Deuteronomy 15 as a litmus test of good modern economics: In Psalms 111, we see the promise to Israel of a homeland is fulfilled. It was not just land belonging to others but a land once made home by Abraham, Isaac and Jacob(Israel). Yet, this is not permission to presume God has given you the right to take property and land belonging to others. Abraham left his ancestral land and ended up immediately within the gates of Egypt as a guest and benefactor of a Pharaoh. Israel today was not just any land but the land of Abraham's people and before Moses left Egypt, some other tribes occupied the promised land temporarily in Jacob's absence. Click here for more.

Deuteronomy 15 as a litmus test of good modern economics:   In Psalms 111, we see the promise to Israel of a homeland is fulfilled. It was not just land belonging to others but a land once made home by Abraham, Isaac and Jacob(Israel). Yet, this is not permission to presume God has given you the right to take property and land belonging to others.  Abraham left his ancestral land and ended up immediately within the gates of Egypt as a guest and benefactor of a Pharaoh.   Israel today was not just any land but the land of Abraham's people and before Moses left Egypt, some other tribes occupied the promised land temporarily in Jacob's absence.  As such, it would be anathema for Israel to just claim other people's land today. The purpose of Israel is to witness about the ten commandments.


-Ten commandments-

The ten commandments confirm that we honor our neighbours and what belongs to them; including their land. We see in history that for sometime Israel, as a political entity, no longer existed.

-Historical fact as recorded in the bible-

We see the historical fact of Israel's occupation confirmed in the bible. See Hezekiah and the Assyrians.

See the occupation of Israel by the Romans  in the first century A.D.

See the story of Nehemiah.

There is no doubt that Israel was to exist and left Egypt as a people with great abundance.  See Deuteronomy 15.   As the Egyptians blessed them when the time of Israel's labor in Egypt ended, the Egyptians blessed them in honor of a principle.  Also, see 2 Chronicles 31 where Hezekiah effected a minimum income support for all citizens of Israel with equal provision.  This was his way of ensuring the well being of all citizens as farming and markets became organised, thereby reducing the amount of work involved and the number of workers required. 

-Hebrew is a rich language-
 Hebrew is a rich language.   The OHCHR is a rich nation's economic strategy as they make Arrangements to work with Canada and the United States to benefit from Automation and a vast existing infrastructure in need of investment, a vital domestic  market and modernisation.

Warren A. Lyon.  

Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?