Ontario is a region with tremendous size and value that exceeds the territorial size of France. As such, it presents a tremendous opportunity for the honor and expansion of French culture with the European French commitment to Social Solidarity minimum income support for all citizens of Ontario and maybe also Canada generally. This is seen in the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement. Domo Arigato for the last 40 years. Bye. Maybe sell some French branded vehicles more often. I'm going back to Japan; too cold there in Canada and most importantly there is not enough socioeconomic commitment and therefore not enough money per citizen so that it can't really make any sense. What have to understand is that the map is not the territory. I have the territory and have enjoyed it for the last 40 years and took advantage of your decision to abandon your people and manufacturing all together. But, on the map it is YOUR territory. But, who can tolerate your socioeconomic vacancy? So, we took hegemony, took territory in what is evidently officially your territory. So, will the map be the territory now that you understand? It's almost 2020 and Simon Bolivar and Montezuma have not come yet. They don't intend to. They will not miss Belize, Chile, Jamaica, and Guyana enjoying their finest hour. It's too cold! Call the French and Dutch relatives to help you turn Winnipeg into a beautiful self-winding Helsinki and they already told you to put the universal minimum income support into the economy for every citizen. But, if it is your territory, it should be your market. But, you need people. Shouldn't it be your car and product market? Maybe you should sell more European branded tv's, mobile phones and consumer products. But, you need to give your people money. You don't need people. This is supposed to be a French, English or European market stronghold.

Ontario is a region with tremendous size and value that exceeds the territorial size of France. As such, it presents a tremendous opportunity for the honor and expansion of French culture with the European French commitment to Social Solidarity minimum income support for all citizens of Ontario and maybe also Canada generally. This is seen in the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement.    Domo  Arigato for the last 40 years. Bye. Maybe sell some French branded vehicles more often. I'm going back to Japan; too cold there in Canada and most importantly there is not enough socioeconomic commitment and therefore not enough money per citizen so that it can't really make any sense. What have to understand is that the map is not the territory.  I have the territory and have enjoyed it for the last 40 years and took advantage of your decision to abandon your people and manufacturing all together. But, on the map it is YOUR territory. But, who can tolerate your socioeconomic vacancy? So, we took hegemony, took territory in what is evidently officially your territory.  So, will the map be the territory now that you understand? It's almost 2020 and Simon Bolivar and Montezuma have not come yet. They don't intend to.  They will not miss Belize, Chile, Jamaica, and Guyana enjoying their finest hour.   It's too cold! Call the French and Dutch relatives to help you turn Winnipeg into a beautiful self-winding Helsinki and they already told you to put the universal minimum income support into the economy for every citizen. But, if it is your territory, it should be your market. But, you need people.   Shouldn't it be your car and product market? Maybe you should sell more European branded tv's, mobile phones and consumer products. But, you need to give your people money. You don't need people.  This is supposed to be a French, English or European market stronghold. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment