January 6th, 2024. Income support for all citizens is a normal capitalist economic custom; with research from Warren A. Lyon, at Angel Ronan Toshokan™. Could you run an economy in such a way to achieve kr confirm some anthropological, ancestral or developmental identity or is it to confirm some motive? Click here.

January 6th, 2024.  

 Income support for all citizens is a normal capitalist economic custom; with research  from Warren A. Lyon, at Angel Ronan Toshokan™.  

Could you run an economy in such a way to achieve or confirm some anthropological, ancestral or developmental identity or is it to confirm some motive?  

In all normal  functioning capitalist economies, it is the custom that all citizens have an income support.  China is the most capitalist economy in the world next to Japan. They have both expanded  in their understanding of pure aggressive capitalism and have taken over  all the  English countries industrially with a simple  application  of capitalism's principles.  They first assured  strong domestic markets at home with a sufficient income support for all citizens.  They obeyed all of capitalism's discoveries in light of automation. The Anglo economies have not demonstrated these hallmarks yet. They tend to Pangea resist more then human family cooperate.  

Capitalism is a closed system with one set of rules that involve efficiency in cost, supply in production and maintaining domestic consumer market demand for goods; international market demand also as auxiliary to the primary domestic market demand. 

You can talk about free markets in Global capitalism in the sense that Domestic markets are free of trade barriers that might hinder the importation of foreign goods. But, once the goods are allowed in, do you have the robust consumers in your own  domestic market who can afford to buy them with regular consistent ability to pay? If not, you need to enable your consumers with this ability or else it's a "dead horse" economy for the foreign manufacturers in addition to your own domestic manufacturers.  What is the point if you do not ensure the efficacy of your own market and your own  people as buyers of these diverse goods?  You do not really exist any longer in all your free market  talk if you do not guarantee that your own people can provide a market for those goods sent to America from all  other countries in the world.  

When it comes to  global markets "any people with money will do.'  You sell your products anywhere you can. All participate in this miraculous formulae when observing that consumers love choice and differentiation and they can buy anywhere from anyone as they shop online.  

The dichotomy between capitalism, socialism and communism was therefore really meaninglessness.  Capitalism was supposed to be allegedly more American or English. Socialism was European and Communism was Communism.  It seems the difference between capitalism and socialism on one side  and communism on the other was  really about national Communist markets  that discouraged foreign importation of goods. This is no longer an issue if contrast as the Russian economy  sells more Nike and Calvin Klein than all of North America.  Every citizen has more money and they all have money to buy with lower rates of theft. The Americans have less money per capita with endemic problems with theft  and crime every day as predicted  on human need. In fighting US  crime, all you  would need to do is adopt the socioeconomic policy of any UN compliant nation; such as the Republic of Ireland or China; probably China since the U.S. holds a major share of U.S. debt paper and they sell more Coca Cola in China than in the U.S.  

 The difference between socialism and communism on one side and capitalism on the other was seen in  Anglo American capitalism's inefficiency in their government's expenditure of more money  than all other economies on the ills that would be caused by moneylessness in any population when we would prefer that more time is spent happily receiving and collecting money on all human consumer activities.

The cyclical nature of Americentric capitalism set on economic booms predicated on new upswings in technology as seen in a Sony Walkman or MS Word and MS Office( new fads or new Automation)  followed by the recessions when the boom has taken full effect and the work force has been laid off, causing the Anglo American joblessness and the moneylessness that fosters recession .  The difference is also seen in that there was no Russian, Asian, African or European income support for every citizen to efficiently ensure, guarantee and protect the domestic market from the recessions.  

Guaranteeing  each citizen  a simple 12 cents a minute  in the 1970's as income support would have guaranteed that the economy is stable and free of recessions all together.  The 1970's global evangelist reminds us that Jesus tells us to do simple things like put mud on our eyes to solve the problem or cast your net on the other side of render into the people to avoid the socioeconomic Dysentery and render into the government a sufficient sales tax.    2 cents a minute  in the 1920's would have been enough  to avoid all this Anglo American de facto civil war over money and depression as there was ongoing automation taking place back then also.  Our current economy requires 20 cents a minute.  1 cent a minute is $$5,000.00 24 hours per day over a 12 month period.   

Would you knowingly buy a toy ball  from a manufacturer that brands it's toys with the name "Poof"?  I would not. But, if I saw the name on the basketball after buying it for $5.00, I would burn or scratch it off.  I don't want anything confusing around me. 

"When it comes to national defense, national  sovereignty and national integrity, you cannot really say "any people with money laid on them by their ulterior, alien national government will do." So, then while Capitalism is a closed system with one set of rules globally that involve efficiency in cost, efficiency in population preservation, defence, supply in production and efficiency in the Domestic consumer market demand for goods, when it comes to national integrity in your national domestic markets "your existing  citizen population and composition of people, as constructed, with the money you benevolently lay on them will be the only cost efficient solution to Domestic market integrity,  growth  and stimulus and then you can have as many immigrants come to your economy also and they can bring their money if they want to. 

 But, what about America as a fledgling economy; fledgling only because its resistance of income support for all citizens at amounts that ensure sufficient consumer stimulus and occupation of one's own economy and urban spaces has caused negative market growth since the problem was identified in the late 1850's during history's first major upswing in the mechanization of  or automation of labor. While income support was customary in Europe for centuries as an economic principles taken from ancient Egypt and Rome seen in Prince Joseph's ration in Egypt or seen in the Romans and Jesus telling Herod to render unto the people and unto Caesar, it is more of a rediscovery for the English and the Americans whose dna is combined with North American aboriginality and prone to resist the whole system instead of just enjoying the principles that give effect to community safety, consumer stimulus, strong domestic markets and  to the life of the human without the blood and sweat in shyster-ing huckster-ing,  hunting and the gathering. In this assimilation of North America to established Economic principles that have Roman and African origin, we discover that North America was like an Africa Junior in some ways but lost in the land of nod after the continental Pangea  divide  until men from the east came to the western hemisphere; some of them black Africans and some of them were Europeans like  Hernán Cortés.  There was also Estevanico (c. 1500–1539), also known as Esteban de Dorantes and Estevanico the Moor, was the first person of African descent to explore North America. It looks like he travelled around Jamaica and Cuba and saw the aboriginals who he described as appearing like West Coast Africans; Nigerian or Ghanian.  

Estevanico (c. 1500–1539), also known as Esteban de Dorantes and Estevanico the Moor, was the first person of African descent to explore North America. Little is known about his background but contemporary accounts described him as a "negro alárabe" or "Arabic-speaking black man" native to Azemmour, Morocco. In 1522, he was sold as a slave to the Spanish nobleman Andrés Dorantes de Carranza in the Portuguese-controlled Moroccan town of Azemmour.

 Alive; After automation, how do you have a domestic market with able and willing consumers with money to buy your goods if the citizen and former worker that is now suffering joblessness does not have a job that would provide some reasonable money so, then, he can participate  in his central economic purpose as the consumer and buyer of goods; and now without money he is obsolete?   But the solution is not to, then, bring  foreigners from Asia's overflow of people or Europe's overflow of people  because there are horrible social and economic problems  that are suffered by the North American in the shameful purview of well funded non Anglo Europeans or non Anglo Asians? Reducing North American taxes is not the solution as it reduces the governments ability to respond to problems. But, the maybe the solution is a purposeful balance; a small provision of income support to every citizen at no less than $300.00 per day and also a small increase in taxes that will also help to stave off concerns about over consumption and wasteful consumption. All goals are achieved and the social and economic problems are averted; like from a well designed truck or car cabin with soo much thoughtfulness and human consideration; so crazy thoughtful....WOW and no North American is dying in front of the well funded foreigners any more who technically own the Capitol Building in every state with the loans we pay to Europe and Asia!!!!  

The only way is to give every citizen  an income support  that amounts to an economic fraction of what you save in human wages.  This fraction  of money saved can be as small as $6.00 per hour (10 cents per minute) 24 hours per day; 365 days per year to fulfill our purpose to ensure there is sufficient consumer stimulus and buying power on the market for robotically  made goods that also fulfill  their purpose 24 hours per day.  Their government spends less money on the ills that would be caused by moneylessness in any population and more  time is spent collecting money on all human consumer activities.  They lend you money when you are in debt with your "dog  chasing his tail" discussions about all the human problems caused by the moneylessness caused by job automation.  While it is obvious how to efficiently and lovingly, self defensively, "basic instinct-ually" solve it, you do not solve it but continue to spend energy embarrassing yourselves on TV just talking about the problems.   You talk about people dying and freezing and starving in your economy.  Do you pay all citizens an income support? Sze Sze!!

 But what does it really matter if the lives of your people do not matter to you?  

All the little lessons of capitalism you did not respect eventually add up.  You did not have enough consumers as real buyers with real money for too many decades.  So, your car company  is in debt to the government. The government sold it's car company debt to Asian companies.  So, they own you.  You still don't have enough consumers as real buyers with real money as you are. It respecting that all normal capitalist economies provide  an income support to all citizens that is sufficient to cover all human economic necessities on a daily basis; alive.  

 If income support is accepted as a necessary humanitarian legal requisite by virtue of the UDHR, then it is a legal requisite.   If income support is accepted as a  necessary aspect of any economy anywhere in the world post 85% Total job automation,  it is because the money is necessary to maintain the humane conditions of life.   Then a denial of income support would be imposition of  the cruel and unusual circumstances and conditions of life that would satisfy the definition of genocide. 

The denial of income support money is the denial of food, water, shelter and human safety thereby creating conditions of life that satisfy the genocide definition.  Why deny this money to any citizens under your international treaty obligations? You pay some citizens but not others based on gender or home address. Those unpaid  citizens constitute a target group under the law. Genocide is a crime under Federal US law, UK Law  and the Criminal  Code of Canada.   

Let's Wicked see how.  

Canada, the US and England are signatories to the UN Convention on the Prevention of Genocide.  

In 1948, the UN signed the “ Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”. Article II states: "Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: (a) murder of members of the group; (b) bring harm to the physical or mental integrity of members of the group; (c) intentional subjection of the group to conditions of existence calculated to bring about its total or partial physical destruction. (d) measures aimed at hindering births within the group. e) forced transfer of children from the group to another group." A group would be any set of people who  suffer collectively  the imposition of inhumane conditions of life.  

The Rutaganda Trial Chamber observed that:

"[...] the concepts of national, ethnical, racial and religious groups have been researched extensively and that, at present, there are no generally and internationally accepted precise definitions thereof. Each of these concepts must be assessed in the light of a particular political, social and cultural context. Moreover, the Chamber notes that for the purposes of applying the Genocide Convention, membership of a group is, in essence, a subjective rather than an objective concept. The victim is perceived by the perpetrator of genocide as belonging to a group slated for destruction. In some instances, the victim may perceive himself/herself as belonging to the said group."[4]

P.1. Evidence of the existence of a "national group".

In the Akayesu case, the Trial Chamber said:

"Based on the Nottebohm decision rendered by the International Court of Justice, the Chamber holds that a national group is defined as a collection of people who are perceived to share a legal bond based on common citizenship, coupled with reciprocity of rights and duties."[5]

We have designed systems of economy that can take back the money as fast as people spend it and if they spend more, they have less and give more back to the government but this is not genocide and those with bad consumption habits will not endure with us for very long while we will make money off of their unruly spending and  irresponsible spending ways.  

 They are just hamsters that spin on the global capitalist economic wheel to produce us some money on what they spend; sales tax money  or credit interest.  But, if I am the Chinese leader I must have a Chinese Library with mostly Chinese books or if I am an Indian leader, I must have and maintain an  Indian library with mostly Indian books to be credible even if I am not really Indian and if I do not want to openly identify myself  as having some other nationality and loyalty while the leader or monarch of those good people.  I could not be a Muppet.  In fact, If I am an Indian leader, I must have and maintain an Indian population with mostly Indian people  with an income support for ALL the people that are citizens under my government to be credible even if I am not really Indian and if I do not want to openly identify myself  as having some other nationality, loyalty and a foreign  non English, Non Canadian, Non American, Non Human basic hegemony instinct if I have such a condition or symptom while the leader or monarch of those   people. The English people are not lousy people.  

Could you run an economy in such a way to achieve some anthropological, ancestral or developmental identity or is it to confirm some motive?  

But, we will make money on them all and all of their wild spending as provoked by the smart phone networks. We pay in 10 cents per minute 365 days per year and take it back at 40% sales tax.  This is good; yea?  We pay .010% of the first $EUD 10,000,000.00 sales tax collected every day to the heraldry fund that supports the Monarch personally and all Heritage Trust buildings, museums and galleries. .010%  of $EUD 10,000,000.00 is $Eud 100,000.00.    We support our governor; and government.     

            

///////////