You could be a serial mugger or shoplifter but it does not mean you have shoplifted by just being in the shops and walking past the door with a can of soup in your hand. The question is what did you do in the shop on that occasion? Did you walk out the door with soups in your hand? Did you purchase the soup? Do you have a receipt to defend yourself against accusation; oh no? Did you walk out the door in an honest mistake? When you are taken to Court for the third time in a month, what do you say on the fourth charge? What do you say when you failed to appear in the Court to receive all the information related to the charge so you can make full answer and defence? Were you poisoned, drugged? Maybe this is your ancestral testimony from 1928 when your real mother and father were shot while shoplifting at Macy's on Fifth Avenue. They traveled in from Albany. But, it's not a defence to the charges. In your honest mistake, could anyone say you are guilty? They cannot but it looks like you were arrested in a vehicle; oh no... and it's still maybe a mistake but what do you tell the court? You tell them the truth. You might have shoplifted 3000 times but at the age of 99, maybe it's the first time you made an honest mistake. You became a believer in Christ years ago but never really repented for this until the night before the current situation. Click here.

 


    You could be a serial mugger or shoplifter but it does not mean you have shoplifted by just being in the shops and walking past the door with a can of soup in your hand.    The question is what did you do in the shop on that occasion?   Did you walk out the door with soups in your hand? Did you purchase the soup?  Do you have a receipt to defend yourself against accusation; oh no?   Did you walk out  the door in an honest mistake?  When you are taken to Court for the third time in a month, what do you say on the fourth charge?  What do you say when you failed to appear in the Court to receive all the information related to the charge so you can make full answer and defence?    Were you poisoned, drugged? Maybe this is your ancestral testimony from 1928 when your real mother and father were shot while shoplifting at Macy's on Fifth Avenue.  They traveled in from Albany. But, it's not a defence to the charges.    In your honest mistake, could anyone say you are guilty? They cannot but it looks like you were arrested in a vehicle; oh no... and it's still maybe a mistake but what do you tell the court?  You tell them the truth. You might have shoplifted 3000 times but at the age of 99, maybe it's the first time you made an honest mistake. You became a believer in Christ years ago but never really repented for this until the night before the current situation.  If so, you are innocent then in your honest mistake. But, if you are offered time served on an early plea and you already have spent 2 days in jail for shoplifting on a previous offence, then maybe take the opportunity to plead if you want..if your conscience demands that you tell the Court you are genuinely innocent; this time and you can then have a trial or bring a motion and tell the Court.   Have a good day.  You might have to bring a motion with affidavit evidence to state your claim and defence of honest mistake or that you were involuntarily intoxicated at Stab-Bucks although it is your 10th time before the Court about your hunting and gathering; a bitch!  You will not embarrass me. But, you are cute as Ms. POCAHONTAS, 1992 and you dress nice but forget the Prophetess thing until you can work out how to keep your hands off of the stuff in the shops, your type writer away from plagiarism and your mouth off of all the Deacon's dicks so you can be a Pastor's friend and wife.


 You could be a serial mugger or shoplifter but it does not mean you have shoplifted by just being in the shops and walking past the door with a can of soup in your hand.    The question is what did you do in the shop on that occasion?   Did you walk out the door with soups in your hand? Did you purchase the soup?  Do you have a receipt to defend yourself against accusation; oh no?   Did you walk out  the door in an honest mistake?  When you are taken to Court for the third time in a month, what do you say on the fourth charge?  What do you say when you failed to appear in the Court to receive all the information related to the charge so you can make full answer and defence?    Were you poisoned, drugged? Maybe this is your ancestral testimony from 1928 when your real mother and father were shot while shoplifting at Macy's on Fifth Avenue.  They traveled in from Albany. But, it's not a defence to the charges.    In your honest mistake, could anyone say you are guilty? They cannot but it looks like you were arrested in a vehicle; oh no...and it's still maybe a mistake but what do you tell the court?  You tell them the truth.  Have a good day.  You might have to bring a motion with affidavit evidence to state your claim and defence of honest mistake or that you were involuntarily intoxicated at Stab-Bucks although it is your 10th time before the Court about your hunting and gathering; rather!  You will not embarrass me. But, you are cute as Ms. POCAHONTAS, 1992 and you dress nice but forget the Prophetess thing until you can work out how to keep your hands off of the stuff in the shops if you are not intending to pay since we have all lost a forest that might be our native hunting ground; a first lost  in some expression of authority that is foreign to our Aboriginal hopes and dreams to walk free but shoplifting says they can lose you also or you will lose you; and keep  your mouth off of all the Deacon's dicks so you can be a Pastor's friend and wife. That would be nice; rather. I already know your 47 year old cellulite very well maybe once but Cosmopolitan is poor people who break up and Cosmopolitan is dead. Only poor people break up.  You want to raise 4 kids to 18 years of age with your male spouse maybe three times in your life. It's not too late. Ideally, you start at 20 years old. 

You were convicted Ms. Arthur for threatening Wallen and Grance and the entire family. You are dead. Your 1/12 Sasquatch DNA is not a defence; nor is your Aboriginal anger.  We are all Aboriginal.  We are all Growing but you are just shame Ms. Arthur.  You are just a dead drug whole bitch.  Ask me if I am going church? You are hell going to church. You beat Gerral and Anto for shoplifting but you shoplift. You going church?

You were convicted Ms. Arthur for threatening Wallen and Grance and the entire family. You are dead. As you are dead, its not a threat to say you are dead. You are dead.  Enjoy your rest.  Your 1/12 Sasquatch DNA is not a defence; nor is your Aboriginal anger.  We are all Aboriginal.  We are all Growing but you are just shame Ms. Arthur.  You are just a dead drug whole bitch.  Ask me if I am going church? You are hell going to church. You beat Gerral and Anto for shoplifting but you shoplift. You going church? 






 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon with Cheuy Leon Stephen Lam Tom. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power (ability to pay/ATP) across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.

Post a Comment