Push Button and People; Transcript.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2GNIYhi8Dw&t=5s
00:00
[Music]
00:47
machines without human being machines
00:51
without human beings that uncanny
00:54
spectacle is automation a foreboding
00:57
frightening word a word to send a
01:00
shudder through a man or a woman or a
01:02
child even in periods of full employment
01:04
when wages are decent jobs are plentiful
01:07
and times are good but during a
01:11
depression or a recession when men and
01:14
women and children seem to be an
01:15
overproduction then automation is a word
01:19
to strike terror and any human heart
01:21
especially if that human heart beats in
01:24
a wage earners breast now people know in
01:27
a general way what automation means 150
01:33
years ago the world went through
01:35
something called the Industrial
01:36
Revolution we found out how to build
01:39
machines that could perform much of the
01:41
mechanical work men and women used to do
01:45
machines replace the muscles in our
01:47
backs and arms and legs but you still
01:50
needed human beings to direct the
01:52
machines to do the thinking to do the
01:54
brain work but now automation provides
01:57
machines that do the brain work that
01:59
makes the decisions men and women used
02:01
to make in the factories electric I
02:04
limit switches tapes punch cards
02:08
servomechanism everybody knows that but
02:12
what does this mechanical brain was a
02:15
mechanical muscle do to people to jobs
02:18
to the way we live will whatever happens
02:22
happen automatically can we do anything
02:27
well not long ago UAW President Walter
02:31
Reuther was in Washington DC there the
02:35
members of a senatorial committee asked
02:37
him these very questions so now let's go
02:40
to Washington and Walter Reuther here is
02:43
mr. Ruger and here is the senatorial
02:46
committee how does automation look when
02:50
you see it in the plan
02:52
what happens when automation comes to a
02:55
plan let's let senator languor of North
02:58
Dakota ask the question senator Langer
03:01
mr. Luthor hey that these a big
03:04
corporations 47 million two hundred
03:07
million dollars into autumn movie
03:10
automotive machinery whatever it may be
03:14
how many men do that without a word well
03:18
hard give you an exact figure these are
03:21
some of the things we'd like to know
03:22
more about we do know we do know that we
03:26
have thought the impact of automation I
03:29
work first time I went to work in the
03:31
automotive industry was back in nineteen
03:32
twenty seven in February they were
03:35
making the last Model T Ford under
03:37
langer and you know all about a Model T
03:40
because up in your country they were
03:42
very handy back to the days when the
03:44
roads weren't very good there any
03:46
politics to drive right I wouldn't be
03:49
surprised as they were I think God I
03:52
Senate language bill poet my campaign to
03:54
the Model T on that sir anyway when I
03:57
went to work at forward to 1927 this was
04:00
before we had automation 2,000 workers
04:04
on individual machines the make and
04:06
model tianjin which is a relatively
04:08
simple piece of mechanism I mean they
04:10
board each cylinder separately and they
04:12
did all the other things on separate
04:14
operation 1951 the ford motor company
04:18
opened up a new engine plant in
04:20
cleveland ohio adjacent to the Municipal
04:23
Airport it was the first fully automated
04:26
engine plant they take a rough casting
04:30
or a v8 engine which is a very complex
04:32
piece of mechanism comparable model t
04:34
engine block they bring it from the
04:36
foundry and feed it into this automated
04:38
machining line completely automatic and
04:42
without a workers hand touching that
04:44
engine block 14 and six tenths minutes
04:47
later it's fully machined I went through
04:50
that plant many years back to me people
04:53
who were showing me around said to me I
04:55
couldn't already see the workers because
04:57
they're just a few here and a few there
04:58
electric paddles red and green lights
05:00
going on that shows whether the machine
05:02
was operating to standard when all the
05:04
green lights were on it meant that every
05:06
to a battery of machines was operating
05:09
to performance meeting these precise
05:11
tolerances of the machining operation
05:13
when a amber light came on the machine
05:16
was still operating that this was a
05:18
signal as the tool in station number 82
05:21
was becoming fatigue the workers got a
05:23
replacement tool walked over in front of
05:25
82 when the red light went on a machine
05:27
stops put the new tool in the green
05:29
light came on she went on without a
