Ownership is tantamount to the American dream. Maybe Piracy is Christopher Columbus" American dream; to pirate property owned by people who arrived from else where and sought sanctuary in a law abiding country; to own something once without having to pay the local Southern Mediterranean Machiavellian Prince. The collision between these forces is over. Click here for more.
Is that cement powder and varnish on the bread and on the donuts or in the patties? Is the apples phone weakening our teeth gum? It's a good phone otherwise. Them there Mohican aboriginals, black and white, in the Carolinas have been fighting formal ownership and fighting the constitution right in the Court House.
Maybe Murdaugh was lynching the phenomenon of ownership regardless of the complexion of the owner. He is disenfranchised in the economy without a sufficient income support and wanted to get it on in the Court and tell the Constitution in his own way that he is an economic victim of economic attrition; and say he needed to be accepted.
But, in the end he was also put down as the owner's lyncher and it seems the American revolutionary war continues in the Carolinas but the target is Washington and the Constitution that preserves and safeguards ownership and here we see the US Constitution is treated as a foreign culture by the white and the black Carolina aboriginal who are still having teething issues when it comes to ownership and the various formalities; and who would tolerate Murdaugh for years. This "war on ownership" game is over. The American dream or peace, order and good government is sacred. Ownership is tantamount to the American dream. Maybe Piracy is Christopher Columbus" American dream; to pirate property owned by people who arrived from else where and sought sanctuary in a law abiding country; to own something once without having to pay the local Southern Mediterranean Machiavellian Prince. The collision between these forces is over.
To cure this, ensure and aid the domestic tranquility for all citizens we commit to an income support for all North American citizens under NAFTA at no less than $70,000.00 USD equivalent as this amount is the global minimum standard. It is the last step in Covid; as run by the World Bank Organisation. Its also known as NO MO COVET or NMC or anti covet. You cannot travel until you comply and get your card; you financial vaccine on the grounds of your personal human safety and the purposes of national defence as it is intent on defending the national population from the job famines. Yet, higher amounts above $70,000.00 per year are earmarked for the North American economy. We are international people with international passports and international airports so we need an international income support that covers us any where on the globe as international people. When Americans or Canadians or Mexicans show up, we will feel like we have a Team Jersey on; a NAFTA jersey on with our NAFTA income support in our wallets.
There are some people receiving no support at all in North America at the moment. They qualify as refugees any where in the world; even in the Ukraine or England. Jamaica is now under Massachusetts for income support purposes. There will be a NAFTA support window on the internet if you would wish to receive your support paid directly to one of your bank accounts. Is it a Canada Trust Account?
Also we need to "Germany Chunnel" the UK Economy via the internet and ensure every UK citizen receives an income support, ending the dithering where those who qualify for benefits are being mistreated by profiteers in the system who are assigning applicant's entitlement to the job centre employee's friends and family in depriving the actual applicant and maybe some people receive 3 income support payments.
If the South Carolina Murdaugh judgement was based on circumstantial evidence and probability as fed to the jury, then how is there any conviction if, on the face of it, the Crown could not prove their case in our legal culture as based on the prima facie case? Prima facie; that sounds like culture, ancestry.
