The consumer on a treadmill; the wheel represents consumer activity, sales and sales tax generation. We give him back a fraction of the money and human wage energy we save in automation. It might be 10 cents a minute paid every minute 365 days per year and we see this is about $6.00 an hour and he is paid this in his consumer work 24 hours per day, 365 days per year to maintain the economy. We can lever up by an extra penny a minute ( worth about an extra $5000 per year) if we see his consumer power is growing dim or low next to the average price or prices for goods. It's a problem. The wild man says he is not sure of what he wants yet and would rather wait for God's invisible hand or he says he knows that without money, he is confident he could survive because he has the cannibal chicanerous ways of a scavenger. So, maybe we reduce the sales tax to zero and then this would have its ramifications like low government revenue or billions in lost revenue. Then you want to say you are saving money as you cancel the income benefit of any new government employee and you expect him to work, pay rent, buy groceries with the job only paying for his daily needs. This affects economic stimulus. We could increase sales tax by 0.5 % and then give the population an extra 3 cents per minute. They have enough to spend more as you wanted and just as energetically, briskly or frequently.

    The consumer on a treadmill;  the wheel represents consumer activity, sales and sales tax generation. We give him back a fraction of the money and human wage energy we save in automation.  It might be 10 cents a minute paid every minute 365 days per year and we see this is about $6.00 an hour and he is paid this in his consumer work 24 hours per day, 365 days per year to maintain the economy.  We can lever up by an extra penny a minute ( worth about an extra $5000 per year) if we see his consumer power is growing dim or low next to the average price or prices for goods.  It's a problem. The wild man says he is not sure  of what he wants yet and would rather wait for God's invisible hand or he says he knows that without money, he is confident  he could survive because he has the cannibal chicanerous ways of a scavenger. So, maybe we reduce the sales tax to zero and then this would have its ramifications like low government revenue or billions in lost revenue. Then you want to say you are saving money as you cancel the income benefit of any new government employee and you expect him to work, pay rent, buy groceries with the job only paying for his daily needs. This affects economic stimulus.


 We could increase sales tax by 0.5 % and then give the population an extra 3 cents per minute.  They have enough to spend more as you wanted and just as energetically, briskly or frequently.  




Comments

Popular Posts

By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. They are experimenting with money in terms of crypto or bit coin and its definition before they would agree to just HAVE MONEY. Money is the most important weapon in spite of all your Oppenheimer detonators that can't read help during peace time and for what when you would still need money?