You could be a serial mugger or shoplifter but it does not mean you have shoplifted by just being in the shops and walking past the door with a can of soup in your hand. The question is what did you do in the shop on that occasion? Did you walk out the door with soups in your hand? Did you purchase the soup? Do you have a receipt to defend yourself against accusation; oh no? Did you walk out the door in an honest mistake? When you are taken to Court for the third time in a month, what do you say on the fourth charge? What do you say when you failed to appear in the Court to receive all the information related to the charge so you can make full answer and defence? Were you poisoned, drugged? Maybe this is your ancestral testimony from 1928 when your real mother and father were shot while shoplifting at Macy's on Fifth Avenue. They traveled in from Albany. But, it's not a defence to the charges. In your honest mistake, could anyone say you are guilty? They cannot but it looks like you were arrested in a vehicle; oh no... and it's still maybe a mistake but what do you tell the court? You tell them the truth. You might have shoplifted 3000 times but at the age of 99, maybe it's the first time you made an honest mistake. You became a believer in Christ years ago but never really repented for this until the night before the current situation. Click here.

 


    You could be a serial mugger or shoplifter but it does not mean you have shoplifted by just being in the shops and walking past the door with a can of soup in your hand.    The question is what did you do in the shop on that occasion?   Did you walk out the door with soups in your hand? Did you purchase the soup?  Do you have a receipt to defend yourself against accusation; oh no?   Did you walk out  the door in an honest mistake?  When you are taken to Court for the third time in a month, what do you say on the fourth charge?  What do you say when you failed to appear in the Court to receive all the information related to the charge so you can make full answer and defence?    Were you poisoned, drugged? Maybe this is your ancestral testimony from 1928 when your real mother and father were shot while shoplifting at Macy's on Fifth Avenue.  They traveled in from Albany. But, it's not a defence to the charges.    In your honest mistake, could anyone say you are guilty? They cannot but it looks like you were arrested in a vehicle; oh no... and it's still maybe a mistake but what do you tell the court?  You tell them the truth. You might have shoplifted 3000 times but at the age of 99, maybe it's the first time you made an honest mistake. You became a believer in Christ years ago but never really repented for this until the night before the current situation.  If so, you are innocent then in your honest mistake. But, if you are offered time served on an early plea and you already have spent 2 days in jail for shoplifting on a previous offence, then maybe take the opportunity to plead if you want..if your conscience demands that you tell the Court you are genuinely innocent; this time and you can then have a trial or bring a motion and tell the Court.   Have a good day.  You might have to bring a motion with affidavit evidence to state your claim and defence of honest mistake or that you were involuntarily intoxicated at Stab-Bucks although it is your 10th time before the Court about your hunting and gathering; a bitch!  You will not embarrass me. But, you are cute as Ms. POCAHONTAS, 1992 and you dress nice but forget the Prophetess thing until you can work out how to keep your hands off of the stuff in the shops, your type writer away from plagiarism and your mouth off of all the Deacon's dicks so you can be a Pastor's friend and wife.


 You could be a serial mugger or shoplifter but it does not mean you have shoplifted by just being in the shops and walking past the door with a can of soup in your hand.    The question is what did you do in the shop on that occasion?   Did you walk out the door with soups in your hand? Did you purchase the soup?  Do you have a receipt to defend yourself against accusation; oh no?   Did you walk out  the door in an honest mistake?  When you are taken to Court for the third time in a month, what do you say on the fourth charge?  What do you say when you failed to appear in the Court to receive all the information related to the charge so you can make full answer and defence?    Were you poisoned, drugged? Maybe this is your ancestral testimony from 1928 when your real mother and father were shot while shoplifting at Macy's on Fifth Avenue.  They traveled in from Albany. But, it's not a defence to the charges.    In your honest mistake, could anyone say you are guilty? They cannot but it looks like you were arrested in a vehicle; oh no...and it's still maybe a mistake but what do you tell the court?  You tell them the truth.  Have a good day.  You might have to bring a motion with affidavit evidence to state your claim and defence of honest mistake or that you were involuntarily intoxicated at Stab-Bucks although it is your 10th time before the Court about your hunting and gathering; rather!  You will not embarrass me. But, you are cute as Ms. POCAHONTAS, 1992 and you dress nice but forget the Prophetess thing until you can work out how to keep your hands off of the stuff in the shops if you are not intending to pay since we have all lost a forest that might be our native hunting ground; a first lost  in some expression of authority that is foreign to our Aboriginal hopes and dreams to walk free but shoplifting says they can lose you also or you will lose you; and keep  your mouth off of all the Deacon's dicks so you can be a Pastor's friend and wife. That would be nice; rather. I already know your 47 year old cellulite very well maybe once but Cosmopolitan is poor people who break up and Cosmopolitan is dead. Only poor people break up.  You want to raise 4 kids to 18 years of age with your male spouse maybe three times in your life. It's not too late. Ideally, you start at 20 years old. 

You were convicted Ms. Arthur for threatening Wallen and Grance and the entire family. You are dead. Your 1/12 Sasquatch DNA is not a defence; nor is your Aboriginal anger.  We are all Aboriginal.  We are all Growing but you are just shame Ms. Arthur.  You are just a dead drug whole bitch.  Ask me if I am going church? You are hell going to church. You beat Gerral and Anto for shoplifting but you shoplift. You going church?

You were convicted Ms. Arthur for threatening Wallen and Grance and the entire family. You are dead. As you are dead, its not a threat to say you are dead. You are dead.  Enjoy your rest.  Your 1/12 Sasquatch DNA is not a defence; nor is your Aboriginal anger.  We are all Aboriginal.  We are all Growing but you are just shame Ms. Arthur.  You are just a dead drug whole bitch.  Ask me if I am going church? You are hell going to church. You beat Gerral and Anto for shoplifting but you shoplift. You going church? 






 


Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?