They need to prove a physical act causing death or a course of action and events that led to the murder like cut brake cables. Who cut my brake cables or ordered it? So, the Carolina judgement amounts to what is distilled from the Salem Witch trials that says our American Court Culture is in flux and has not become mature in terms of standards of evidence in that it's a Creole Court culture that would accept the allegations as suggested that a Salem man probably impossibly flew through a window and impossibly injured anyone. It cannot be believed or accepted as it is not only improbable; it is impossible. Probability is never evidence sufficient to convict in any Court. We say evidence on a balance of probability in Civil Courts can stand of there is evidence that is veracious. But the presentation of fraudulent evidence in a Civil Court or in a Tribunal is a Fraudulent statement. We are still having an arm wrestle on these issues; regarding these formal and informal Court Cultures? The first chapter of American colonial history is North American Aboriginal, the next chapter is Euro, African Spanish. The third chapter is Dutch. The fourth chapter is (English, Scott Irish Celtic), the fifth chapter is the one African ship called Amistad and the finale chapter is Creole American Aboriginal with tension between formal and informal cultures. It's in the blood of many; white and black Aboriginal. But, the formality promises balance and fairness. The response to this by the Christopher gene in the Aboriginal is what is the point of formal processes if you have authority over the system and that is where it starts to become Nazi when the white Aboriginal is not sufficiently prepared to conduct Magna Carta peace and often abuses the authority, accesses the offices of authority that are designed for peace. Could you formally pass a Law exam and then formally disappear in court with all of your formal resonance? The target is not Black and nor is it white or Egypt or Dunedin; but formality. This is illegal as based on what is illegal at 3107 since it's a 3107 and at 3107, they conspire to blow up buildings to then own the land that cannot be owned when it is Federal land. It's Terrorism whether or not it's Federal land. Why don't we see Falconerror wrestle with formalities with his insistence to Push the formally trained out of Court since you don't want the formally trained to interrupt you in your muddling. You have some kind of mindless insistence on being a Pretender and muddling. No one is beating you but you. How can we cooperate on our society's socioeconomic efficacy and ensure involvement for all where there is no need to challenge the constitution and the official rules of any Law Society in a testimony about Aboriginal informality over the official Government formalities? We could do a Job core for a kind of paid job core auxiliary police constable. Duty Counsel work and we could all participate; if Falconerror can if he needs to be accepted before the Court. I don't need to be accepted. I am accepted. I wanted to help people. I help people. I help. Warren has done no wrong but they wanted to try and lambaste him just as he bought a house with his little earnings. Anything you said that is negative about Angel Ronan(TM). is not improbable but also impossible. You know this. You are return the files and the one computer. If it's a trust order and the trust is vacated, why breach the trust and say you would destroy the two computers? You have no authority under the trust to destroy property. You can only return it.
They say Jamaicans run things. But, not all Jamaicans have worked out the same equation in running things for everyone's happiness; in spite of the tension between indigenous and received cultures or the formal and the informal. Some Pretend to be the king or the king's son and Rob the bank for money while expecting not to be arrested. But, how do you finance a car payment or a condo lease and settle in if you are evolved enough to see that you should want to settle in. Some agree that we should feel settled with the money; that we should all have an income support paid to us automatically and it will arrive weekly to your account. This is the Quebec experience and the Manitoba experience. It's the Illinois experience and the Delaware experience but the levels of Support are not always consistent with the reasonable Maslow needs that are synonymous with the economy's needs for guaranteed ensures economic stimulus to stave off recession. Without the surrogate populations from Asia, we would be in recession or depression at the moment. They have provided salve; economic salve. War is not the solution but an income support for all. But, there are Jamaicans in Manitoba who have dealt with this wrestle in the atmosphere between formal and informal cultures. Some families use a womb to reproduce. Some use bottles and bathtubs. But, all have an income support of no less than $50,000.00 per year as income support.
In the Murdaugh case, we have a few questions.
Should the Judge recuse himself if he knows Murdaugh professionally? That could be grounds for appeal and the court should have been notified. The prosecutor could decide. If he accepts the risk of bias and notifies defence counsel, then Defence counsel can decide but it seems neither party addressed the issue and the Prosecutor should have looked into it when attending at the trial scheduling office and checking for any conflicts of interest when convening the Court and also the evidently Honorable Judge to preside. The Crown...I mean the District Attorney should have checked on this issue before the trial was convened. The Trial could have been adjourned due to the honorable Judge's recusal if the issue came up on the 1st day or second day but when it comes up after the trial is concluded, it seems a mistrial is the only requisite conclusion.
There is an immediate mistral for the potential lack of impartiality on behalf of the Court and the immediate apprehension of potential bias or potential lack of fairness in rulings on the evidence.
