Angel Ronan ™. You were invited to a party at a house to assist as a Cook but you did not know the Head Cook was trespassing. The police arrive and arrested everyone. But you had no idea that the host named Donuts Arthur was already under a criminal restraining order following a conviction of trespass and fraud to be away from the premises for all time immemorial. It was government housing and he and others tried to sell the property or take investments and others monies from people. As a cook, you were charged with criminal trespass but you are just a cook. What do you know about all of these things? You make good Pork Belly and fish and chips. You have a defence in law and should not be told you should plead guilty. You should not plead unless you are advised of your rights to trial. I know unless you are told the plea must be voluntary and that you have a right to trial. The pleas must be struck unless you are advised accordingly. You were invited to cook at a part so you are not guilty. To be guilty, you would have to know you are trespassing. if you did plea, you should advise the Court that you were not advised of your rights to trial pursuant to your credible Defence. The plea will be struck and you can set a trial date and attempt to resolve it with the Crown based on your evidence. You might have to swear an affidavit, confirming your version of the events.

    Angel Ronan ™.   You were invited to a party at a house to assist as a Cook but you did not know the Head Cook was trespassing.  The police  arrive and arrested everyone.   But you had no idea that the host named  Donuts Arthur was already under a criminal restraining order following a conviction of trespass and fraud  to be away from the premises for all time immemorial.  It was government housing and he and others  tried to sell the property or take investments and others  monies from people.     As a cook, you were charged with criminal trespass but you are just a cook. What do you know about all of these things?   You make good Pork Belly and fish and chips.  You have a defence in law and should not be told  you  should plead guilty. You should not plead unless you are advised of your rights to trial.    I know unless you are told the plea must be voluntary and that you have a right to trial.  The pleas must be struck unless you are advised accordingly. You were invited to cook at a part so you are not guilty.  To be guilty, you would have to know you are trespassing.  if you did plea, you should advise the Court that you were not advised of your rights to trial pursuant to  your credible Defence.  The plea will be struck and you can set a trial date and attempt to resolve it with the Crown based on your evidence.  You might have to swear an affidavit, confirming your version of the events. 





Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?