Push Button and People; Transcript.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2GNIYhi8Dw&t=5s



00:00
[Music]
00:47
machines without human being machines
00:51
without human beings that uncanny
00:54
spectacle is automation a foreboding
00:57
frightening word a word to send a
01:00
shudder through a man or a woman or a
01:02
child even in periods of full employment
01:04
when wages are decent jobs are plentiful
01:07
and times are good but during a
01:11
depression or a recession when men and
01:14
women and children seem to be an
01:15
overproduction then automation is a word
01:19
to strike terror and any human heart
01:21
especially if that human heart beats in
01:24
a wage earners breast now people know in
01:27
a general way what automation means 150
01:33
years ago the world went through
01:35
something called the Industrial
01:36
Revolution we found out how to build
01:39
machines that could perform much of the
01:41
mechanical work men and women used to do
01:45
machines replace the muscles in our
01:47
backs and arms and legs but you still
01:50
needed human beings to direct the
01:52
machines to do the thinking to do the
01:54
brain work but now automation provides
01:57
machines that do the brain work that
01:59
makes the decisions men and women used
02:01
to make in the factories electric I
02:04
limit switches tapes punch cards
02:08
servomechanism everybody knows that but
02:12
what does this mechanical brain was a
02:15
mechanical muscle do to people to jobs
02:18
to the way we live will whatever happens
02:22
happen automatically can we do anything
02:27
well not long ago UAW President Walter
02:31
Reuther was in Washington DC there the
02:35
members of a senatorial committee asked
02:37
him these very questions so now let's go
02:40
to Washington and Walter Reuther here is
02:43
mr. Ruger and here is the senatorial
02:46
committee how does automation look when
02:50
you see it in the plan
02:52
what happens when automation comes to a
02:55
plan let's let senator languor of North
02:58
Dakota ask the question senator Langer
03:01
mr. Luthor hey that these a big
03:04
corporations 47 million two hundred
03:07
million dollars into autumn movie
03:10
automotive machinery whatever it may be
03:14
how many men do that without a word well
03:18
hard give you an exact figure these are
03:21
some of the things we'd like to know
03:22
more about we do know we do know that we
03:26
have thought the impact of automation I
03:29
work first time I went to work in the
03:31
automotive industry was back in nineteen
03:32
twenty seven in February they were
03:35
making the last Model T Ford under
03:37
langer and you know all about a Model T
03:40
because up in your country they were
03:42
very handy back to the days when the
03:44
roads weren't very good there any
03:46
politics to drive right I wouldn't be
03:49
surprised as they were I think God I
03:52
Senate language bill poet my campaign to
03:54
the Model T on that sir anyway when I
03:57
went to work at forward to 1927 this was
04:00
before we had automation 2,000 workers
04:04
on individual machines the make and
04:06
model tianjin which is a relatively
04:08
simple piece of mechanism I mean they
04:10
board each cylinder separately and they
04:12
did all the other things on separate
04:14
operation 1951 the ford motor company
04:18
opened up a new engine plant in
04:20
cleveland ohio adjacent to the Municipal
04:23
Airport it was the first fully automated
04:26
engine plant they take a rough casting
04:30
or a v8 engine which is a very complex
04:32
piece of mechanism comparable model t
04:34
engine block they bring it from the
04:36
foundry and feed it into this automated
04:38
machining line completely automatic and
04:42
without a workers hand touching that
04:44
engine block 14 and six tenths minutes
04:47
later it's fully machined I went through
04:50
that plant many years back to me people
04:53
who were showing me around said to me I
04:55
couldn't already see the workers because
04:57
they're just a few here and a few there
04:58
electric paddles red and green lights
05:00
going on that shows whether the machine
05:02
was operating to standard when all the
05:04
green lights were on it meant that every
05:06
to a battery of machines was operating
05:09
to performance meeting these precise
05:11
tolerances of the machining operation
05:13
when a amber light came on the machine
05:16
was still operating that this was a
05:18
signal as the tool in station number 82
05:21
was becoming fatigue the workers got a
05:23
replacement tool walked over in front of
05:25
82 when the red light went on a machine
05:27
stops put the new tool in the green
05:29
light came on she went on without a