What were the instructions provided to the Jury? Do they accord with national SCOTUS law? We already have a national consolidation and uniformity on Trial procedure and the rules of evidence.
Where there is doubt, doubt favors the accused. Probability is not sufficient to convict because if it is only probable, then it is also probably someone else; ALLEGATIONS THAT CANNOT BE PROVEN IN COURT. THIS WILL COVER WARREN ALSO REFUTE WHAT THE PRETTY DROP OUT VILLENOVA CHICK SAID ABOUT HIM AT THE TRIBUNAL AS SHE BROKE THE LAW IN THE TRIBUNAL TO CONFIRM WHAT SUBJECTS SHE FAILED AND REFUSED TO RE WRITE. SO ESSENTIALLY, SHE IS ASKING TO CONFIRM MY UNDERSTANDING OF HER SITUATION. YES; I KNOW YOU CANNOT DESTROY PROPERTY IN BREACH OF THE TRUST ORDER. HOW DID SHE GET INTO THE TRIBUNAL AS A BANK ROBBER? IN WARREN'S CASE, EVERYTHING SHE SAID IS IMPOSSIBLE AND THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WITH RESPECT TO HER ALLEGATIONS. THEY CANNOT BE PROVEN IN COURT OR ANY WHERE.
Is this about the Mockingbird....again? Well, it could be how you deal with Scrooge anthropology in English colonies where the Oliver and the Dodger's stolen apple becomes a stolen Benz as taken from a client at a Law Firm or stolen client trust account funds! But, maybe in this culture of formal and informal legal practice that amounts to formal challenges of the constitution in an informal civil war inside the court house, we see that the tensions leading to informality in the legal profession in various very scary ways is what you get with white Black Hawk and Mohicans that have been bred white but their innate expectations seem to tolerate it.
I CANNOT ABIDE THAT CULTURAL LEGAL JUMBULAYAH OR GUMBO !!! BUT, IT MEANS THAT IF THEY TOLERATE SCROOGE THIS IS HOW SCROOGE RETIRES; WITH A CONVICTION REGARDING MURDER OF HIS WIFE AND THE PIRACY(ARRRRRGH)!!!! OF 10,000 STOLEN HOMES WITH VEHICLES AND THE STOCK MARKET VERSION OF THIS PIRACY IS MAYDOFF!
WHAT ABOUT THE RESTITUTION OF THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME AND REPAYMENT TO THE VICTIMS? Are they dead and how many? MAYBE WE DO NOT HIDE THEIR DEATHS AND THE REAL CAUSE AND THE NEW CHARGES FOR THIS GENOCIDE AND THEFT OF CASH, VEHICLES AND REAL PROPERTY. MAYBE IT SHOULD BE 70 LIFE SENTENCES. IF HE DID NOT REALLY KILL HIS WIFE AND SHE IS ONLY WAITING IN COLUMBIA FOR HIM, HE SERVES TEN YEARS AS THE STANDARD SENTENCE OR IS IT A LIFE SENTENCE FOR EVERY DEAD CLIENT FOR THE VARIOUS FRAUDS, THEFTS AND MULTIPLE DEATHS CONTARY TO THE PEACE OF THE CAROLINAS; IN ADDITION TO CLAIMING FALSELY TO BE A MEMBER OF THE BAR AND COUNSEL.
YOU CANNOT INHERIT THIS QUALIFICATION. YOU NEED TO WORK BUCKO!! MURDAUGH REPRESENTS A WHOLE WORLD OF INFORMAL, ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF THE COURTS AND THE LAW PROFESSION. HOW DOES THE FBI ADDRESS THIS? ARE REAL GRADUATES AND REAL CALLS TO THE BAR THE TARGETS? WHAT IF THE MOVIE THE FIRM IS TELLING US THAT THIS IS THE REAL ISSUE? WHAT IF WE SAW GRISHAM'S BOOK THE PARTNER IN A MOVIE WHERE THERE IS ONE PARTNER THAT IS ONLY CASING AND KILLING HIS CLIENTS like maybe Murdaugh did WHILE REGISTERING THE CLIENTS' PROPERTY TO HIMSELF AND THEN HE SHIPS THE CLIENT IN A CONTAINER BACK TO COLUMBIA OR VANCOUVER OR JAMAICA WHERE THEY COME FROM? Its an aboriginal hatred of law and formal ownership that would look at the constitution, look at Murdaugh who said he needs to eat and then look the other way.
IS THIS WHAT EXPLAINS WARREN'S UNUSUAL SITUATION WITH THIS ONGOING ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF HIS FILE MATERIALS?
MAYBE NORTH AMERICA IS A POPULATION MADE FROM A REGENERATED COURT JESTER WITH AN ABORIGINAL CAVE MAN LIKE HALF KING IN THE DNA COMBINATION, RUNNING THROUGH MANY WHO FIND THEMSELVES IN COURT JOBS BUT THEY DID NOT REALLY GO TO SCHOOL AND WHAT THEY WANTED IS TO TESTIFY AND SAY THEY WERE DONE WRONG IN COURT IN THEIR PREVIOUS LIFE WITH A FUR TRAPPER MAN WHO ROSE UP AND WAS APPOINTED AS COUNSEL AFTER HE BOUGHT A SUIT FOR THE FIRST TIME IN DAWSON. BUT HE NEVER READ THE EVIDENCE; HE DID NOT KNOW HOW TO READ. GOD MAKES US RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAVE MAN; IT SEEMS AND WHAT HE MIGHT DO IF HE IS MISTREATED IN HIS HUNGER. HE SEEMS TO THE COURT RANSOM AND MAKE HIMSELF KING; WHEN, INSTEAD, HE IS SUPPOSED TO GET HIS INCOME SUPPORT AT NO LESS THAN $70000.00 PER YEAR AS INCOME SUPPORT. THAT IS WHY JESUS SAID HE HAD FLOCKS IN OTHER LANDS; JESUS IS REAL! HOW DOES A POLICE OFFICER DEAL WITH THIS WHEN WHO IS THE REAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY WHO WOULD HAVE TO SWAT ALL OF THESE COCK ROACHES OUT OF COURT WHETHER OR NOT THEY SAY THEY ARE DISTRICT COCK ROACH ATTORNEYS? IT FEELS LIKE JESUS THROWING THE MONEY CHANGERS OUT OF THE COURT....OR THE TEMPLE....DO YOU KNOW THE POOL OF SILOAM...OR IS IT THE POOL OF SOLOMON? DID MARY WASH HER CLOTHING IN THAT POOL AND BECOME IMMACULATELY INSEMINATED TO GIVE BIRTH TO HIM WHO IS BORN OF THE BLOOD AND THE WATER AND THE SPIRIT? GOD KNOWS. THIS IS WHERE YOU SEE THE CAVE MAN FROM CUMBRIA(GOOGLE CUMBRIA) IN ISRAEL RESENTING ANYONE WHO COULD TELL HIM ANYTHING ABOUT THE LAW WHEN IN THAT ERA, THE MAN FROM CUMBRIA WAS FINALLY GETTING THE REAL ROMAN KICK UP WITH FIRE AND OIL WHILE HIS HEROD COMPATRIOT IN ISRAEL WAS BEING TOLD THAT....IT IS WRITTEN. I CARRY ALL THIS CUMBRIA DNA AND SOME REUBEN ROMAN DNA SO I SEE THE PAIN ON BOTH SIDES; AYE!!
