There is an offence called deception or uttering false statements when someone impersonates another by submitting another individual's resume as their own. You could say it's a conspiracy to commit murder. That is crazy. But, it would also be wrong, rather illegal and crazy to hire the person if you did not caution them and just tell them to leave and come back in ten minutes with their own details on a paper serviette or a bag from All Bar One or McDonald's or something. The issue is that even if a manager hired someone submitting the false resume, it is an offence for the owners also. The owner is liable under vicarious criminal liability. What is consistent with a reputable establishment? Who are these people? They hired someone who showed up with Ibrahimovitch on his resume. But, he does not know him. He lied and you have him in your office, suckling on your seat and then you are dead. What are these drugs in your building? You have l to go now with the authorities. The dishwasher with pink nails is the manager now and the manager who hired him becomes the head boss and where are you? They are hiring a new cuisine since they say you had a fire. You see the pattern. The current manager is the estuary captain of the man with the pink nails who wears lipstick; like the Joker. He talks about guns quite a lot. You see the pattern. Everyone goes to court and then jail. Thank you for reading this Brief from ANGEL RONAN ENTWERFEN ™.

 There is an offence called deception or uttering false statements when someone impersonates another by submitting another individual's resume as their own.  You could say it's a conspiracy to commit murder.  That is crazy.   But, it would also be wrong, rather illegal and crazy to hire the person if you did not caution them and just tell them to leave and come back in ten minutes with their own details on a paper serviette or a bag from All Bar One or McDonald's or something.  


The issue is that even if a manager hired someone submitting the false resume, it is an offence for the owners also.   The owner is liable under vicarious criminal liability. What is consistent with a reputable establishment?  Who are these people? They hired someone who showed up with  Ibrahimovitch on his resume.   But, he does not know him. 

He lied and you have him in your office, suckling on your seat and then you are dead. What are these drugs in your building?  You have l to go now with the authorities.  The dishwasher with pink nails  is the manager now and the manager who hired him becomes the head boss and where are you? They are hiring a new cuisine since they say you had a fire. You see the pattern.  The current manager is the  estuary captain of the man with the pink nails who wears lipstick; like the Joker.  He talks about guns quite a lot.  You see the pattern.  

Everyone goes to court and then jail.  


Thank you for reading this Brief from ANGEL RONAN ENTWERFEN ™.











 

Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?