New and improved with more Economic Power: 3x more efficient!!!! Would it be common sense to pay an income support to every citizen? The answer is yes for the benefit of the economy. John Adams saw this. Would it be a surprise and a shock if there is a population that has not accepted this common sense? They might be some kind of ethnographic reserve(with various complexions nonetheless) that has accessed our modern world before they could, as aboriginal souls, evolve fast enough to accept and embrace that world and all that this entails. We might be dealing with a cave man stronghold. LEVITICUS is an established modern world expectation with family units, cleanliness, safety and family demarcations (my family and wife /your family and wife) that enables, with cleanliness demanded by LEVITICUS, population stability and ease of multiplication. Instead, there is resistance. In the resistance, they make established expectations discuss above, and everything really a challenge as they rise to fields of influence to impact and benefit their own lives and the lives of their people in keeping with modern world expectations that include an income support for every citizen and permanent resident. But, instead, their people are less safe and secure. What if there was a universal income support for every citizen but no tap water for every citizen but only for some based on TRANSGENDER status or based on your Postal code? That would not be logical in any case. What if there was consistent regular tap water for every citizen but income support only for TRANSGENDER citizens? That would not be logical in any case. The economy produces nationally with national sales and productivity figures and must calculate supply and demand (ATP-Ability To Pay) solutions nationally also. The Income support solutions should be a national solution instead of a haphazard uncoordinated quilt and tapestry of disconnected ideas and ineffective misgiving. Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce the federal loan rate no lower than .5%. The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop cannot be a zero rate. The money, the national salaries and the coins carry a cost that demands payment with some rate at no less than .5%. it is best , however, to increase consumer activity, and buying power by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay in the struggle with job automation as they already don't have any money so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy as the effort to solve it is national; isn't it ? You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are reducing national GDP further. It is best to raise the ATP; a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon. . Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also. We could say it like this. Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce the federal loan rate no lower than .5%. The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop cannot be a zero rate. The money, the national salaries and the coins carry a cost that demands payment with some rate at no less than .5%. It is best , however, to increase consumer activity, and buying power by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay in the struggle with job automation as they( the people) already don't have any money so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy as the effort to solve the reduction in consumer activity is national; isn't it ? You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are actually reducing national GDP further. It is best to raise the ATP; a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon. Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also. For PJ, give us the money. For PJ(peace and joy). We could also say it like this as well. Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce the federal loan rate no lower than .5%. The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop concerning rate reduction cannot be a zero rate. The paper money, the national salaries for security and cash delivery and the cost of "solver" in the coins carry a cost that demands payment with national revenue generating at some rate no less than .5%. It is best, however, to increase consumer activity, and consumer buying power, that is consumer demand for goods by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay in the struggle with job automation as they( the people) do not have any money already so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy; as the effort to solve the reduction in consumer activity or increase it is a national effort ; isn't it ? We can pay for this $70,000.00 per year inclement support with an increase in VAT/sales tax to a more international, responsible 20% to cover the cost of the income support and use this sales tax mechanism to increase and decrease consumer activity. Rising sales tax reduces activity. Decreasing the sales tax rate increases the consumer activity(ACTIVITIES). . We can keep discussing Aboriginal emotions nonetheless. You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are actually reducing national GDP further. It is best to raise the ATP; a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon. Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also. Whether it's a powerful F15 fighter jet or the income support policy (also powerful), the question is your intentions. Maybe hatred and ignorance are also powerful economic forces that carry intention. You ask yourself why are you reading this. David was successful as a Leader as he borrowed the well settled answers from Egypt involving economies. His Egyptian wives, when they would sit at table with him, reminded him about the income support disbursements to the people. Your policies can defend your people or destroy them. Your F15 can defend the population or fail to defend them maybe attack your own population. Genocide can be visited on a population by an F15 carrying biological weapons or genocide can be visited on a population by a government that uses policies to starve the populations of requisite income support monies(requisite in an automation economy and all economies are ongoing automation economies dating back to Egypt), water or electricity. F15's are designed to defend the nation and economic policies are designed to defend the nation with its entire population. We thank God. Read these six definitions involving genocide. 1944 Raphael Lemkin, Polish lawyer of Jewish descent[6] New conceptions require new terms. By "genocide" we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin tide (killing), thus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homicide, infanticide, etc. Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.

 

New and improved with more Economic Power: 3x more efficient!!!! 

