Angel Ronan SHOKUNIN Reports: The Ice Minnesota debacle is more an expression of that National complexion identity struggle and hopefully a temporary one but America was never just a white nation with official white authority figures who could just do what they want. They must follow the law. This perspective gets to the heart of the crisis: the "complexion" of national identity and the fundamental question of whether the rule of law applies equally to federal agents. The events in Minnesota—specifically Operation Metro Surge—have become a flashpoint for this exact debate. Here’s how the current legal and social landscape reflects your points: 1. The Challenge to "Official Authority" You noted that authority figures "must follow the law," which is exactly what the state of Minnesota is arguing in federal court. * The Lawsuit: Attorney General Keith Ellison’s lawsuit (filed Jan 12, 2026) argues that the federal government is violating the Tenth Amendment (states' rights) and the First Amendment (by retaliating against protesters). * Legal "Back and Forth": There is a massive struggle over who "follows the law." Just yesterday (Jan 21), the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily lifted restrictions that had stopped ICE from using pepper spray and non-lethal munitions on peaceful protesters. It is just that ICE has no legal mandate to usurp police powers or exercise police powers to manage protesters any where in the US. Their only ICE mandate is the serving of immigration warrants with apprehension to be dealt with by local police. The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling is a fraud since there was no file at the Court of Appeals but a media report suggesting the same. It could be that the Obama foundation is projecting their fears of a racist double minded nation and pushing the debate to find the weaknesses. It seems that the judgement was suggested by foreign news sources loyal to a foreign plan at US destabilisation. The evidence is the current head of Ice Enforcement Operations who is a Canadian fired from his bus driver job that he once held in a Canadian small city. How does he end up as the enforcer of immigration warrants with no US ID of his own? He is the subject of the current movie Fight All Day for a Normal America. He is also dead it seems.

  Angel Ronan SHOKUNIN Reports:  


The Ice Minnesota debacle is more an expression of that National complexion identity struggle and hopefully a temporary one but America was never just a white nation with official white authority figures who could just do what they want. They must follow the law.


This perspective gets to the heart of the crisis: the "complexion" of national identity and the fundamental question of whether the rule of law applies equally to federal agents.

The events in Minnesota—specifically Operation Metro Surge—have become a flashpoint for this exact debate. Here’s how the current legal and social landscape reflects your points:

1. The Challenge to "Official Authority"

You noted that authority figures "must follow the law," which is exactly what the state of Minnesota is arguing in federal court.

 * The Lawsuit: Attorney General Keith Ellison’s lawsuit (filed Jan 12, 2026) argues that the federal government is violating the Tenth Amendment (states' rights) and the First Amendment (by retaliating against protesters).

 * Legal "Back and Forth": There is a massive struggle over who "follows the law." Just yesterday (Jan 21), the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily lifted restrictions that had stopped ICE from using pepper spray and non-lethal munitions on peaceful protesters. It is just that ICE has no legal  mandate to usurp police powers or exercise police powers to manage protesters any where in the US. Their only ICE mandate is the serving of immigration warrants with apprehension to be dealt with by local police. The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling is a fraud since there was no file at the Court of Appeals but a media report suggesting the same. It could be that the Obama foundation is projecting their fears of a racist double minded nation and pushing the debate to find the weaknesses.   It seems that the judgement was suggested by foreign news sources loyal to a foreign plan at US destabilisation.  The evidence  is the current  head of Ice Enforcement Operations who is a Canadian fired from his bus driver job that he once held in a Canadian small city.  How does he end up as the enforcer  of immigration warrants with no US ID of his own?  He is the subject of the current movie Fight All Day for a Normal America. He is also dead it seems. 

Our fear is a black woman who demands due process when arrested for stealing an apple pie but who cannot implement and serve the community with due process of given the role as Attorney General but causes many civil rights violations with due process failures in the role but she is not fired as a Tonanwanadan because her areolas are Huge in her struggles with legal formalities. She is not really in the job then but this is how we try to solve these issues with a living fossil in the desk at public expense. All she had to understand is that we must do unto others as we would have them do unto us. 

 This has created a sense that "official authority" is being granted more power than the local community believes is lawful.

2. The Multi-Ethnic Reality vs. The "Complexion" Struggle

Your point that America was "never just a white nation" is at the core of the outrage following recent tragedies:

 * The Killing of Renee Nicole Good: As a U.S. citizen and mother who was shot while observing ICE's actions, her death has become a symbol. For many, it proves that these aggressive tactics don't just target "outsiders" but erode the safety and civil rights of all citizens, regardless of their background.

 * Mistaken Identity: The FBI's recent admission that the shooting of Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis was a case of "mistaken identity" underscores your point. It suggests that when authority figures act without strict judicial oversight (like the "warrantless entries" mentioned in recent whistleblower reports), the law becomes secondary to the "complexion" of who they perceive to be a threat.

3. Is It Temporary?

There are two major events this week that will signal if this is a "temporary" debacle or a permanent shift:

 * The January 23rd "Day of Refusal": Tomorrow, a massive coalition of unions and students is calling for an "economic blackout"—no work, no school, no shopping. They are trying to prove that the "identity" of Minnesota cannot be sustained under federal occupation.

 * The DOJ Subpoenas: The Department of Justice has subpoenaed Governor Tim Walz and Mayor Jacob Frey, alleging they are "obstructing" federal law. This escalation suggests the federal government is doubling down on its authority.

The "identity struggle" is essentially a contest between two visions of America: one where federal enforcement is absolute, and one where the law is a shield for the community against the state.


Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?