The chapter you have been missing in your theology begins with the first time you dropped a baby in a toilet at 10 years old while using the toilet and moving the number 2 and 3 in you and no one told you what happened afterwards. When you are having a baby accidentally while doing a number 2, it's called a number 3 from now on. You got dressed the next morning, went to school and eventually there was a sex ed class when you were 16 years old. Now, you are 50 and you had temporary husbands for as long as they could work out how to please you in bed but if they had a bad day at work and became distracted from what you made the ultimate "get up for at least 8 minutes of Coitus"importance you let them go and tried to get a gang of people to cut them up because you felt rejected. You threw things and told him to get out when he only took 5 minutes and 22 seconds on the timer that night when has had a bad day at work. He grabbed his Motorola superior mobile phone, his Kenneth Cole suit and asked what is the point of bible study if this is what the average Christian, church going single woman will do in breaking up over nothing? What if you broke up with a woman if she was too content with 57 seconds and told you to stop where you could call her frigid? Man or woman, we should make the table the purpose and most important and enjoy the time. The dog can tickle your toes with his tail and so can your husband. But, you nervous throw out the dog with your disappointment. You throw out your husband when he is a few seconds or minutes off the clock and then now you have no immediate provider for full body tickles anywhere. The woman who said stop after 63 seconds calls you fickle when you got angry and broke up, calling her frigid but I am with her now at 57 seconds as I did what she eject wanted since this is where we agree. Now, you are single and here she is in this photo with someone else with more settled people that have made the table the purpose. Thank GOD. Your daughter also Aboriginal and says she owns the Courts as a Black Navajo in Inverness. She is also sick about formal family structures and is always hoping for a reason to break up no matter who she is with. She is Forty, free and single with no husband and no children. It cannot be that Abraham and Sarai are her role models being single and barren at 90 years old. But, what do we expect from a young man or woman except that they will get married by 18 years old on High School Graduation day and hopefully she is not the kind to steal your credit card in the mail. But, if she does what do you do? What does your family do? You just have to suggest he got taken on the subway by a bum subway ticket enforcement officer and has a Court date when they never read the transfer that is also proof of payment you idiot and now you owe him at least $10,000.00 in a law suit if he was going to sue. This didn't really happen but someone at your job whispered he is not coming back and he almost had an accident that day on the way to Court. But, he survived as he was determined to see you and continue his thankfulness at the table.

The chapter you have been missing in your theology begins with the first time you dropped a baby in a toilet at 10 years old while using the toilet and moving the number 2 and 3  in you and no one told you what happened afterwards.  When you are having a baby accidentally while doing a number 2, it's called a number 3 from now on. You got dressed the next morning, went to school and eventually there was a sex ed class when you were 16 years old.  Now, you are 50 and you had temporary husbands for as long as they could work out how to please you in bed but if they had a bad day at work and became distracted from what you made the ultimate "get up for at least 8 minutes of Coitus"importance you let them go and tried to get a gang of  people to cut them up because you felt rejected. You threw things and told him to get out when he only took 5 minutes and 22 seconds on the timer that night when has had a bad day at work. He grabbed his Motorola superior mobile phone, his Kenneth Cole suit and asked what is the point of bible study  if this is what the average Christian, church going single woman will do in breaking up over nothing? What if you broke up with a woman if she  was too content with 57 seconds  and told you to stop where you could call her frigid? Man or woman, we should make the table the purpose and  most important and enjoy the time. The dog can tickle your toes  with his tail  and so  can your husband.   But, you nervous throw out the dog with your disappointment.     You throw out your husband when he is a few seconds or minutes off the clock and then now you have no immediate provider for full body  tickles anywhere.   The woman who said stop after 63 seconds calls you fickle when you got angry and broke up, calling her frigid  but I am with her now at 57 seconds  as I  did what she eject wanted since this is where we agree.   Now, you are single and here she is in this photo with someone else with  more settled people that have made the table the purpose.  Thank GOD.  

Your daughter also Aboriginal and says she owns the Courts as a Black Navajo in Inverness. She is also sick about formal family structures and is always hoping for a reason to break up no matter who she is with. She is Forty, free and single with no husband and no children. It cannot be that Abraham and Sarai are her role models being single and barren at 90 years old. But, what do we expect from a young man or woman except that they will get married by 18 years old on High School Graduation day and hopefully she is not the kind to steal your credit card in the mail. But, if she does what do you do? What does your family do? You just have to suggest he got taken on the subway by a bum subway ticket enforcement officer and has a Court date when they never read the transfer that is also proof of payment you idiot and now you owe him at least $10,000.00 in a law suit if he was going to sue. This didn't really happen but someone at your job whispered he is not coming back and he almost had an accident that day on the way to Court. But, he survived as he was determined to see you and continue his thankfulness at the table.



 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment