The key issue in the Donald Impeachment case is intention. This refers to the intention behind contacting the Ukraines to clarify information he had already received from Ukrainian police involving suspicious activity involving the Biddens. It had nothing to do with attacking political rivals. In any event, what is a political rival? As a former Vice President who swore an oath, Bidden is not a rival. Is Bidden's stated intent to "rival" the President? Arresting a drug dealer for possession of narcotics even though the dealer is a registered Democrat aspiring to be a candidate is not an abuse of power. Arresting a money launderer who hopes to launder through the Ukraine, is not an attack on a rival even if he is a candidate. It is doing your job. His job description as President sets out what authority he can exercise in the carriage of his duties and this involves using any means necessary to defend the nation's security and investigate all activity concerning the same as Bidden is not a current representative of the state. If he was a UN ambassadors on a UN mission in the Ukraine, then it would have satisfied protocol for former government employees. Mango girl His unilateral trip to the Ukraine did not satisfy several protocols as to the requirement to specify the declared purpose of the trip and the failure to clarify could be a criminal matter the Bidden's would have to answer in Court. If Obalma or Justice O ' Conner went to China and started making deals with Chinese leaders, the President could certainly make telephone inquiries with the Ukraines to find out if O'Connor is trying to...trying to...usurp his position and authority as President. Who defines himself as a rival of the President when he is not even a candidate? The nation owes Donald an apology. Truthfully, no offence has been committed as there is no ultra virus or unlawful act being committed by the President. His intention fits squarely within the Presidential mandate and job description set out in the Presidential Guide Book written by the U.S. Government in 1789. In other words, there is no case to answer. The impeachment charge must be withdrawn. The Ukraine did not get any from Bidden. There is no point swearing oaths during a trial when there is no offence. But if you do, the evidence of both sides is not in opposition. Secondly, the allegations involving obstruction of Congress cannot stand. When was he sent an order to comply or a caution involving contempt?

The key issue in the Donald Impeachment case is intention. This refers to the intention behind contacting the Ukraines to clarify information he had already received from Ukrainian police involving suspicious activity involving the Biddens. It had nothing to do with attacking political rivals. In any event, what is a political rival?   As a former Vice President who swore an oath, Bidden is not a rival. Is Bidden's stated intent to "rival" the President?   Arresting a drug dealer for possession of narcotics even though the dealer is a registered Democrat aspiring to be a candidate is not an abuse of power.  Arresting a money launderer who hopes to launder through the Ukraine, is not an attack on a rival even if he is a candidate.   It is doing your job.  His job description as President sets out what authority he can exercise in the carriage of his duties and this involves using any means necessary to defend the nation's security and investigate all activity concerning the same as Bidden is not a current representative of the state.    If he was a UN ambassadors on a UN mission in the Ukraine, then it would have satisfied protocol for former government employees. Mango girl  His unilateral trip to the Ukraine did not satisfy several protocols as to the requirement to specify the  declared purpose of the trip and the failure to clarify could be a criminal matter the Bidden's would have to answer in Court. If Obalma or Justice O ' Conner went to China and started making deals with Chinese leaders, the President could certainly make telephone inquiries with the Ukraines to find out if O'Connor is trying to...trying to...usurp his position and authority as President. Who defines himself as a rival of the President when he is not even a candidate? 
The nation owes Donald an apology.  Truthfully,  no offence has been committed as there is no ultra virus  or unlawful act being committed by the President.   His intention fits squarely within the Presidential mandate and job description set out in the Presidential Guide Book written by the U.S. Government in 1789. In other words, there is no case to answer.  The impeachment charge must be withdrawn.  The Ukraine did not get any from Bidden.   There is no point swearing oaths during a trial when there is no offence.  But if you do, the evidence of both sides is not in opposition.

Secondly,  the allegations involving obstruction of Congress cannot stand. When was he sent an order to comply or a caution involving contempt?