There IS a solution. There IS a solution to the "19 crimes" provoked genetic grouping's response to robotic automation. They should not be wound down in desperation to show us their old pirate, artful dodger and cannibal ways. The economy has its own Maslow hierarchy of needs. ---- The economy suffers as Robotic automation can cause a downturn or what we call a recession. A bomb that goes "boom!!!!!" can cause a recession also, shutting down the whole market temporarily. But, commitment reopens it. We can talk about downturn expectations. But, markets are to be wielded and controlled. The question is how do you provoke a "boom!!!!!!" in preventing a recession? How do you provoke a recession? As robotic automation can provoke a recession by reducing spending power per citizen on average so that market activity slows down, shuts down, then you input $20000.00 per citizen to ensure spending power and market activity stays constant, goes up and Explodes!!!! It closed the gap between supply and demand. The issue is that we love robots. They save time. ********************** However, Robotic automation does two things at the same time. It pushes up supply and closes down demand, lessening,flattening demand. The minimum income support works in closing the gap between the variable of demand and the variable of supply. We know the supply provided by robotic automation will not change. We are not destroying the machines we just fancied at GM with our trillion tax dollar loan to GM amortized over the next 400 years. We put money into demand in the form of a universal minimum income support when robotic automation takes money from the human's usual opportunity for Labor. Take a ginseng and increase your demand as demand in your citizenry's financial, economic blood causes the market to stimulate and then the whole thing goes up and then you have a boom!!!!!! Blow the market horn....beeeeeep!!!! ---- In explaining an economy's Maslow Hierarchy of needs, the first priority is ensuring the well being and dignity of the people. This is achieved by ensuring what is set out in Article 25 of the UDHR. It is understood as a universal unconditional minimum income support to be paid to each citizen. The Society that does not concur finds itself in constant challenges with the residual truths of human nature rising to a level of civil war commented on by Hobbes. See the conclusion to his book Leviathan; a tremendous testament to what circular emotions and arguments can plague a society provided with a linear principle that essentially boils down to giving every human being in the group no reason to want my shoes and my tires or my family. You should not want my family. Robert E. Lee a.k.a Nat Turner is a known pirate and rebel who pitted the laws of peace,order and good community against his resentment of servitude and ownership. He would tell the Plantation foreman that he offered more, would give him more if he would just help Lee in taking the owner. This is a model followed in political ascension today in America but if Lee wins, he usually would kill the person to whom he made the promise since you can't trust a guy like that and it could kill the Ford factory some day when people offer to write off six months of payments before Ford would use its power of influence in Washington to provoke a "Boom!!!!!!!!!!!!" baby. The farm hands and others would help so that Robert E. Lee would be him; the only begotten son and owner in his game, see his authority. He would try to also impeach, set up the son and owner to ensure that there was faux immoral majority. Yet, God so moved the world that whoever would believe in His laws and commandments would have life and life more abundantly. These 19 or more principles of civilization that include principles from Egypt confronted Europe once; including the people and lands known as Germany today. Robert E. Lee created Nat Turner as an alias to blame his sins of piracy and home invasion on Christians; not just Black people. Lee was born in 1773 in the West Indies as a Turner. He was a ship captain by 12 years old at six foot tall and kicked and killed many English Ship Captains. He was eventually captured and used by elements unknown to destabilise the South and keep the U.S. divided, unstable. The key issue was to ensure that America would not be too English. His resentment as a team leader is against that English leadership in order and civility but there is nothing wrong with table cloths, fine tables and civility. He decided in 1944 that he could vent his resentment for English in private; in movies maybe or cartoons, rather, while America is not white but "American" and Americans must have the universal minimum income support and quiet community. Was it good for you? Can you remember what Stan said; what he did? If you trespass beyond that boundary of mutual respect and civility, we are at civil war. It should never happen while there are laws to ensure against it. --- Money is spent by the community to provide protection against crimes that are committed even when dignity for all is ensured in our evident human nature. ------ Clean water and sanitation of shared spaces is also essential in this Maslow hierarchy of government needs. But, the expenditure on people comes first in this hierarchy. The Monarch, King or Queen appearing on the coin or paper currency has sent out an edict or ordinance confirming the priority of needs. What is your intention? Have you complied in your region, state or province?

There IS a solution.  There IS a solution to the  "19 crimes" provoked genetic grouping's response to robotic automation. They should not be wound down in desperation to show us their old pirate, artful dodger and cannibal ways. The economy has its own Maslow hierarchy of needs.
----
The economy suffers as Robotic automation can cause a downturn or what we call a recession. A bomb that goes "boom!!!!!" can cause a recession also, shutting down the whole market temporarily. But, commitment reopens it.    We can talk about downturn expectations.  But, markets are to be wielded and controlled.  The question is how do you provoke a "boom!!!!!!" in preventing a recession? How do you provoke a recession?  As robotic automation can provoke a recession by reducing spending power per citizen on average so that market activity slows down,  shuts down, then you input $20000.00 per citizen to ensure spending power and market activity stays constant, goes up and Explodes!!!! It closed the gap between supply and demand.  The issue is that we love robots.  They save time.
  **********************

However,  Robotic automation does two things
 at the same time. It pushes up supply and closes down demand, lessening,flattening demand.  The minimum income support works in closing the gap between the variable of demand and the variable of supply.    We know the supply provided by robotic automation will not change. We are not destroying the machines we just fancied at GM with our trillion tax dollar loan to GM amortized over the next 400 years.  We put money into demand in the form of a universal minimum income support when robotic automation takes money from the human's usual opportunity for Labor. Take a ginseng and increase your demand as demand in your citizenry's financial, economic blood causes the market to stimulate and then the whole thing  goes up and then you have a boom!!!!!! Blow the market  horn....beeeeeep!!!!
----


 In explaining an economy's Maslow Hierarchy of needs, the first priority is ensuring the well being and dignity of the people. This is achieved by ensuring what is set out in Article 25 of the UDHR.  It is understood as a universal unconditional minimum income support to be paid to each citizen.   The Society that does not concur finds itself in constant challenges with the residual truths of human nature rising to a level of civil war commented on by Hobbes.  See the conclusion to his book Leviathan; a tremendous testament to what circular emotions and arguments can plague a society provided with a linear principle that essentially boils down to giving every human being in the group no reason to want my shoes and my tires or my family.  You should not want my family. Robert E. Lee a.k.a Nat Turner is  a known pirate and rebel who pitted the laws of peace,order and good community against his resentment of servitude and ownership. He would tell the Plantation foreman that he offered more, would give him more  if he would just help Lee in taking the owner.  This is a model followed in political ascension today in America but if Lee wins, he usually would kill the person to whom he made the promise since you can't trust a guy like that and it could kill the Ford factory some day when people offer to write off six months of payments before Ford would use its power of influence in Washington to provoke a "Boom!!!!!!!!!!!!" baby. The farm hands and others would help so that Robert E. Lee would be him; the only begotten son and owner in his game, see his authority. He would try to also impeach, set up the son and owner to ensure that there was faux immoral majority.    Yet, God so moved the world that whoever would believe in His laws and commandments would have life and life more abundantly. These 19  or more  principles of civilization that include principles from Egypt confronted Europe once; including the people and lands known as Germany today.  Robert E. Lee created Nat Turner as an alias to blame his sins of piracy and home invasion on Christians; not just Black people.  Lee was born in 1773 in the West Indies as a Turner.   He was a ship captain by 12 years old at six foot tall and kicked and killed many English Ship Captains.  He was eventually captured  and used by elements unknown to destabilise the South and keep the U.S. divided, unstable.  The key issue was to ensure that America would not be too English.  His resentment as a team leader is against that English leadership in order and civility but there is nothing wrong with table cloths, fine tables and civility.  He decided in 1944  that he could vent his resentment for English in private; in movies maybe or cartoons, rather,  while America is not white but "American"  and Americans must have the universal minimum income support and quiet community.  Was it good for you?  Can you remember what Stan  said; what he did?


If you trespass beyond that boundary of mutual  respect and civility, we are at civil war.  It should never happen while there are laws to ensure against it.
---
Money is spent by the community to provide protection against crimes that are committed even when dignity for all is ensured in our evident human nature.
------

Clean water and sanitation of shared spaces is also essential in this Maslow hierarchy of government needs.

But, the expenditure on people comes first in this hierarchy.
    The Monarch, King or Queen appearing on the coin or paper currency has sent out an edict or ordinance confirming the priority of needs.  What is your intention?  Have you complied in your region, state or province?



    Comments

    Popular Posts

    By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?