The US Government Funding Bill Fiasco in December 2024; You would not raise the debt ceiling since you have more revenue generally. What if the US demanded a continent wide compliance with a UN based income support policy (compliance much like Covid 19 compliance) to ensure unnecessary migration among the various North American countries does not take place; and this is to be achieved with an agreement to fund each country's respective citizens at no less than $100,000.00 per year and that costs no more than $11.42 per hour; per citizen or face significant Tariffs. Focusing on the United States alone and its concerns about more military spending, The Funding Bill would then require a 3% Federal Sales tax on all consumer spending in the United States; 1% is dedicated to the national debt; 1% is dedicated to military spending; and 1% is dedicated to ensuring all Americans in the US are paid this $100,000.00 per year income support; All Americans in the same way that all Chinese and all Russians are funded. You would not raise the debt ceiling since you have more revenue generally. The economy, with this income support for all citizens protected by NORAD, must comply with the purposes of national defense as symbolized by the F22; and cover, protect, defend the life and ensure the safety of citizens from all dangers; economic dangers, domestic and foreign. We must do this with all economic means available. If you find your heart and mind says this is impossible or arduous, then maybe you have not agreed to the existence and safety of the domestic population through all means available to us; such as an income support to be paid to all citizens in North America in what is called the NORED; the North American Economic Defense. You may be caught up in reciting a culture of economic insufficiency and pain with no purposeful end and certainly it does not agree with the purpose of the F22 as noted above. Warren A. Lyon, Economist.

 The US Government  Funding Bill Fiasco in December 2024;



You would not raise the debt ceiling since you have more revenue generally.  

What if the US demanded a continent wide compliance with a UN based income support policy (compliance much like Covid 19 compliance) to ensure unnecessary migration among the various North American countries does not take place; and this is to be achieved with an agreement to fund each country's respective citizens at no less than $100,000.00 per year and that costs no more than $11.42 per hour; per citizen or face significant Tariffs.   

Focusing on the United States alone and its concerns about more military spending, The Funding Bill would then require a 3% Federal Sales tax on all consumer spending in the United States;

1% is dedicated to the national debt;

1% is dedicated to military spending; and

1% is dedicated to ensuring all Americans in the US are paid this $100,000.00 per year income support; All Americans in the same way that all Chinese and all Russians are funded.  

You would not raise the debt ceiling since you have more revenue generally.  

The economy, with this income support for all citizens protected by NORAD, must comply with the purposes of national defense as symbolized by the F22; and cover, protect, defend the life and ensure the safety of citizens from all dangers; economic dangers, domestic and foreign. We must do this with all economic means available.    If you find your heart and mind says this is impossible or arduous, then maybe you have not agreed to the existence and safety of the domestic population through all means available to us; such as an income support to be paid to all citizens in North America in what is called the NORED; the North American Economic Defense. You may be caught up in reciting a culture of economic insufficiency and pain with no purposeful end and certainly it does not agree with the purpose of the F22 as noted above.   


Warren A. Lyon, Economist.  





Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?