In the Firm 2(The movie), Click here.

 In the Firm 2(The movie), Click here.  The old man is the Principal of the firm that hires 12 juniors a year.  However, in this batch we see the son of the American Psycho taking the work very seriously ( reciting the duty of care, breach of the Duty and the harm suffered by the breach with their being a line of established categorised cases or sufficient proximity between victim and tort feasor to say a duty of care exists  ).  Bur, he takes competition very seriously also.  We dont know if he really graduated but it looks like it on paper and he bought a Porsche Design automatic watch very early; not a Rolex.  So, he feels like he fits.  However, when other people answer questions in the  board room too much, he gets very  angry; if is in the board room so then he decides to befriend them around the group and then follow the star boy or star girl  home on their drive  but in an unmarked cruiser.  He pulls them over eventually with a siren and then tells them before executing the other junior that that should not answer soo many questions in the board room so that maybe others can have a chance ( give us a chance...nuh? Szzszse....kiss my teeth)...then you hear the other junior say, "Hey, aren't you Joseph Marley...the Junior from Purdue?" and then the Psycho pulls the trigger....BANG!!!??  There is about  70% of the firm's juniors missing in 2 years just because of this one   Psycho named Veroni Arthur who does not want anyone to have anything in front of him.  But, eventually he is killed by am under cover officer pretending to be a junior and who has joined the firm under cover to investigate the murder.  Two founding members were missing also.  









  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment