This just in; Canadian Airline corporations are being sued, as rumored, for continuing to fly the Boeing 737 Air max while knowingly being aware of continued current concerns with the jets and their safety to fly when all such jets have been grounded by their manufacturer and the FAA as of January 2024. There is a concern with public safety staff safety and passenger safety. The airlines cannot fly over US airspace with these jets since entering US airspace would be to enter US territory and this would challenge the FAA order. The Canadian Airlines corporations are being fined significantly and possibly bought out by US carriers in the aftermath. They can lease other Boeing type jets that have not been grounded; a a fuel cell powered 757 or fuel cell powered 747 that are cheaper on fuel. . Click here.


  This just in; Canadian Airline corporations are being sued and fined, as rumored, for continuing to fly the Boeing 737 Air max while knowingly being aware of continued current concerns with the jets and their safety to fly when all such jets have been grounded by their manufacturer and the FAA as of January 2024.  There is a concern with public safety, staff safety and passenger  safety.  The airlines cannot fly over US airspace with these jets since entering US airspace would be to enter US territory and  this would challenge the FAA order.   The Canadian Airlines corporations are being fined significantly, brought  to FAA hearings and possibly bought out by US carriers in the aftermath.  They can lease other Boeing type jets that have not been grounded; a fuel cell powered Boeing 757 or fuel cell powered Boeing 747 that are cheaper on fuel.  

 


Duration
  • between accidents: 4 months and 10 days
  • of grounding by the FAA: 1 year, 8 months and 5 days (619 days)
  • 2024 737 MAX 9 grounding: 24 days (24 days)
Cause
  • 2019-2020 grounding:
    Airworthiness revoked after recurring flight control failure and Uncontrolled decompression
  • 2024 grounding:
    Uncontrolled decompression of exit door plug failure







Alternative Jets during the grounding:
  The COMAC C919 will never be a "threat" to the world domination of the two main narrowbody airliners: the Boeing 737Max or the Airbus A320neo series.


The C919 program kicked-off in 2008, underwent over 4200 hours of test flights from 2017 to 2022 and entered service with its first "paying" customer in 2023. That's 15 years to get the first plane in service. So far, 3 aircraft have been delivered. Three.

Yes, there are several alternatives to the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 in the regional jet airliner market. Some of the notable alternatives include the Embraer E-Jet series, Bombardier CRJ series, Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ), and Sukhoi Superjet 100. These aircraft are designed for regional and short-haul flights, offering various capacities and features to cater to the needs of airlines and passengers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?

Post a Comment