Could Cristobal Columbus have been the first Democratic politician when, in his imagination, he turned the position of being the heir to the kingdom into a contest when he thought he should be considered as a worthy candidate and that, he alone, was worthy as a ship captain explorer? But when he was not made king or little league baseball captain , he wanted to ask if it was because he did not work hard enough or if he was overlooked and then he wanted to see what the king looked like if maybe it was because Cristobal was not big enough; if it had something to do with appearance when his work was lauded and rewarded and should have been enough. In the end, his unchastened ego with insufficient schooling in anything other than his trade and the lack of chastising of character through social board games made him become a Cleptomaniac and a real pirate but not of chattel only but a Clepto of honor; any honor and any appreciation belonging to others. His daughter, the Marie Antoinette lookalike , is the honored Pallatine (Google Pallatine) who says she needs to be the only king, only authority and the only lawyer. It may be hard to believe but her son was asked what he was willing to give to be the King and he made an offer that brought his life to an end. This is the mystery of our faith. So, if you told him something that would improve a ship rudder, he would have said he wished he was a grade 12 trigonometry high school graduate and that he would have thought of the improvement himself. With your suggestion, you might end up dead and then he would put in a lookalike. But, politics has to involve some quality and genuineness instead of someone confirming with a game his ancestral mission by putting personal physical acceptance in a contest with his tangible observable policies and measurable compliance to domestic and international law on issues such as water quality, health policy, religious freedoms, and universal minimum income support from day to day. But, if you need attention as a modern day Fascist from Canada, you would challenge international law and domestic law. The Quebec vote banning religious symbols challenges Canadian national laws on the issue of religious tolerance. It is a Charter of Rights and Freedoms violation and a Human Rights violation. It will cost the country millions in tribunal judgements. Yet, Quebec honors domestic and international law concerning universal minimum income support. Much of English Canada does not comply. The UDHR article 25 and OHCHR Article 11 is Rule of law and Rule of Law is not something you can pick and choose. Yet, now we are experiencing something completely different. The majority of North Americans do not enjoy or have the guranteed and ensured rights where the population in Quebec (all citizens of Quebec) and Vermont are exceptions. Is it a kind of protest? Instead of starving ourselves and our economy in protest, we can confirm our association and acceptance as citizens of the world. It is the law. It is also logical in the age of industrial automation and the robotification of labour. There really is only one issue going forward for all Americans socio-economically and that is a universal minimum income support while there is a lot of distraction causing the leader of a Free North America to tread water and defend himself all day before he could have a moment to stop bandaging his ego and just hear the trillion dollar foreign debt holders who want you to comply with a guranteed universal minimum income support for all North Americans regardless of complexion primarily for economic reasons since the machine does the work and the but you need the Burger and sushi loving American to buy the vehicle ideally although you could borrow people from Asia or from Iraq who already have an guranteed minimum income support. They would prefer that you honor the value of your own human life and read some Promises of God from Isaiah in Arabic as seen on the Koran or similar promises from the Buddha but pigs are raised to die; like North Americans. The irony is the etymology of North American food culture confirms this. The word "Maize" is an Amerindian word for "people." These Maize people confirmed their name as "Maize" to Cabot who met them in April of 1570 and who was mercifully eaten by them in October 1570 when Winter came and it was time to go south but they, the 12 Europeans, were very small people and it seems after praying for them, the Maize were at peace to eat them. The other option was to bury them and hope you endure and it is how others may have been helped who were willing to hear but who could not migrate south with them. Cabot did not hear. This is what your leaders' reluctance to implement a universal minimum income support discloses. What do you think? Anyway, It is his job as Commander In Chief to hear what they, the foreign power, has to say about any person in the world the foreign power took time to address with a phone call since "foreign power" does not mean they are an enemy. It does mot matter if they called during an election. He has a duty. They could be a fellow member of the United Nations. If a foreign government calls you as POTUS with information about political opponents, you would probably want the person to keep talking and hear everything. The FBI is immediately involved. The line is tapped. A call to the FBI is unnecessary and the White House with its Secret Service has its own investigative powers. You should hear Everything they have to say and of there is any value to the information, it will be determined. Maybe they called to say your opponent is a nice guy who is praying at the statue of Christ in Brazil or Poland! You don't call the FBI You call the Secret Service and they will log the matter and escalate to the Pentagon.