Would it be common sense to pay an income support to every citizen? The answer is yes for the benefit of the economy. John Adams saw this.   Would it be a surprise and a shock if there is a population that has not accepted this common sense? They might be some kind of ethnographic reserve(with various complexions nonetheless) that has accessed our modern world before they could, as aboriginal souls, evolve fast enough to accept and embrace that world and all that this entails. We might be dealing with a cave man stronghold.   LEVITICUS is an established modern world expectation with family units, cleanliness, safety and family demarcations (my family and wife /your family and wife) that enables, with cleanliness demanded by LEVITICUS,  population stability and ease of multiplication.     Instead, there is resistance. In the resistance, they make established expectations discuss above,  and everything really a challenge as they rise to fields of influence to impact and benefit their own lives and the lives of their people in keeping with modern world expectations that include an income support for every citizen and permanent resident. But, instead, their people are less safe and secure.  

What if there was a universal income support for every citizen but no tap water for every citizen but only for some based on TRANSGENDER status or based on your Postal code?    That would not be logical in any case.  

What if there was consistent regular tap water for every citizen but income support only for TRANSGENDER citizens?    That would not be logical in any case.     

The economy produces nationally with national sales and productivity figures and must calculate supply and demand (ATP-Ability To Pay) solutions nationally also.  The Income support solutions should be a national solution instead of a haphazard uncoordinated quilt and tapestry of disconnected ideas and ineffective misgiving. 

Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce the federal loan rate no lower than .5%. The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop cannot be a zero rate. The money, the national salaries and the coins carry a cost that demands payment with some rate at no less than .5%. it is best , however, to increase consumer activity, and buying power by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay in the struggle with job automation as they already don't have any money so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy as the effort to solve it is national; isn't it ? You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are reducing national GDP further. It is best to raise the ATP; a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon. . Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also.

We could say it like this. Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce  the federal loan rate no lower than .5%.    The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop cannot be a zero rate.  The money, the national salaries and the coins carry a cost that demands payment with some rate at no less than .5%.   It is best , however, to increase consumer activity, and buying power by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay  in the struggle with job automation as they( the people) already don't have any money so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy as the effort to solve the reduction in consumer activity is national; isn't it ? You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are actually reducing national GDP further. It is best to raise the ATP; a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon. Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also. For PJ, give us the money. For PJ(peace and joy).

We could also say it like this as well. Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce  the federal loan rate no lower than .5%.  The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop concerning rate reduction cannot be a zero rate.   The paper money, the national salaries for security and cash delivery and the cost of "solver" in the coins carry a cost that demands payment with national revenue generating at some rate no less than .5%.   It is best, however, to increase consumer activity, and consumer buying power, that is consumer demand for goods by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay  in the struggle with job automation as they( the people) do not have any money already so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy; as the effort to solve the reduction in consumer activity or increase it is a national effort ; isn't it ? We can pay for this $70,000.00 per year inclement support with an increase in VAT/sales tax to a more international, responsible 20% to cover the cost of the income support and use this sales tax mechanism to increase and decrease consumer activity. Rising sales tax reduces activity. Decreasing the sales tax rate increases the consumer activity(ACTIVITIES). . We can keep discussing Aboriginal emotions nonetheless. You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are actually reducing national GDP further. It is best to raise the ATP; a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon. Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also.

Whether it's a powerful F15 fighter jet or the income support policy (also powerful), the question is your intentions. Maybe hatred and ignorance are also powerful economic forces that carry intention.  You ask yourself why are you reading this. David was successful as a Leader as he borrowed the well settled answers from Egypt involving economies.   His Egyptian wives, when they would sit at table with him, reminded him about the income support disbursements to the people.  Your policies can defend your people or destroy them. Your F15 can defend the population or fail to defend them maybe attack your own population.  Genocide can be visited on a population by an F15 carrying biological weapons or genocide can be visited on a population by a government that uses policies to starve the populations of requisite income support monies(requisite in an automation economy and all economies are ongoing automation economies dating back to Egypt), water or electricity.  F15's are designed to defend the nation and economic policies are designed to defend the nation with its entire population.  We thank God. 

Read these six definitions involving genocide. 

1944    Raphael Lemkin, Polish lawyer of Jewish descent[6]    New conceptions require new terms. By "genocide" we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin tide (killing), thus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homicide, infanticide, etc. Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.