Louis XVI and the Marie Antoinette were child hood friend's. She was born a boy and was not going to be able to consummate. By 10 years old, they wanted him to choose a bride who could consummate. He chose his friendship and rightly so. However, he found his apparatus missing and was handed a wooden prosthetic. They could not consummate and eventually, he found the biology in truth that made him decisive. There was nothing but excrement. He restarted his Kingdom in Normandy and they re attached his apparatus but he always spit first. Before they re attached it, he found a spout like a turkey baster and it helped. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.biography.com/.amp/news/marie-antoinette-children-louis-charles-marie-therese UPDATED: JUN 3, 2021 | ORIGINAL: OCT 18, 2019 What Happened to Marie Antoinette’s Children? The French Revolution tore the queen apart from her surviving offspring. BY BARBARA MARANZANI Photo: Photo12/Universal Images Group via Getty Images Marie Antoinette has been portrayed as the spendthrift wife who meddled in the political affairs of her weak-willed husband, Louis XVI. But she was also a devoted mother to her four children, who provided emotional solace for the troubled queen. The French Revolution would tear France — and Marie’s family — apart, leading to the deaths of Louis, Marie and their son, and leave their sole surviving child to cope with the trauma and tragedy of family’s fate. Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette struggled to start a family The 15th of 16 children born to Austrian Empress Maria Theresa and Holy Roman Emperor Francis I, Marie was betrothed to the heir to the French throne while still a child. The couple wed in 1770 when she was just 14 and Louis just 15. The newlyweds both knew that Marie’s primary duty as a wife was to produce a male heir. But the marriage went unconsummated for several years, due to either a physical issue on Louis’ part or a psychological one. Royal courts were notoriously gossipy, none more-so than intrigue-filled Versailles, and Marie and Louis were harangued with advice and criticism about their supposed biological “failure” — with Marie’s brother dispatched to give the young king some step-by-step sexual advice.

Louis XVI and the Marie Antoinette were child hood friend's. She was born a boy and was not going to be able to consummate.  By 10 years old, they wanted Louis to choose a bride who could consummate.  He chose his friendship and rightly so. However, he found his apparatus missing and was handed a wooden prosthetic. They could not consummate and eventually, he found the biology in truth that made him decisive. There was nothing but excrement. He restarted his Kingdom in Normandy and they re attached his apparatus but he always spit first. Before they re attached it, he found a spout like a turkey baster and it helped. 



 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.biography.com/.amp/news/marie-antoinette-children-louis-charles-marie-therese

 | 

What Happened to Marie Antoinette’s Children?

The French Revolution tore the queen apart from her surviving offspring.
BY BARBARA MARANZANI

Photo: Photo12/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Marie Antoinette has been portrayed as the spendthrift wife who meddled in the political affairs of her weak-willed husband, Louis XVI. But she was also a devoted mother to her four children, who provided emotional solace for the troubled queen.

The French Revolution would tear France — and Marie’s family — apart, leading to the deaths of Louis, Marie and their son, and leave their sole surviving child to cope with the trauma and tragedy of family’s fate. 

Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette struggled to start a family

The 15th of 16 children born to Austrian Empress Maria Theresa and Holy Roman Emperor Francis I, Marie was betrothed to the heir to the French throne while still a child. The couple wed in 1770 when she was just 14 and Louis just 15.


The newlyweds both knew that Marie’s primary duty as a wife was to produce a male heir. But the marriage went unconsummated for several years, due to either a physical issue on Louis’ part or a psychological one. Royal courts were notoriously gossipy, none more-so than intrigue-filled Versailles, and Marie and Louis were harangued with advice and criticism about their supposed biological “failure” — with Marie’s brother dispatched to give the young king some step-by-step sexual advice.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment