Two contemporary Porsches answer the question, do we need sports cars? Click here.

 https://www.wallpaper.com/transport

TRANSPORT

Two contemporary Porsches answer the question, do we need sports cars?

Porsche 911 Carrera 4S

      
  •  

Browse around the Porsche website and you quickly get straight to the heart of a contemporary dilemma; do we actually need sports cars? The fabled manufacturer made its name as a supplier of purist machinery and nothing else, obsessively honing a relatively small family of products in search of the Platonic ideal of what a sports car should be. You can still buy their descendants, of course, but the contemporary 718 and 911 models are dwarfed in sales terms by their stablemates, the Cayenne and Macan SUVs and the Panamera sports saloon, as well as the first all-electric Porsche, the Taycan saloon. It’s fair to say that sports cars are now a niche business for Porsche, even if high performance is not; over the past 18 years, the company has built a million Cayennes. In contrast, it took Porsche well over half a century to build a million 911s.

For the sake of argument, we’re comparing Porsche’s Macan S with the 911 Carrera 4S, two ostensibly very different cars. For a start, the two-door 911 costs around twice as much as the more practical Macan SUV. It also dramatically out-performs it, although short of a racetrack, autobahn or fiendishly twisty country road with far-reaching sightlines, there are very few places you can definitively demonstrate this. Enthusiasts would counter that vulgar displays of power are not what a sports car is about; the passion is to be found in the purity of the relationship between driver and machine.

Front aspect view of Porsche 911 Carrera 4S
Porsche 911 Carrera 4S

The current Macan and all-new 911 (the eighth generation of the model) share an ethos but stand poles apart in this unspoken hierarchy; both are status symbols but the 911 brings with it the full weight of brand history, as well as an unspoken implication of driver skill discernment and involvement. In contrast, the Macan could be seen as the result of brazen populism and market research. It’s also born out of Porsche’s many years of experimentation with SUV and Crossover forms. Last Autumn, a monograph about the company’s design studio opened up the Porsche vaults and revealed a clutch of concept cars that had never before seen the light of day. Despite the company’s diverse contemporary line-up, these unseen Porsches showed a far more experimental side to the brand as well as the transitional designs that flesh out the family tree. These included the 2013 Porsche Macan Vision Safari, a 3-door high-riding sports crossover that is the missing link between the dedicated 911 and 959 rally cars of the 1980s and 90s and today’s more conventional SUVs.

Porsche Macan Vision Safari
Porsche Macan Vision Safari

Both these cars are brilliant to drive, but for different reasons. The mid-range Macan is broadly competent without being dynamically exceptional or hysterically over-powered, whereas the newest 911 is a fitting evolution of the legendary model, cramming all the latest tech into a car that’s slightly larger, more luxurious and complex than its predecessor. You get more space and function in the 5-seater Macan, although it’s only marginally longer than the low-lying 2+2 911. The far more powerful 911 has a rear-mounted 6-cylinder engine versus the Macan’s V6 and both have variable four-wheel drive. The 911 lives up to its reputation of being the most practical of all supercars, but neither make much sense in a city, let alone a suburb. Visually, they’re good examples of Porsche’s tasteful but undemanding family design language. However, this means they also benefit from the company’s current reigning expertise at interior design.

One thing is also conspicuously missing from both: electrification. Here’s where Porsche’s past will have to collide with the inevitable future. It’s rumoured that the next-gen Macan will be all-electric, leaving this current model as a legacy product for those unable to make the leap. But an electric 911? Many Porsche fanatics have been reassured by the triumphant introduction of the 2020 Taycan, but whether this tech can be translated into the smaller, lighter, and purer ethos of the 911 remains to be seen. §

Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?