If social, human and self acceptance was a maze game, how long would it take in your life to navigate the maze? Life is self acceptance and when you make mistakes, it is about self forgiveness, so that you resume quiet and stability in self acceptance. Would you be like the foolish woman relying on a husband for that essential self acceptance because it is good to have a husband or a wife but you should not rely on them for acceptance. In all your getting, get understanding; Proverbs 4:7. In getting to the answer be careful how people who are anthropologically incompatible for family while friendship might be okay. The incompatibility may mean she will defeat herself when it comes to a standard average family life as it may be that her most immediate great female ancestor lived in a subterranean dwelling or cave just north of the city where they have a conservation area now and the dwelling was cemented or they built a shopping mall on top of it. So, why argue with her? After you do not fail her and the expectations of a reasonable family man, she will break up or she will follow any deceit involving an offer of more money. Commit to what is best for you if she is just a baby mother and a very nice friend also but if she is just capable of nothing other than raising children, that's okay. Identify and separate. You don't want the baby mother experience for your entire life. You want a household. Let her go. You can see she is off and is determined to recite her baby mother ancestry vehemently instead of celebrate family as if you are trying to assimilate her. She is just a nice girl but not a mother in a family. She will prove is wrong some day. Look; here is Ivan now with a ring. But, she seems to argue with the fact that Ivan as the right one as if she is fighting God's law. I have never been with anyone like that who prefers the family ethics of the yard vs. the more traditional family unit and then of you do, you feel like garbage in Brooklyn. Every Deacon could be your father but when one of them pulls your pants off who is, in fact, your father, then you don't feel covered. Then the pastor now has to be your spiritual cover to help you function. Click here.

*Birth

It
YOU.

                                                                                             *Self acceptance



 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment