If you have a Super American phone and you have tenants that you have not been servicing with the usual 12 months of rent but maybe only 11 months, why would that be? You have to pay the water bill on those units 12 months a year. The phone is a king phone but it causes a "Theoden" syndrome. Click here.

If you have a Super American phone and you have tenants that you have not been servicing with the usual 12 months of rent but maybe only 11 months, why would that be? You have to pay the water bill on those units  12 months a year.   The phone is a king phone but it causes a "Theoden" syndrome.     

What if the rent is supposed to be $12,000.00 per year per unit at $1,000.00 per month. On ten units, you are expecting $120,000.00.    But, if you only collect 11 months and not 12 months on the rent, then you will be down by $1000.00 per unit per month and $10,000.00 per year at only $110,000.00 and not the whole $120,000.00.  If it is a shortfall over two years, then we are missing $20,000.00 with our rent at $220,000.00 and not $240,000.00 We need to make up for this difference of $20,000.00.  

So, we will add an additional $166.67 per month of we intend to make up for the shortfall in 12 months.  The difference is $20,000.00.  We divide that by 10 to see what the debt is as spread out over the 10 units and we get $2000.00.  We divide that by 12  and we get $166.67 per unit  every month. This equals $1666.70 for all ten units.   We multiply that by 12 and we get our $20,000. To achieve this recouping of the $20,000.00 in deficient unpaid rent over a 12 month period, we add $166.67 per month to rent for each unit. The rent is now $1166.67 per month.  If you want to take two years to make up the $20,000.00 deficit, we would divide $166.67 in two and get $83.33. $83.33 X 10 units=$833.30 per month x 24 months = $20,000.00.   

   

 by Fleet Street Journal. 








 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment