ClIck here. Remember.......? Well, we know nothing happened and this was about trying to mug a black guy of his technology or of his little capable business name and I refer people to him and work with him.

 ClIck here.  Remember.......?   Well, we know nothing happened and this was about trying to mug a black guy of his technology or of his little capable business name and I refer people to him and work with him.  

Pat from Inverness will be answering all emailed questions this week.  He is also writing a book about a black civil rights worker that worked to negate positive moves forward in his own notion of black equality, that we should all be limited,  not so progressive about ownership or more career professionalism, but black and happy because that is how it was but he does not want anyone killed for talking about progress. Its confusing but this is what he says.  His rational denies the motive of others to ensure that there is choice to be involved in any chosen profession and no experience of exclusion in one's efforts to serve the greater community that will include members of the black and white and other communities. He also seems to say that he is not sure if his armed, violent resistance  of more black professionalism is about his own ego, his own anxiety  about social authority. There was a slave once that had a white ownership and a black ownership but at black ownership, he saw it was betrayal  in all that slavery connoted. He campaigned to be the informal President and informal owner among the slaves, some of them white also, and said  wouldn't it be nice if we could have a world without ownership, without formal ownership and rules  and this is what he was promising; promising a world of informal ownership?  But, even a slave would  say it is nice to know  what he owns since he would have owned his shoes, his personal items, his bible, his star wars movie and his Marvel movie collection in addition to his clothing  and  it is good to know who owns you before you are tossed between two battling owners where one is good and one is bad, so who really owns you is good to know since some owners  treated their human chattel citizens well since there was less money spent on the new acquisition of  citizens from Africa  after the bad owner abused them and underfunded them.   If ownership is uncertain, then we are more likely to be at odds with others over who owns that set of shoes or those wheels on the Mustang or that McDonalds Restaurant; that 3 bed house and farm maybe.  


We thank God for all the politicians.  But, either you want to own something or you don't. Maybe you resent formal legal  ownership. But, as Abraham said to Lot, Abraham will take and formally own the lands right of the valley and Lot can take and own what is to the left of the valley. There is no quarrel between us. So, if you are not going to own, then you need to at least have an agreement with someone in what might be an occupancy rental agreement or lease agreement.      

Maybe the mail is owned by the slave citizen as recipient, the farmer or the colonial governor of the colony in trust for the recipient but even a slave would want the mail system to work as he hopes to see his colonial citizenship, freedom and independence document arrive as applied  for just as the boss lady taught them so he can work and earn a salary. You stole the document and his job offer. You stole the reference letter from the boss lady.    You want us to pretend with you that nothing wrong has transpired.  You speak to the citizens like they are fools all day long on the CNN town square.  

   But, this backwards black equality activist stole the envelopes, stole the job reference letters and that hope for success was delayed but everyone knows you have it.  

He also seems to say that he is a latent cave man and gets very angry if you tell him not to copulate  with his niece who could be his daughter in the way his sister  chose to use the  water of her various brothers to "impregnation" herself.  

SDGCK is a (research only) Law Firm in the UK, Internationally, SDGCK is a research firm and library. 


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?

Post a Comment