05:31
workers hand touching that 14 and six
05:33
tenths minutes later it was fully
05:35
machines so they said to me aren't you
05:37
worried about how you're going to
05:39
collect union dues from all these
05:40
machines I said you know the thought
05:43
never occurred to me what I'm worried
05:45
about is how you're going to sell ford
05:46
cars all these machines you know you can
05:49
automate the production of automobiles
05:50
but consumers are still made thank God
05:53
in the old-fashioned way this is our car
05:56
trouble this is our trouble Model T to
06:01
experimental model electronic flash from
06:05
muscle and blood to the automated engine
06:08
line mr. ruther tell us what has this
06:11
meant economically to the automobile
06:13
industry if you take some overall
06:16
figures which I think indicates what's
06:18
happening in terms of productivity in
06:21
1947 the industry made four million
06:23
seven hundred and ninety eight thousand
06:26
cars and try and we had a workforce in
06:29
1947 or six hundred and forty eight
06:32
thousand eight hundred workers in 1957
06:36
ten years later we made seven million
06:38
two hundred and twenty thousand cars and
06:40
trucks with a workforce of six hundred
06:42
and fifty two thousand workers in other
06:45
words in those ten years we had an
06:46
increase in the total production of cars
06:49
of fifty point five percent without an
06:52
increase of one half of one percent in
06:54
the labor force so that if you take the
06:57
level of production in 47 and the level
07:00
of production in 57 and the level of
07:02
employment in 47 the level of
07:04
apartment in 57 you find this production
07:07
when a 50 point five percent
07:10
unemployment and went up only one half
07:13
of one percent what Walter Reuther is
07:15
saying is that American companies in the
07:17
last 11 years have bought and built 385
07:21
billion dollars worth of new factories
07:23
and new equipment much of it automated
07:26
equipment in the auto industry alone the
07:30
big three have invested seven billion
07:32
two hundred million dollars in modern
07:34
automated facilities and the result has
07:38
been unemployment like this unemployment
07:42
like these unemployed General Motors
07:44
workers there they are here we are
07:49
people wanting jobs meeting jobs and
07:53
there are the new factories modern as
07:57
all get-out but closed down tight since
08:01
this is the way things have worked out
08:03
mr. Luthor you oppose all this expansion
08:06
we don't adjust to that expansion in our
08:09
productive capacity because we know the
08:11
workers that I represent they're grown
08:15
people they know that there are no
08:16
economic static losses that you can't
08:19
get something for nothing that you can
08:20
only have higher living standards and
08:22
more the good things of life only as you
08:25
create the economic wealth by the
08:28
application of human labor and human
08:30
intelligence to the tools of economic
08:33
abundance and the economic resources
08:35
that we have access to so they say fine
08:38
we've got a bigger plant capacity we've
08:40
got more modern and more productive
08:42
tools but they say if we aren't using
08:45
these tools and we've got idle capacity
08:48
and unemployment then why and the answer
08:51
is we are using our productive capacity
08:55
because we haven't got the purchasing
08:57
power in the hands of millions of
08:59
families necessary to translate you will
09:03
need into demand on the store colors of
09:06
America and that's why we're in trouble
09:09
we're in trouble Walter Reuther says in
09:12
a sense these machines can only do
09:14
almost everything a human being can
09:17
too but not everything machines don't
09:20
buy automobiles for example and that
09:23
means unemployment all right since this
09:26
is the situation is the UAW opposed to
09:29
automation many people at least have
09:32
been told that unions opposed
09:34
technological advances mr. Luthor what
09:37
about that I been very sad when i hear a
09:42
labor spokesman elegant improved
09:45
technology you know King Canute couldn't
09:48
stop the flow of the tide and labor kept
09:51
at the slowest technology labor option
09:54
welcome technology you haven't gotten
09:56
off half lift on automation I shall see
09:58
that you get them because we have we
10:01
have been standing on the house stop
10:03
saying give us the best automation you
10:05
can bring in give us the most productive
10:07
truth because we know it's the only way
10:11
we can have more is to make more and the
10:13
only way you can make more to have more
10:14
productive cold we have been leading the
10:17
parade for automation we want automation