Could Cristobal Columbus have been the first Democratic politician when, in his imagination, he turned the position of being the heir to the kingdom into a contest when he thought he should be considered as a worthy candidate and that, he alone, was worthy as a ship captain explorer? But when he was not made king or little league baseball captain , he wanted to ask if it was because he did not work hard enough or if he was overlooked and then he wanted to see what the king looked like if maybe it was because Cristobal was not big enough; if it had something to do with appearance when his work was lauded and rewarded and should have been enough. In the end, his unchastened ego with insufficient schooling in anything other than his trade and the lack of chastising of character through social board games made him become a Cleptomaniac and a real pirate but not of chattel only but a Clepto of honor; any honor and any appreciation belonging to others. His daughter, the Marie Antoinette lookalike , is the honored Pallatine (Google Pallatine) who says she needs to be the only king, only authority and the only lawyer. It may be hard to believe but her son was asked what he was willing to give to be the King and he made an offer that brought his life to an end. This is the mystery of our faith. So, if you told him something that would improve a ship rudder, he would have said he wished he was a grade 12 trigonometry high school graduate and that he would have thought of the improvement himself. With your suggestion, you might end up dead and then he would put in a lookalike. But, politics has to involve some quality and genuineness instead of someone confirming with a game his ancestral mission by putting personal physical acceptance in a contest with his tangible observable policies and measurable compliance to domestic and international law on issues such as water quality, health policy, religious freedoms, and universal minimum income support from day to day. But, if you need attention as a modern day Fascist from Canada, you would challenge international law and domestic law. The Quebec vote banning religious symbols challenges Canadian national laws on the issue of religious tolerance. It is a Charter of Rights and Freedoms violation and a Human Rights violation. It will cost the country millions in tribunal judgements. Yet, Quebec honors domestic and international law concerning universal minimum income support. Much of English Canada does not comply. The UDHR article 25 and OHCHR Article 11 is Rule of law and Rule of Law is not something you can pick and choose. Yet, now we are experiencing something completely different. The majority of North Americans do not enjoy or have the guranteed and ensured rights where the population in Quebec (all citizens of Quebec) and Vermont are exceptions. Is it a kind of protest? Instead of starving ourselves and our economy in protest, we can confirm our association and acceptance as citizens of the world. It is the law. It is also logical in the age of industrial automation and the robotification of labour. There really is only one issue going forward for all Americans socio-economically and that is a universal minimum income support while there is a lot of distraction causing the leader of a Free North America to tread water and defend himself all day before he could have a moment to stop bandaging his ego and just hear the trillion dollar foreign debt holders who want you to comply with a guranteed universal minimum income support for all North Americans regardless of complexion primarily for economic reasons since the machine does the work and the but you need the Burger and sushi loving American to buy the vehicle ideally although you could borrow people from Asia or from Iraq who already have an guranteed minimum income support. They would prefer that you honor the value of your own human life and read some Promises of God from Isaiah in Arabic as seen on the Koran or similar promises from the Buddha but pigs are raised to die; like North Americans. The irony is the etymology of North American food culture confirms this. The word "Maize" is an Amerindian word for "people." These Maize people confirmed their name as "Maize" to Cabot who met them in April of 1570 and who was mercifully eaten by them in October 1570 when Winter came and it was time to go south but they, the 12 Europeans, were very small people and it seems after praying for them, the Maize were at peace to eat them. The other option was to bury them and hope you endure and it is how others may have been helped who were willing to hear but who could not migrate south with them. Cabot did not hear. This is what your leaders' reluctance to implement a universal minimum income support discloses. What do you think? Anyway, It is his job as Commander In Chief to hear what they, the foreign power, has to say about any person in the world the foreign power took time to address with a phone call since "foreign power" does not mean they are an enemy. It does mot matter if they called during an election. He has a duty. They could be a fellow member of the United Nations. If a foreign government calls you as POTUS with information about political opponents, you would probably want the person to keep talking and hear everything. The FBI is immediately involved. The line is tapped. A call to the FBI is unnecessary and the White House with its Secret Service has its own investigative powers. You should hear Everything they have to say and of there is any value to the information, it will be determined. Maybe they called to say your opponent is a nice guy who is praying at the statue of Christ in Brazil or Poland! You don't call the FBI You call the Secret Service and they will log the matter and escalate to the Pentagon.
Comments
Post a Comment