The low interest was to attract business. But, you dont have enough people with the ability to pay etc. It is due to automation. Some economies have lots of people who have ability to pay regardless of what automation is taking place. They have a universal minimum income support and the Mustang drivers in Webster's Grove in the current era have turbans on as newly arrived students and visa residents with a universal minimum income support from Pakistan. It is just that a low interest rate is good for some people; very bad for others. Asian populations with ability to pay and ability to buy don't really mind but you took back the factory in Ohio that Obalma gave us at 0 % so how can we trust our zero interest purchases of empty buildings will be safe any longer? Look to yourselves Judasmerica. You fail to respect the principles in the UN ILO Recommendations R202 that will respect your economy's independent regenerative potential. You have people of your own. It will help your people. Why do you want our people to come and live in America? What is your intention? So, now what we do is sing a folk song maybe. I don't know. But, you cannot expect that you can have Asian people do everything in America as you hold the American nation hostage maybe. I don't know.

 The low interest was to attract business. But, you dont have enough people with the ability to pay etc. It is due to automation. Some economies have lots of people who have ability to pay regardless of what automation is taking place. They have a universal minimum income support and the Mustang drivers in Webster's Grove in the current era   have turbans on as newly arrived students and visa residents  with a universal minimum income support from Pakistan.  It is just that a low interest rate is good for some people; very bad for others. Asian populations with ability to pay and ability to buy don't really mind but you took back the factory in Ohio that Obalma gave us  at 0 % so how can we trust our zero interest purchases of empty buildings will be safe any longer?    Look to yourselves Judasmerica. You fail to respect the principles in the UN ILO  Recommendations R202 that will respect your economy's independent regenerative potential. You have people of your own. It will help your people. Why do you want our people to come and live in America? What is your intention?    So, now what we do is sing a folk song maybe. I don't know. But, you cannot expect that you can have Asian people do everything in America as you hold the American nation hostage maybe. I don't know. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment