If you were running a restaurant, what type of family would you need? Maybe when things are tight in the early days, they would be willing to support you and just be be family. Let you stay on the Couch Maybe for as long as it might take. Maybe they will take on a job title and help the growth in the shared family opportunity. Then there are those who will only try to kill you, register your business name and take it for themselves and only ask what happens if he is dead? If he was dead, who says there is any by business left that you could just walk in and own it, take it? Where would you go to get the name transferred to you? Wouldn't it have to be registered to you partially before he is dead for you to own it and participate and if you had to argue and make a claim with the government to own it, wouldn't you have to be working in the company? Otherwise, asking what happens if he is dead and stealing his bag and starving him of oxygen in the attempt is a conspiracy to murder as you ask what happens to the company if he is dead. You are actually working to see what would happen. You can go to jail. Why don't you do what white people would do and help your family if you could. Help your family. Be white. In the alternative, do it for BLM; Black Life Matters.

 If you were running a restaurant, what type of family would you need?  Maybe when things are tight in the early days, they would be willing to support you and just be be family.  Let you stay on the Couch Maybe for as long as it might take. Maybe they will take on a job title and help the growth in the shared family opportunity.  

Then there are those who will only try to kill you, register your business name and take it for themselves and only ask what happens if he is dead?  If he was dead, who says there is any by business left that you could just walk in and own it, take it? Where would you go to get the name transferred to you? Wouldn't it have to be registered to you partially before he is dead for you to own it and participate and if you had to argue and make a claim with the government to own it, wouldn't you have to be working in the company? Otherwise, asking what happens if he is dead and stealing his bag and starving him of oxygen in the attempt is a conspiracy to murder as you ask what happens to the company if he is dead. You are actually working to see what would happen. You can go to jail.   

Why don't you do what white people would do and help your family if you could.    Help your family. Be white. In the alternative, do it for BLM; Black Life Matters.   



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment