FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Governor, attorney general feuding over coronavirus actions By BRUCE SCHREINER July 16, 2020

Click to copy
RELATED TOPICS

Governor, attorney general feuding over coronavirus actions

By BRUCE SCHREINER July 16, 2020
FILE - In this Dec. 17, 2019, file photo, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, left, talks about the role of attorney general in Frankfort, Ky., shortly before Daniel Cameron, right, is sworn in as Kentucky's attorney general. Partisan bickering is nothing new in Kentucky, but tensions are ratcheting up as coronavirus cases continue to rise. Beshear, a Democrat, is fending off legal challenges from Cameron, a Republican, over his executive actions during the pandemic. (AP Photo/Bruce Schreiner, File)

FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Partisan bickering is nothing new in Kentucky, but tensions between the governor and attorney general are ratcheting up as a recent spike in coronavirus cases continues.

This time it’s a Democratic governor, Andy Beshear, fending off legal challenges from the Republican attorney general, Daniel Cameron, who is lobbing phrases like “totalitarian” against some of Beshear’s rules during the pandemic. Beshear, who spent the previous four years as Kentucky’s attorney general mounting legal challenges to executive actions by a Republican governor, counters that Cameron is trying to tie his hands in a fight to save lives.

Ultimately, the courts will decide how far the governor can go in restricting the behavior of Kentuckians, including whether they have to wear masks in public.

Cameron this week asked a judge to block virus-related executive actions by the governor. He filed a strongly worded motion accusing Beshear of responding to the pandemic with “unchecked, totalitarian use of emergency authority” in violation of the state’s Constitution.

Cameron’s sweeping motion also seeks an order preventing Beshear from issuing additional restrictions under the current COVID-19 state of emergency.

On Thursday, Beshear denounced the attorney general’s latest legal maneuver as “just plain irresponsible” and declared: “Don’t play politics with the lives of people.”

Earlier, Beshear laid out what’s at stake in the legal fight, saying in a social media post: “With no rules, there is no chance of getting kids back to school, we will lose over $10 billion in our economy and many Kentuckians will die. I hope everyone understands how scary and reckless this is.”

Cameron retorted with a tweet of his own: “The Constitution is not political, & it must be followed even in a pandemic.”

In sizing up the bickering, longtime Kentucky political commentator Al Cross said: “It’s almost a declaration of war by the attorney general against the governor.”

Republicans have a “legitimate complaint” that they haven’t been consulted in the rule making, he said, but added: “It does seem strange that he (Cameron) would do this at a time when the case rate has increased by half and we’re on a discouraging upward trend line.”

On Tuesday, Beshear reported 576 confirmed coronavirus cases statewide, the second-highest daily total since the pandemic began. The only higher one-day count came in the spring when an outbreak at a prison inflated the statewide number of cases. The state reported 413 more confirmed cases Thursday, raising the total to at least 21,083 since the pandemic began. The total virus-related death count in Kentucky was 650.

Beshear, who took office in December, has taken an aggressive approach to fighting the pandemic. During the onset of the health threat, he issued a series of orders shutting down much of the state’s economy. He has since eased those restrictions in restarting commerce.

 

Cameron’s new motion is only the latest legal volley in a battle against the governor’s virus-related actions.

Cameron has asked another judge to rule on whether Beshear’s order requiring most Kentuckians to wear masks in public complied with state law. Cameron has said his request was not about the appropriateness of wearing masks, saying recently he sees them as an “important tool” in fighting the pandemic. And Cameron has joined in criticizing orders restricting crowd sizes at Florence Speedway and at agritourism sites as well as class sizes at day care centers.

In his latest court filing, the attorney general said the governor’s orders placed an “arbitrary and unreasonable burden” on people. He asked for a ruling blocking Beshear from issuing or enforcing any order under Kentucky’s state of emergency law.

He said the governor has “given little public explanation” for his actions.

“The governor’s claim of discretion to decide whether to enforce his executive orders or not, at his whim, with no public notice, guidelines, or explanation for how and when his orders may be enforced, is an exercise of arbitrary power” in violation of the state’s Constitution, the motion said.

During a radio interview Thursday, Beshear said his actions are similar to what other governors have done, adding: “But I’ve got the only AG in the country that’s suing over them.”

“We in Kentucky and in America are at war with COVID-19 and the attorney general wants to come collect all of our ammunition and say, ‘Good luck with the enemy,’” Beshear said during the Kentucky Sports Radio show.

Less than a year ago, Beshear was on the opposite end of such fights. The feud is reminiscent of the courtroom battles Beshear had with his predecessor, former Republican Gov. Matt Bevin. As attorney general, Beshear filed a series of lawsuits suits challenging executive actions by Bevin, including the replacement of members of state boards and commissions. Beshear defeated Bevin in last year’s election.

___

Follow AP coverage of the pandemic at https://apnews.com/VirusOutbreak and https://apnews.com/UnderstandingtheOutbreak.

Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?