10:20
we want the peaceful use of the atom
10:23
because only as we apply human labor
10:28
whether it be with hand or with brain to
10:31
the tools of production can we create
10:35
the economic well that we want to share
10:37
this is a general motors contract we
10:40
signed in 1955 on page 66 section 100
10:46
reads as follows this is all of our
10:48
agreement my signatures at the end of
10:50
this agreement it reads as follows and I
10:52
quote the annual improvement factor
10:55
provided herein recognizes that a
10:58
continuing improvement in the standards
11:00
of living of employees depends upon
11:02
technological progress better tools
11:05
methods processes and equipment and
11:08
cooperative attitude on the part of all
11:10
parties and such progress if further
11:13
recognize it further recognizes a
11:15
principle that to produce more with the
11:17
same amount of human effort is a sound
11:19
economic and social objective we want
11:23
the best tools the general motors can
11:25
buy we want the most productive
11:28
Automation machinery that the General
11:30
Motors and Ford and Chrysler can create
11:32
in cooperation with machine tool
11:34
industry on this there is no argument we
11:38
know we can have more only if the truth
11:41
of production create more and we want
11:44
the most productive tools available let
11:47
us suppose that we have no ottoman
11:49
automation no multiple drills no huge
11:54
prefers to the subframes what in your
11:58
judgment would be the cause to learn or
12:00
no automobile today compared with the
12:03
price that is actually a change in the
12:05
market if we did not have the tools of
12:09
mass production and economic abundant
12:11
person it would be no automobile
12:13
industry it will be a few pull around by
12:16
hand and only a few fellows who were
12:18
millionaire support car owners would
12:20
have them there just be a handful and
12:22
the roads would still be muddy and so
12:24
forth we all know that but why do we
12:26
make progress we make progress because
12:29
management wants to drive ahead they
12:31
want to make more money they want to get
12:33
more the things that they want but
12:35
workers when they drive for higher wages
12:37
why is it in a country whether where you
12:41
have wages why is it that their
12:44
rate of technology is always floor
12:46
because when manpower is cheaper than
12:48
machines nobody gets the machine but
12:51
when you raise wages and its cost more
12:54
to have men power machines you invest in
12:57
technology and the drive for higher
13:00
wages is perhaps the most powerful
13:03
motivation that accelerate technological
13:05
progress on one thing Walter Reuther and
13:08
President Eisenhower are agreed
13:10
Automation by itself is not good or bad
13:13
it is like a knife or high explosive it
13:17
can be used to advance the well-being of
13:20
people then it is good or it can be used
13:24
to produce dark hopeless tragedy and
13:26
then it is evil but the question is how
13:31
do you tame automation how do you make
13:34
it serve people the uaw says when men or
13:39
women are laid off because of autumn
13:41
asian when the plant moves people should
13:44
be given new jobs if there are not new
13:47
jobs they should be given moving
13:49
allowances to places where there are
13:51
jobs if they need training they should
13:54
get training if they have to be
13:57
re-educated for new jobs then they
13:59
should get the education and allowances
14:01
to live on in the end between Cline's
14:05
but so senator Dirksen who is sensitive
14:08
to the interest of the big companies
14:10
doesn't this cost money now among other
14:13
things you include the closest severance
14:15
pay and also remove okay we're a
14:19
facilities will move to another town and
14:22
the employees have an opportunity to go
14:25
so that till they will be paid for
14:27
moving to another time I can touching
14:31
your bargaining denied right but that's
14:32
that's not a compactor because when the
14:35
coupling moves of factory now let me
14:37
give you a good example there's been a
14:39
lot of political propaganda circulating
14:43
in Michigan about how the climate
14:45
Michigan because of the Democratic
14:47
administration than the in the
14:49
governor's office is creating an
14:51
unfavorable protocol climate than the
14:53
automobile industry are all running away
14:55
and other companies are running out of
14:56
Michigan but that isn't true they're
14:58
moving for reasons quite unrelated to
15:01
politics and the best example is it the
15:04
last decision made by the Chrysler
15:06
Corporation and Chrysler Corporation is
15:08
the last of the big tree who have
15:10