WE ARE DEALING WITH A STUBBORN CULTURE HERE THAT IS RESISTING THE CONSTITUTION RIGHT ON UP TO THE life, liberty and the ??pursuit of happiness SINCE THEY SAY ITS WHO YOU KNOW SON AND NEVER MIND ABOUT YOUR EDUCATION and you rip up the law society rules and court rules while you laugh at Warren who is the boy scout; AND IT SERVES NO ONE IF A PROBABILITY IS ACCEPTED AS EVIDENCE FOR A MURDER CONVICTION SO THEY WILL STRIKE THE CONVICTION, LAY AN INDICTMENT, SET A COURT DATE FOR HIS OTHER VARIOUS CRIMES, HOLD HIM IN HIS CURRENT DETENTION WITHOUT BAIL UNTIL HE ACCEPTS IT IF HE DOES FOR A LESSER SENTENCE OF 10 YEARS AS THE OFFENCES MENTIONED ARE LESSER AND INCLUDED OFFENCES APPEARING IN THE STATEMENT OF ALLEGED FACTS.
WE NEED TO EVOLVE IN TERMS OF EXPECTATIONS AND COURT FORMALITY; NOT GO BACKWARD WHEN NO ABORIGINAL IS SAFE. NO ONE IS SAFE AFTER WINNING BINGO IF PEOPLE COULD JUST ALLEGE YOU....XYZ AS RETRIBUTION FOR WINNING.
THE CONSTITUTION HAS NOT BEEN SERVED HERE BUT WE WILL FIND A WAY HERE TO DEFEND OUR CONSTITION AT HOME AND ABROAD IN SOUTH CAROLINA WHERE YOU FIND IT ON THE DARK SIDE OF PLUTO. ITS KIND OF NAZI THOUGH; ISNT IT IF PEOPLE COULD JUST SAY......AND HOLD YOU IN BREACH OF YOUR MAGNA CARTA RIGHTS?
THE PEOPLE WHO HAD HOPED TO LIVE OFF OF THESE PROCEEDS CAN MOVE TO...MINNESOTA !!! BUT, IF THERE WAS AN INCOME SUPPORT OF NO LESS THAN $70000.00 A YEAR FROM 14 YEARS OLD FOR EVERY NORTH AMERICAN, WE COULD CALM DOWN ABOUT LAW AND FORMALITY AS DETESTED BY TOUSSAINT L'CONDAMNDE AND THE ABORIGINAL AND MAYBE MAKE DUTY COUNSEL/PUBLIC DEFENDER AN EASY FOR MANY TO BE INVOLVED IN COURT. Raga Muffin(TM) is a new muffin and coffee shop concept as owned by Angel Ronan(TM) Consulting. The coffee could include roots like moringa.
Don't say it. I don't want to hear it.
How far have we come since the Salem Witch trials? Those innocent souls burned at the stake have been exonerated. Who took the Dutch Tudor man or Anglo Tudor man's farm?
LAII
By STHEU, DEARNT, GOOD, CONVOER & KEAT™ FIRM .
SIAA
EMAIL: INFO.ANGELRONAN@MAIL.COM.
If you would like to join, the monthly fee is $800.00 per month. There is no work here. Just tell people about our service, get them to phone OR email and we will help them. When they pay, you will receive $800.00 from every file retainer.
With notes from Warren A. Lyon, Criminal Defence Counsel. Warren was born during the Vietnam War and told them to stop the wicked something as it is hurting his people. Happily, they all have an income support now; over you....more than you....stupid American. I tell you this because I love the American. I want him to see him eat big at any restaurant where ever he may be in the world. This will be our hegemony in addition to fine, big American brand automobiles all over the world. The coolest thing is a Ford Mustang with racing stipes on the STRAND in London. or the TESLA at Piccadilly. Now, that is American Hegemony!!!! WE are Big. But, we need to get it damn straight for once for all North Americans...Joe says!!
Whoever wrote the LSUCD(Not LSD) Law exams will now run the Law Society with a Senior Ranked Police Officer who has also sworn an oath; like Warren. Is there a reason why Law Society employees do not swear oaths?
Comments
Post a Comment