Captured, Killed.....????.... It is always a consumer's legal right to advise a business when they business is breaking the law and help them understand it; that you are hurting the customer or intimidating the customer by not responding to customer correspondence. Insurance is involved and the actual problem that involves threatening the customer and a failure to provide services or over billing on storage locker invoices that amounts to Fraud by $23.00. That is fraud under. You could say to the business "...you are damaging my vehicle..its criminal damage under $5000.00, a summary election offence, and you are breaking the law or you preventing my entry into my rented lockers at the gym( or the storage yard) and breaking the law." There is no other or improper action contrary to the criminal code of Canada when you are just sheltering yourself from the cold in your own car seat with your feet outside of the vehicle on the ground and nor is there any improper action by advising a business, as a customer, when they have broken the law.

  It is always a consumer's legal right to advise a business when they business is  breaking the law and help them understand it; that you are hurting the customer or intimidating the customer by not responding to customer correspondence.  

Insurance is involved and the actual problem that involves threatening the customer and a failure to provide services or over billing on storage locker invoices that amounts to Fraud by $23.00. That is fraud under.    

 

 You could say to the business "...you are damaging my vehicle..its criminal damage under $5000.00, a summary election offence, and  you are breaking the law or you preventing my entry into my rented lockers at the gym( or the storage yard) and breaking the law."   There is no other or improper action contrary to the criminal code of Canada when you are just sheltering yourself from the cold  in your own car seat with your feet outside of the vehicle on the ground and nor is there any improper action by  advising a business, as a customer,  when they have broken the law.  







Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?