decentralized their operation General
15:13
Motors started out on a more
15:14
decentralized basis Ford was pretty
15:17
compact in Detroit they are
15:18
decentralized since the war and Chrysler
15:21
now is getting around for that sort of
15:23
thing chrysler corporation recently
15:25
announced that they were moving a plat
15:27
from Evansville Indiana to Platts there
15:31
to st. Louis Missouri now in Indiana
15:35
they consider that they get the most
15:36
favorable political climate they got a
15:39
Republican administration they get a
15:41
right-to-work law they get everything
15:43
that the people who represent that point
15:45
of view think constitutes the completely
15:47
favorable climate some industries point
15:49
of view I'm let them move
15:51
I was Indiana into a democratic city in
15:56
a democratic state why because these
15:59
moves have nothing to do with politics
16:01
they are moving there because the
16:04
Evansville clapped is antiquated the
16:06
norm clap is inefficient it's a high top
16:10
unit plant in terms of its physical
16:12
layout its equipment and they're going
16:14
to build a brand new plant in st. Louis
16:15
but they reason they aren't Julia Luke
16:17
lat Evansville is st. Louis is closer to
16:19
the market that platteville service and
16:22
that's why they're moving now when the
16:24
Chrysler Corporation move they will have
16:28
to pay for the cost of moving their
16:30
machinery and all the other things that
16:33
go into the physical plant and we think
16:35
that moving the workers family or
16:38
providing the worker with some cushion
16:40
until he can make a readjustment and get
16:42
relocated himself is a part of the cost
16:45
of doing business just like moving the
16:47
machinery now the Chrysler Corporation
16:49
will have a more modern more efficient
16:52
plants and they will pay for the cost of
16:55
moving the machinery out of the greater
16:57
efficiency out of the greater
16:58
profitability of the new clamp and we
17:01
think we ought to pay for the cost of
17:02
moving the workers out of the same
17:04
greater profitability and greater
17:05
efficiency so this isn't new money this
17:08
isn't going to cost the consumer
17:09
anything I just think that that if
17:13
moving machinery is absorbed with a
17:18
normal cost of doing business that
17:20
moving people also should be that's all
17:23
it is but it won't cost the consumer
17:25
credit unions tell us that it is
17:28
possible to plan automation so that it
17:30
is introduced into the economy in such a
17:33
way that the nation moves forward and no
17:35
wage earner is hurt in the process at
17:37
relatively no additional cost to the
17:40
company but this is hard to believe mr.
17:43
Luthor could you explain exactly how
17:45
this would work out financially
17:47
specifically in this Evansville case for
17:49
example how can you pay severance pay
17:52
without adding to a company's cost well
17:55
I don't like to say this about the
17:57
severance pay the Chrysler the to platts
18:01
of the Chrysler motor car company that
18:03
are now operating this bill
18:04
operating not very silly but they're
18:07
operating in Evansville Indiana that he
18:11
had when they were operating 5,300
18:14
employees the two plants together they
18:17
will turn out more production in the new
18:20
and more efficient plant in st. Louis
18:22
when it's completed two years to now but
18:24
they tell us that there will only employ
18:26
3,500 workers so that there's a
18:28
tremendous economy and that economy that
18:31
will result from the new and more
18:33
efficient flats that reduces the number
18:35
of workers from 5300 to 3,500 with
18:38
greater productivity will more than
18:40
cover all the costs of moving the Platt
18:43
and the severance pay and a transfer
18:46
allowance that we're asking for and
18:47
therefore this is not a cost factor
18:49
because the company will make the move
18:51
and make a profit out of movie well here
18:58
we are back again with our original word
19:00
automation machines that do things and
19:03
make choices without human beings you
19:06
and I and a Senate committee and Walter
19:10
Reuther have had a discussion why
19:12
because it's our common problem if we
19:16
can solve it and make automation our
19:18
servant then we will cross the bridge to
19:21
prosperity and peace and democracy but
19:25
if we fail and automation produces the
19:27
bleak terror of unemployment there will
19:30
be no prosperity no peace no freedom the
19:36
question is what shall we do to succeed
19:38
to tame automation we you Walter Reuther
19:43
the company's the United States Senate
19:48
[Music]
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment