IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) — A Republican lawmaker and a man later charged with participating in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot were among thousands of people who chastised Iowa’s attorney general for refusing to seek to overturn Donald Trump’s election loss, records show.

 IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) — A Republican lawmaker and a man later charged with participating in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot were among thousands of people who chastised Iowa’s attorney general for refusing to seek to overturn Donald Trump’s election loss, records show.

Droves of Trump supporters who wrongly believed the election was stolen due to fraud called Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller a coward, stupid, blind, lazy, pathetic, and worse in angry emails to his office. Several vowed to defeat the Democrat if he runs for reelection in 2022. Others wrongly believed he was a Republican and called him a traitor.

ADVERTISEMENT

More than 2,500 emails to Miller, obtained by The Associated Press under the open records law, illustrate how authorities at all levels of government came under intense pressure from Trump’s biggest supporters to subvert the election results.

“YOU indeed do have your head up your (asterisk)(asterisk)(asterisk) in NOT acknowledging that there was blatant FRAUD that happened. It’s proven and if you want to take a blind eye I have NO RESPECT WHATSOEVER FOR YOU!!” a person who identified herself as Debbie Wade wrote to Miller.

Others called him “an enemy of the people,” “an incompetent scumbag,” and a “baby killing Democrat.”

“You may not be interested in war, but war is most certainly interested in you,” one warned.

Miller, the nation’s longest-serving attorney general with four decades in office, was a bit player in the election aftermath. His role was to consider whether Iowa should support or oppose a Texas lawsuit asking the U.S. Supreme Court to throw out the election results in four swing states that Joe Biden won.

Trump carried Iowa’s six electoral votes, winning 52.8% of the vote. Trump backers began writing to and calling Miller’s office demanding that he join the Texas lawsuit almost immediately after it was filed.

“It was pretty amazing, the reaction to this, how quickly it came and how it continued,” Miller spokesman Lynn Hicks said.

He said the office was inundated with thousands of calls with comments ranging from respectful to rude and threatening, and that the crush of calls disrupted their ability to help people with other concerns.

Trump supporters erupted in anger when Miller announced Dec. 10 that Iowa would not back the lawsuit because the elections were “fairly and safely conducted.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I cannot support a lawsuit that seeks to invalidate the votes of millions of Americans,” Miller said.

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds indicated that she would have preferred Iowa to support the Texas lawsuit and she denied Miller’s request to have Iowa join a brief asking the Supreme Court to uphold the results in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia. The Supreme Court quickly declined to hear the case.

Among those writing to Miller were Cedar Rapids resident Leo Kelly, who has acknowledged that he spent several minutes in the Senate chamber after joining the pro-Trump mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol last month and delayed the ratification of Biden’s victory.

“It is cowardly to ride the fence — make a decision,” Kelly wrote to Miller on Dec. 10.

After Miller’s office told Kelly that Iowa would not support the Texas case, Kelly responded twice.

“What process did you use to determine that the elections were fairly and safely conducted by election officials of both parties?” Kelly asked. “You seemed quite confident in the way you stated that ‘fact,’ surely you did something to verify it.”

Kelly, 35, is charged with knowingly entering a restricted building, violent entry with intent to disrupt the orderly conduct of official business and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. He has been released from custody pending a court hearing next month.

State Sen. Ken Rozenboom, R-Oskaloosa, said his constituents were upset that Miller’s response expressed faith in the integrity of the U.S. election system. He said they weren’t interested in Miller’s belief but rather the “truth” about the election, asking Miller to reconsider joining the case.

Rozenboom wrote that the outcome was suspect because Biden won more than 81 million votes despite sitting “in his basement virtually throughout the entire election cycle.”

“Does that make any sense at all?” asked Rozenboom, who was easily reelected to a four-year term in November. “The integrity of future elections is at stake, and our republic cannot survive what may be massive voter fraud.”


Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?