05:31
workers hand touching that 14 and six
05:33
tenths minutes later it was fully
05:35
machines so they said to me aren't you
05:37
worried about how you're going to
05:39
collect union dues from all these
05:40
machines I said you know the thought
05:43
never occurred to me what I'm worried
05:45
about is how you're going to sell ford
05:46
cars all these machines you know you can
05:49
automate the production of automobiles
05:50
but consumers are still made thank God
05:53
in the old-fashioned way this is our car
05:56
trouble this is our trouble Model T to
06:01
experimental model electronic flash from
06:05
muscle and blood to the automated engine
06:08
line mr. ruther tell us what has this
06:11
meant economically to the automobile
06:13
industry if you take some overall
06:16
figures which I think indicates what's
06:18
happening in terms of productivity in
06:21
1947 the industry made four million
06:23
seven hundred and ninety eight thousand
06:26
cars and try and we had a workforce in
06:29
1947 or six hundred and forty eight
06:32
thousand eight hundred workers in 1957
06:36
ten years later we made seven million
06:38
two hundred and twenty thousand cars and
06:40
trucks with a workforce of six hundred
06:42
and fifty two thousand workers in other
06:45
words in those ten years we had an
06:46
increase in the total production of cars
06:49
of fifty point five percent without an
06:52
increase of one half of one percent in
06:54
the labor force so that if you take the
06:57
level of production in 47 and the level
07:00
of production in 57 and the level of
07:02
employment in 47 the level of
07:04
apartment in 57 you find this production
07:07
when a 50 point five percent
07:10
unemployment and went up only one half
07:13
of one percent what Walter Reuther is
07:15
saying is that American companies in the
07:17
last 11 years have bought and built 385
07:21
billion dollars worth of new factories
07:23
and new equipment much of it automated
07:26
equipment in the auto industry alone the
07:30
big three have invested seven billion
07:32
two hundred million dollars in modern
07:34
automated facilities and the result has
07:38
been unemployment like this unemployment
07:42
like these unemployed General Motors
07:44
workers there they are here we are
07:49
people wanting jobs meeting jobs and
07:53
there are the new factories modern as
07:57
all get-out but closed down tight since
08:01
this is the way things have worked out
08:03
mr. Luthor you oppose all this expansion
08:06
we don't adjust to that expansion in our
08:09
productive capacity because we know the
08:11
workers that I represent they're grown
08:15
people they know that there are no
08:16
economic static losses that you can't
08:19
get something for nothing that you can
08:20
only have higher living standards and
08:22
more the good things of life only as you
08:25
create the economic wealth by the
08:28
application of human labor and human
08:30
intelligence to the tools of economic
08:33
abundance and the economic resources
08:35
that we have access to so they say fine
08:38
we've got a bigger plant capacity we've
08:40
got more modern and more productive
08:42
tools but they say if we aren't using
08:45
these tools and we've got idle capacity
08:48
and unemployment then why and the answer
08:51
is we are using our productive capacity
08:55
because we haven't got the purchasing
08:57
power in the hands of millions of
08:59
families necessary to translate you will
09:03
need into demand on the store colors of
09:06
America and that's why we're in trouble
09:09
we're in trouble Walter Reuther says in
09:12
a sense these machines can only do
09:14
almost everything a human being can
09:17
too but not everything machines don't
09:20
buy automobiles for example and that
09:23
means unemployment all right since this
09:26
is the situation is the UAW opposed to
09:29
automation many people at least have
09:32
been told that unions opposed
09:34
technological advances mr. Luthor what
09:37
about that I been very sad when i hear a
09:42
labor spokesman elegant improved
09:45
technology you know King Canute couldn't
09:48
stop the flow of the tide and labor kept
09:51
at the slowest technology labor option
09:54
welcome technology you haven't gotten
09:56
off half lift on automation I shall see
09:58
that you get them because we have we
10:01
have been standing on the house stop
10:03
saying give us the best automation you
10:05
can bring in give us the most productive
10:07
truth because we know it's the only way
10:11
we can have more is to make more and the
10:13
only way you can make more to have more
10:14
productive cold we have been leading the
10:17
parade for automation we want automation
