Rule of Law. FSJ News and Rule of Law Report January 6th, 2025. The US is the ultimate Narco state US influence in Latin America with the White Anglicised Latino coming home so to speak dates back to the 1800's. It's not a bad thing. In the case of Venezuela, post WW2 involvement in Venezuela is seen in the 1950's. The attitude on income support in the US economy is a cull on the economy itself. Maybe we thought that the US economy is more electrified than any other economy in the world with all transactions being very possibly an electronic transaction that is quickly accounted for and taxable for that essential sales tax earning. The British economy earns more in sales tax. The Irish economy earns more in sales tax than the US. South Africa earns more in sales tax. In the economies mentioned above, the sales tax and also the income support are requisitely sacredly enforced national tenets of defensive economic policy. They rely on their own people to finance consumer activity; not well financed people from other economies as some do who have no settled identity of their own; a bad habit that we find originated in Jamaica and that we find no where else except in the US and Canada where essential benefit policies are not followed unusually but interrupted. The US uses smaller western and Latin nations as a scape goat for their problems. The US is dishonest. The US economy is smaller in national tax earnings although it's a relatively large electrified, networked territory and this decoys the issues when everything is always on sale and always on discount as one of the most lowly funded peoples on the planet; they argue and the Virago and sometimes a national leader comes forward who could not confess any more honestly about that bad habit of not finding value in his own people as the requisite people but invites all the world to come. Then he threatens them as if they are not documented residents or citizens; he is a cost that is just tremendous as he asks us to do nothing else but pretend with him; the easy requisites that are as simple as watering the lawn are not resolved; as simple as adding an extra 4 cents a minute to Maine and Rhode Island's benefit or ensuring This is done across the country if the state is not already paying at least $70,000.00 USD per year. Yet all the fast shopping and fast food activity decoys the issue. The issue is that there is no enough "Consumer Money" in the lives of the average North American. We will call it requisite Consumer Money instead of income support benefit since the job is less certain during automation and AI and the money is really provided to enable purposeful requisite economically necessary Consumer activity. The US earns less in national sales tax than France or Zimbabwe, less than China or India. This is because they do not collect a national sales tax on consumer transactions. This is clean, easy money; not market closing and economy retarding tariffs. The fear is their irresponsibility with the resources globally, their failure to finance their economy to ensure the absorption of manufacturing and their tendency towards purposeless foreign campaigns for militaristic expression of US hegemony. Dark economies emerge based on drug trades apparently and the US is in denial. The evidence of guilt is their failure to comply with UN regulations as affecting the quality of human life. They are the White Latino drug lord...a Pinochet so to speak and some US leaders are worse than others. Money is provided somehow for drug dealing but not Consumer Money. We don't need any racist Latino, using Latin America as a footstool to confirm his new white social arrival. That is evil; done.

 Rule of Law. 


FSJ News  and Rule of Law Report


January 6th, 2025.

The US is the ultimate Narco state


US influence in Latin America with the White Anglicised Latino coming home so to speak dates back to the 1800's. It's not a bad thing. In the case of Venezuela, post WW2 involvement in Venezuela is seen in the 1950's. The attitude on income support in the US economy is a cull on the economy itself. Maybe we thought that the US economy is more electrified than any other economy in the world with all transactions being very possibly an electronic transaction that is quickly accounted  for and taxable for that essential sales tax earning.  The British economy earns more in sales tax. The Irish economy earns more in sales tax than the US.

South Africa earns more in sales tax. In the economies mentioned above, the sales tax and also the income support are requisitely sacredly enforced national tenets of defensive economic policy. They rely on their own people to finance consumer activity; not well financed people from other economies as some do who have no settled identity of their own; a bad habit that we find originated in Jamaica and that we find no where else except in the US and Canada where essential benefit policies are not followed unusually but interrupted. The US uses smaller western and Latin nations as a scape goat for their problems.

The US is dishonest. The US economy is smaller in national tax earnings although it's a relatively large electrified, networked territory and this decoys the issues when everything is always on sale and always on discount as one of the most lowly funded peoples on the planet; they argue and the Virago and sometimes a national leader comes forward who could not confess any more honestly about that bad habit of not finding value in his own people as the requisite people but invites all the world to come. Then he threatens them as if they are not documented residents or citizens; he is a cost that is just tremendous as he asks us to do nothing else but pretend with him; the easy requisites that are as simple as watering the lawn are not resolved; as simple as adding an extra 4 cents a minute to Maine and Rhode Island's benefit or ensuring This is done across the country if the state is not already paying at least $70,000.00 USD per year. Yet all the fast shopping and fast food activity decoys the issue. The issue is that there is no enough "Consumer Money" in the lives of the average North American. We will call it requisite Consumer Money instead of income support benefit since the job is less certain during automation and AI and the money is really provided to enable purposeful requisite economically necessary Consumer activity.

The US earns less in national sales tax than France or Zimbabwe, less than China or India. This is because they do not collect a national sales tax on consumer transactions.  This is clean, easy money; not market closing and economy retarding tariffs. The fear is their irresponsibility with the resources globally, their failure  to finance their economy to ensure the absorption of manufacturing and their tendency towards  purposeless foreign campaigns for militaristic expression of US hegemony.   Dark economies emerge based on drug trades apparently and the US is in denial. The evidence of guilt is their failure to comply with UN regulations as affecting the quality of human life. They are the White Latino drug lord...a Pinochet so to speak and some US leaders are worse than others. Money is provided somehow for drug dealing but not Consumer Money. We don't need any racist Latino, using Latin America as a footstool to confirm his new white social arrival. That is evil; done.

 This perspective is a central theme in "dependency theory" and "critical geopolitics." It argues that while Latin American countries are often labeled "narco-states," the U.S. serves as the ultimate engine and beneficiary of the global drug trade; the ultimate engineer and culprit.  

The argument that the U.S. is a "drug-dealing state" beyond the scale of Latin American counterparts typically rests on three pillars: Demand/Capital, Institutional Complicity, and Weaponry.

1. The Engine of Capital (The "Market" Argument)

Critics argue that the U.S. provides the essential component for any "dealing" operation: the money.

 * The World's Largest Customer: The U.S. remains the largest consumer market for illicit drugs. From an economic standpoint, the "dealer" isn't just the person selling on the corner, but the entity that creates and sustains the demand.

 * Laundering and Liquidity: A significant portion of drug profits is laundered through the U.S. financial system and real estate. Critics argue that Wall Street and major U.S. banks have historically benefited from the "black liquidity" of drug money, especially during financial crises.

2. Historical Institutional Complicity

This argument points to times when U.S. agencies allegedly protected traffickers to serve higher political goals—something Latin American leaders have long pointed to as hypocrisy.

 * Geopolitical Trading: During the 1980s (Iran-Contra), the U.S. was accused of allowing cocaine trafficking to fund anti-communist rebels. Latin American critics argue this is worse than a "narco-state" because the U.S. used drugs as a tool of statecraft rather than just a source of personal corruption.

 * The "Double Standard": While the U.S. "certifies" or "decertifies" Latin American countries based on their drug-fighting efforts, critics note that the U.S. rarely faces international consequences for its own internal distribution networks or its role in the global financial side of the trade.

3. The "Iron River" of Firearms

Latin American officials often argue they are the "battlefield" for a war funded and armed by the U.S.

 * The Flow of Guns: Most of the high-powered weaponry used by cartels in Mexico and Central America originates in the U.S. In this view, the U.S. "deals" the tools of violence that allow the drug trade to function, effectively exporting the bloodshed while importing the product.

Comparison: U.S. vs. Latin American "Narco-States"


Feature

Traditional "Narco-State" (e.g., historical Panama, Bolivia)

The "Drug-Dealing State" Argument (U.S.)

Role

Production and Transit

Consumption, Financing, and Arming

Corruption

Direct bribery of local officials/police

Systemic integration into the financial/banking sector

Tool of State

Survival of the regime/elite

Used for foreign policy (historical) and economic stimulus

Consequences

State failure, civil war

High incarceration rates, "Iron River" of guns south

Most Americans are essentially White Latinos with anglicised names after all the wars but  the US is also the ultimate Narco state. This is being interrupted by Interpol. But based on US rationale of jurisdiction, the US leaders could be apprehended for these narco crimes as White Latinos. 

Recent Developments (2025–2026)

As of early 2026, this debate has intensified due to U.S. military strikes against drug vessels in the Caribbean and the high-profile capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. While the U.S. frames these as "national security" actions against narco-terrorism, many regional analysts see it as a continuation of a policy where the U.S. uses the drug war as a pretext for regime change, further complicating the "who is the dealer?" narrative.

We will take a closer at the "Iron River" (the flow of U.S. guns into Latin America) or the financial laundering cases involving major U.S. banks.


Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?