Maybe TV commercials are not the best place to suggest alternative family formats. The work of an advertiser is difficult but the risk of collateral litigious causalities is significant. The audiences are now global whether or not you are entirely aware of this. The TV shows have global audiences also and who wants to hear about a woman's vagina looking like roast beef servings after lots of coitus with.....her husband? It's not the forum for these discussions and nor is the television and movie genre. These genres are intent on being money making ventures and they are fragile as such. The audiences are fragile and you can't follow the voices that say they do not care about the diversity of the audiences especially with television commercials. The key issue with these commercials is that there is no content warning for all families and children who would prefer to have their families devoid of these intrusive television commercials with their alternative family suggestions in lottery ads and make up company ads. With the lack of a proper formal warning, many laws are broken with the airing of these commercials with successful claims in the Law Courts and the Human Rights Tribunals.

 Maybe TV commercials are not the best place to suggest alternative family formats.  The work of an  advertiser is difficult but the risk of  collateral litigious causalities is significant.  The audiences are now global whether or not you are entirely aware of this.  The TV shows have global audiences also and who wants to hear about a woman's vagina looking like roast beef servings after lots of coitus with.....her husband?   

It's not the forum for these discussions and nor is the television and movie genre. These genres are intent on being money making ventures and they are fragile as such.  The audiences are fragile and you can't follow the voices that say they do not care about the diversity of the audiences especially with television commercials. The key issue with these commercials is that there is no content warning for all families and children who would prefer to have their families devoid of these intrusive television commercials with their alternative family suggestions in lottery ads and make up company ads. 

With the lack of a proper formal warning, many laws are broken with the airing of these commercials with successful claims in the Law Courts and the Human Rights Tribunals.  



















 


 







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?

Post a Comment