10:20
we want the peaceful use of the atom
10:23
because only as we apply human labor
10:28
whether it be with hand or with brain to
10:31
the tools of production can we create
10:35
the economic well that we want to share
10:37
this is a general motors contract we
10:40
signed in 1955 on page 66 section 100
10:46
reads as follows this is all of our
10:48
agreement my signatures at the end of
10:50
this agreement it reads as follows and I
10:52
quote the annual improvement factor
10:55
provided herein recognizes that a
10:58
continuing improvement in the standards
11:00
of living of employees depends upon
11:02
technological progress better tools
11:05
methods processes and equipment and
11:08
cooperative attitude on the part of all
11:10
parties and such progress if further
11:13
recognize it further recognizes a
11:15
principle that to produce more with the
11:17
same amount of human effort is a sound
11:19
economic and social objective we want
11:23
the best tools the general motors can
11:25
buy we want the most productive
11:28
Automation machinery that the General
11:30
Motors and Ford and Chrysler can create
11:32
in cooperation with machine tool
11:34
industry on this there is no argument we
11:38
know we can have more only if the truth
11:41
of production create more and we want
11:44
the most productive tools available let
11:47
us suppose that we have no ottoman
11:49
automation no multiple drills no huge
11:54
prefers to the subframes what in your
11:58
judgment would be the cause to learn or
12:00
no automobile today compared with the
12:03
price that is actually a change in the
12:05
market if we did not have the tools of
12:09
mass production and economic abundant
12:11
person it would be no automobile
12:13
industry it will be a few pull around by
12:16
hand and only a few fellows who were
12:18
millionaire support car owners would
12:20
have them there just be a handful and
12:22
the roads would still be muddy and so
12:24
forth we all know that but why do we
12:26
make progress we make progress because
12:29
management wants to drive ahead they
12:31
want to make more money they want to get
12:33
more the things that they want but
12:35
workers when they drive for higher wages
12:37
why is it in a country whether where you
12:41
have wages why is it that their
12:44
rate of technology is always floor
12:46
because when manpower is cheaper than
12:48
machines nobody gets the machine but
12:51
when you raise wages and its cost more
12:54
to have men power machines you invest in
12:57
technology and the drive for higher
13:00
wages is perhaps the most powerful
13:03
motivation that accelerate technological
13:05
progress on one thing Walter Reuther and
13:08
President Eisenhower are agreed
13:10
Automation by itself is not good or bad
13:13
it is like a knife or high explosive it
13:17
can be used to advance the well-being of
13:20
people then it is good or it can be used
13:24
to produce dark hopeless tragedy and
13:26
then it is evil but the question is how
13:31
do you tame automation how do you make
13:34
it serve people the uaw says when men or
13:39
women are laid off because of autumn
13:41
asian when the plant moves people should
13:44
be given new jobs if there are not new
13:47
jobs they should be given moving
13:49
allowances to places where there are
13:51
jobs if they need training they should
13:54
get training if they have to be
13:57
re-educated for new jobs then they
13:59
should get the education and allowances
14:01
to live on in the end between Cline's
14:05
but so senator Dirksen who is sensitive
14:08
to the interest of the big companies
14:10
doesn't this cost money now among other
14:13
things you include the closest severance
14:15
pay and also remove okay we're a
14:19
facilities will move to another town and
14:22
the employees have an opportunity to go
14:25
so that till they will be paid for
14:27
moving to another time I can touching
14:31
your bargaining denied right but that's
14:32
that's not a compactor because when the
14:35
coupling moves of factory now let me
14:37
give you a good example there's been a
14:39
lot of political propaganda circulating
14:43
in Michigan about how the climate
14:45
Michigan because of the Democratic
14:47
administration than the in the
14:49
governor's office is creating an
14:51
unfavorable protocol climate than the
14:53
automobile industry are all running away
14:55
and other companies are running out of
14:56
Michigan but that isn't true they're
14:58
moving for reasons quite unrelated to
15:01
politics and the best example is it the
15:04
last decision made by the Chrysler
15:06
Corporation and Chrysler Corporation is
15:08
the last of the big tree who have
15:10
