A man is accused of threatening a gas station attendant. He never did. There is no video evidence. There is no confession. It is oath v. Oath and there is no confession. Can he be found guilty? The answer is no. If it is oath v. Oath, there is no evidence and it is not good enough.

A man is accused of threatening a gas station attendant.  He never did. There is no video evidence. There is no confession.  It is oath v. Oath and there is no confession. Can he be found guilty? The answer is no.  If it is oath v. Oath, there is no evidence and it is not good enough.