A man was absconding from a Court date and some how ended up passing out at a Hounslow tube station. He was apprehended by police who saw the charges of fail to appear in Court in the Siemens Nixdorf laptops in their Hyundai hybrid or BMW SUVs. They took him to a detention near by, awaiting a bail hearing in Welwyn Garden. It should have taken 24 hours but they were told to wait for a special hearing after the London team made contact with Welwyn. It was to be set for a resolution of the matter and not a bail hearing with a consideration of the time served up front if he chose to accept an early plea offer or he could ask for a set date, awaiting disclosure. He did not have disclosure to see all the information involving the charges brought against him so that he might make full answer and defence but he already served five days that actually become 45 days, waiting for the special hearing as this sometimes happens as they wait for a special JP or Judge needed in the circumstances, involving involuntary intoxication. On the 47th day, the Welwyn Soldier Officers picked him up in London for a standard transfer and brought him to Court. He chose to plead and take time served at 47 days up front. I think it was penciled in under the circumstances as 30 days served in the community for an early plea if he had surrendered for failing to appear in Court.


A man was absconding from a Court date and some how ended up passing out at a Hounslow tube station.  He was apprehended by police who saw the charges of fail to appear in Court in the Siemens Nixdorf laptops in their Hyundai hybrid or BMW SUVs.    

They took him to a detention near by, awaiting a bail hearing in Welwyn Garden.  It should have taken 24 hours but they were told to wait for a special hearing after the London team made contact with Welwyn.  It was to be set for a resolution of the matter and not a bail hearing with a consideration of the time served up front if he chose to accept an early plea offer or he could ask for a set date, awaiting disclosure. He did not have disclosure to see  all the information involving the charges brought against him  so that he might make full answer and defence but he already served five days that actually become 45 days, waiting for the special hearing as this sometimes happens as they wait for a special JP or Judge needed in the circumstances, involving involuntary intoxication. On the 47th day, the Welwyn Soldier Officers picked him up in London for a standard transfer and brought him to Court. He chose to plead and take time served at 47 days up front.  I think it was penciled in under the circumstances as 30 days   served in the community for an early plea if he had surrendered for failing to appear in Court. 




 





   



 

       











 

Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?