There is a University in every corner of London. Mathematically, we can have more than four corners in any shape or polygon. But, what if there is a University in every corner? What if there are 12 corners in the polygon? You will have to be the smartest people in the world with all of these schools but your economy belies this notion. So, then I went to Aldi 's and I saw a gate at the front door and a bar code reader; something about you need an app to get in the shop. But, I left my phone at my desk at work during lunch. So.....so...well..so I looked around and saw a Walmart and went to Walmart that did not require any bar code to get in. I didn't really have time to get back to my desk and download an app to get in to Aldi to get my three green apples for lunch; and what does the app prove? It proves Nothing except that I have a phone. But, if the supermarket industry is based on convenience shopping, it's not convenient or conducive to the chain to delay the customer in giving the one dollar or one pound he intends to spend. It's not convenient. Anybody can get a phone. He will go next door. In fact, it is impedance and gimmicky. The supermarket should just want the money and for you to get in and spend it quickly. We left our phone in the vehicles or at home when I want jogging. It is an idiot who would do this. It's a 30 second decision as to where you shop. It takes you three seconds to walk away.

 There is a University in every corner of London.  Mathematically, we can  have more than four corners in any shape or polygon.  But, what if there is a University in every corner?  What if there are 12 corners in the polygon?  You will have to be the smartest people in the world with all of these schools  but your economy belies this notion.  So, then I went to Aldi 's and I saw a gate at the front door and a bar code reader; something about you need an app to get in the shop. But, I left my phone at my desk at work during lunch. So.....so...well..so I looked around and saw a Walmart and went to Walmart that did not require any bar code to get in.  I didn't really have time to get back to my desk and download an app to get in to Aldi to get my three green apples for lunch; and what does the app prove? It proves Nothing except that I have a phone.  But, if the supermarket industry is based on convenience shopping, it's not convenient or conducive to the chain to delay the customer in giving the one dollar or one pound he intends to spend. It's not convenient. Anybody can get a phone.   He will go next door.  In fact, it is impedance and gimmicky.  The supermarket should just want the money and for you to get in and spend it quickly.   We left our phone in the vehicles or at home when I want jogging.  It is an idiot who would do this.  It's a 30 second decision as to where you shop. It takes you three seconds to walk away.      



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment