from the facts and truth recorded in Mathew, Mark, Luke and John. The gospel is the idea that someone should pay the price for my sins and this  is how Saul would find peace; that David's DNA pays in his version and Saul does not feel so bad every day and then he goes up in the world again.  Nothing changes in terms of text in the Geneva Bible but it is the way we teach it; about the sin and sin debt and sacrifice.     Saul DNA  says why would you pay  for your sins forever when you can get someone else to take the blame for you at least in the way you communicate the gospel of Rabbi JESUS?  Read Romans 7. Read Ephesians 5 and 1st John 1: 9. Psalms 51 ( you can't say David's sin debt was not paid),   JOHN 3:16 SAYS BELIEVE IN HIM AS WE SEE HIM AS A SECOND JOSEPH AND A SON OF DAVID AND SOLOMON; "LUMINOUS BEINGS ARE WE"; as the movie says.       This is the gospel really; of community and family and so....yes Mr.Big old bad, bad CAVE man; it is written, it is written down not to offend you when we see Jesus was just trying to tell you what you didn't already know instinctually and culturally about marriage or ownership or family structures and family boundaries. Jesus says this is my sister and you need to respect her as his sister. Ask his father for her hand in a betrothal and maybe the mother of Mary  could not have a baby or maybe she could have a baby and the gospel remains as the gospel.  Jesus was resurrected to teach us about sin all over the world as  maybe Emperor Constantine; some say or He just floated up certainly to Heaven to sit by His father at His right side. Either way, I have thanked God,  graduated and I thank God that I believe in Him according to John 3:16. What is your argument; maybe?  What do you believe?  I accept the gospels as they are written. This is the point of the discussion as Jesus taught the Romans and was a good Rabbi and Roman citizen.       The sin debt is the debt that remains when sin is unconfessed.  My  father does not ask me to put my debt on someone else.  He asks me to acknowledge Him and his feelings   See 1st John 1:9 and acknowledge.  This is how the  debt is paid.           It does not really say in the gospel that JESUS died on the cross as a penalty and sacrifice for all of man"s sins.           

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment