A new executive order is being handed down to honor the immutable law and to clarify the procedure and standards of evidence. Like Bill Cosby, the President will have the benefit of the double jeopardy principle and cannot be tried twice for the same allegations. The procedure involving impeachment must respect the U.S. Constitution involving any proceedings concerning criminal allegations. A misdemeanor Court procedure will do. The procedure involving impeachment must also respect Article 10 and Article 11 of the UDHR with its import via the U.S. Constitution as noted under Article Six of that Constitution. Click here for more.

Did Ramesses say that after graduation, you are now going through IBM, MI6 or something else very similar and that you need to just follow the emotion after two cups of Star Designer coffee and that the way to get in is to show your authority by robbing the bank? They really want you dead or to at least understand as they bring you down to their level, killing you softly, that you must see the world in the color of authority since what is the point of democracy if an idiot could be put in office by the ?????  who will debate the requisite life saving UN water purification and filtration policies; debating the universal minimum income support also?  You expect to spend money on people for war. What about spending money on people for peace?  Is it not better to have a bird in hand than one up in the air?  Usually, you are given the evidence as a file, brief or disclosure.  It is the summary of  the information of what is alleged to substantiate the allegations.   It is provided soon as possible after being advised of your misdemeanor.  A new executive order is being  handed down to honor an immutable law and to clarify the procedure and standards of evidence.    Like Bill Cosby, the President will have the benefit of the double jeopardy principle and cannot be tried twice for the same allegations.  The procedure involving impeachment must respect the U.S. Constitution involving any proceedings concerning criminal allegations. A misdemeanor Court procedure will do.   The procedure involving impeachment must also respect Article 10 and Article 11 of the UDHR with its import via the U.S. Constitution as noted under Article Six of that Constitution.     The key issue in the Donald Impeachment case is intention. This refers to the intention behind contacting the Ukraines to clarify information he had already received from Ukrainian police involving suspicious activity involving the Biddens. It had nothing to do with attacking political rivals. Arresting a drug dealer for possession of narcotics even though the dealer is a registered Democrat aspiring to be a candidate is not an abuse of power.   Arresting a money launderer who hopes to launder through the Ukraine, is not an attack on a rival even if he is a candidate.   It is doing your job.  His job description as President sets out what authority he can exercise in the carriage of his duties and this involves using any means necessary to defend the nation's security and investigate all activity concerning the same as Bidden is not a current representative of the state.    If he was a UN ambassador on a UN mission in the Ukraine, then it would have satisfied protocol for former government employees.  His unilateral trip to the Ukraine did not satisfy several protocols as to the requirement to specify the  declared purpose of the trip which would be a criminal matter the Bidden's would have to answer in Court. You suffered a glitch in judgement. That's ok.  Your political aspirations are not greater than the constitution.  You will be dealt with.  The nation owes Donald an apology.  Truthfully,  no offence has been committed as there is no ultra virus  or unlawful act being committed by the President.   His intention fits squarely within the Presidential mandate and job description set out in the Presidential Guide Book written by the U.S. Government in 1789. In other words, there is no case to answer.  The impeachment charge must be withdrawn.  The Ukraine did not get any from Bidden.   There is no point swearing oaths during a trial when there is no offence.  But if you do, the evidence of both sides is not in opposition.  See www.angelronangreenfieldurban.blogspot.ca.