Bidden to hurt America; Looking at Bidden and Donald's resistance of a universal minimum income support, these men may be related to Americans who resisted a coast to coast high way and rail service. These services in the 18th, 19th and 20th century were indicative of the new national life, national experience, expectations and the existing economy. The minimum income support is for every citizen even if they own 10 buildings. The democrats have enough power in the senate to implement it now. Donald has not implemented it and nor have they. If they did, there would be no doubt about their intentions and willingness to help America. They could still seek Donald's impeachment. It would help their agenda. But, with the power they have, they are only focussed on putting Pense in the Oval Office and not helping Americans. Even if Donald is impeached, he does not have to leave since he signed an Executive order like Clinton to say he will not have to resign and Americans whose jobs were automated an hour ago, will be left to rob the bank if they live in the wrong states, states without a universal minimum income support or guaranteed support EBT Card program. Obalma and others who understand this program and who saw a Republican Secretary of State write the UN ILO Recommendations R202 really probably are law graduates and not paid actors according to rumours. If he is not a paid actor, then he is a cop who knows that anyone who resists the program for national minimum income support is going down, going down for tacitly, by deeds and words, creating conditions of life that amounts to an American genocide affecting all Americans. I thought all paid national politicians were cops obligated to promote the law that is already policy. See the UN ILO Recommendations R202. See US Code 18 Chapter 50. Ask the former Democratic Secretary of State John and Kerry.

Bidden to hurt America; Looking at Bidden and Donald's resistance of a universal minimum income support, these men may be related to Americans who resisted a coast to coast high way and rail service. These services in the 18th, 19th and 20th century were indicative of the new national life, national experience, expectations and the existing  economy. The minimum income support is for every citizen even if they own 10 buildings. The democrats have enough power in the senate to implement it now. Donald has not implemented it and nor have they. If they did, there would be no doubt about their intentions and willingness to help America. They could still seek Donald's impeachment. It would help their agenda. But, with the power they have, they are only focussed on putting Pense in the Oval Office and not helping Americans. Even if Donald is impeached, he does not have to leave since he signed an Executive order like Clinton to say he will not have to resign and Americans whose jobs were automated an hour ago, will be left to rob the bank if they live in the wrong states, states without a universal minimum income support or guaranteed support EBT Card program.   Obalma and others who understand this program and who saw a Republican  Secretary of State  write the UN ILO Recommendations R202 really probably are law graduates and not paid actors according to rumours.  If he is not a paid actor, then he is a cop who knows that anyone who resists the program for national minimum income support is going down, going down for tacitly, by deeds and words, creating conditions of life that amounts to an American  genocide affecting all Americans.    I thought all paid national politicians were cops obligated to promote the law that is already policy.  See the UN ILO Recommendations R202.      See US Code 18 Chapter 50.   Ask the former Democratic Secretary of State John and Kerry.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment