The question is can we trust human life and safety to total unsupervised driverless automation when the system is soo old? The trains must be supervised with a driver or security officer trained as a driver in the cab who can activate emergency stop functions faster than a computer if they see a fox on the track. Today. London Tube strike: TfL ‘told to embrace driverless trains for long-term funding deal. ClIck here.

 

London Tube strike: TfL ‘told to embrace driverless trains for long-term funding deal’

Driverless tube trains are fiercely resisted by unions who have called it ‘dangerous’ and ‘nonsensical’

 
By 
T

fL has been told it must embrace driverless trains as a condition for its long-term funding, according to reports.

The requirement is part of a move to lessen the effectiveness of the RMT which on Thursday called a second strike in a week in a row over job losses and pensions.

It has sparked travel chaos across London, causing most lines on the Underground to be suspended, with commuters facing long waits for buses and taxis to get to work.

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps has reportedly insisted on driverless tech as a condition for a long-term settlement with TfL, according to the Daily Mail citing a Government source.

“Industrial action or no industrial action, there is a strategic case for moving forward on driverless trains,” a source told the paper.

“They are already a reality – the London Docklands Light Railway has been automated since its birth 35 years ago – but there is a deep-seated cultural resistance to the concept at TfL.

“It cannot be right that commuters are held to ransom and the economy of London harmed, merely at the whim of union bosses.”

Boris Johnson has repeatedly pushed for driverless trains.

He said during funding negotiations with TfL in 2020: “Let’s not be the prisoners of the unions any more, let’s go to driverless trains and let’s make that a condition of the funding settlement for Transport for London this autumn.”

However, unions have strongly resisted the idea.

PA

ASLEF, the train drivers’ union, previously branded the idea as a “nonsensical distraction for a rudderless government”.

RMT, the union which called Tuesday’s and Thursday’s strikes of London Underground staff, has also previously slammed the idea as “dangerous nonsense” that should be “consigned to the science fiction shelf”.

Sadiq Khan has responsibility for TfL but has been ordered by the Government to reduce the costs of staff pensions in return for a £200m bailout to run until June 24.

He has called for the Government to provide a longer-term deal to avoid significant and damaging cuts to Tube and bus services”.

ADVERTISING

A spokesperson for the Mayor said driverless trains were “not a priority for TfL” amid an estimated £10bn price tag, reported the paper.

 
Unmute

Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?