decentralized their operation General
15:13
Motors started out on a more
15:14
decentralized basis Ford was pretty
15:17
compact in Detroit they are
15:18
decentralized since the war and Chrysler
15:21
now is getting around for that sort of
15:23
thing chrysler corporation recently
15:25
announced that they were moving a plat
15:27
from Evansville Indiana to Platts there
15:31
to st. Louis Missouri now in Indiana
15:35
they consider that they get the most
15:36
favorable political climate they got a
15:39
Republican administration they get a
15:41
right-to-work law they get everything
15:43
that the people who represent that point
15:45
of view think constitutes the completely
15:47
favorable climate some industries point
15:49
of view I'm let them move
15:51
I was Indiana into a democratic city in
15:56
a democratic state why because these
15:59
moves have nothing to do with politics
16:01
they are moving there because the
16:04
Evansville clapped is antiquated the
16:06
norm clap is inefficient it's a high top
16:10
unit plant in terms of its physical
16:12
layout its equipment and they're going
16:14
to build a brand new plant in st. Louis
16:15
but they reason they aren't Julia Luke
16:17
lat Evansville is st. Louis is closer to
16:19
the market that platteville service and
16:22
that's why they're moving now when the
16:24
Chrysler Corporation move they will have
16:28
to pay for the cost of moving their
16:30
machinery and all the other things that
16:33
go into the physical plant and we think
16:35
that moving the workers family or
16:38
providing the worker with some cushion
16:40
until he can make a readjustment and get
16:42
relocated himself is a part of the cost
16:45
of doing business just like moving the
16:47
machinery now the Chrysler Corporation
16:49
will have a more modern more efficient
16:52
plants and they will pay for the cost of
16:55
moving the machinery out of the greater
16:57
efficiency out of the greater
16:58
profitability of the new clamp and we
17:01
think we ought to pay for the cost of
17:02
moving the workers out of the same
17:04
greater profitability and greater
17:05
efficiency so this isn't new money this
17:08
isn't going to cost the consumer
17:09
anything I just think that that if
17:13
moving machinery is absorbed with a
17:18
normal cost of doing business that
17:20
moving people also should be that's all
17:23
it is but it won't cost the consumer
17:25
credit unions tell us that it is
17:28
possible to plan automation so that it
17:30
is introduced into the economy in such a
17:33
way that the nation moves forward and no
17:35
wage earner is hurt in the process at
17:37
relatively no additional cost to the
17:40
company but this is hard to believe mr.
17:43
Luthor could you explain exactly how
17:45
this would work out financially
17:47
specifically in this Evansville case for
17:49
example how can you pay severance pay
17:52
without adding to a company's cost well
17:55
I don't like to say this about the
17:57
severance pay the Chrysler the to platts
18:01
of the Chrysler motor car company that
18:03
are now operating this bill
18:04
operating not very silly but they're
18:07
operating in Evansville Indiana that he
18:11
had when they were operating 5,300
18:14
employees the two plants together they
18:17
will turn out more production in the new
18:20
and more efficient plant in st. Louis
18:22
when it's completed two years to now but
18:24
they tell us that there will only employ
18:26
3,500 workers so that there's a
18:28
tremendous economy and that economy that
18:31
will result from the new and more
18:33
efficient flats that reduces the number
18:35
of workers from 5300 to 3,500 with
18:38
greater productivity will more than
18:40
cover all the costs of moving the Platt
18:43
and the severance pay and a transfer
18:46
allowance that we're asking for and
18:47
therefore this is not a cost factor
18:49
because the company will make the move
18:51
and make a profit out of movie well here
18:58
we are back again with our original word
19:00
automation machines that do things and
19:03
make choices without human beings you
19:06
and I and a Senate committee and Walter
19:10
Reuther have had a discussion why
19:12
because it's our common problem if we
19:16
can solve it and make automation our
19:18
servant then we will cross the bridge to
19:21
prosperity and peace and democracy but
19:25
if we fail and automation produces the
19:27
bleak terror of unemployment there will
19:30
be no prosperity no peace no freedom the
19:36
question is what shall we do to succeed
19:38
to tame automation we you Walter Reuther
19:43
the company's the United States Senate
19:48
[Music]

Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?