January 7th, 2024. Income support for all citizens is a normal capitalist economic custom. This Article is based on research by Warren A. Lyon who is a Canada Research Chair in Law and Economics at the Angel Ronan™ Foundation; I have ancestry in that Middle Eastern world myself but I have Egyptian Jewish ancestry since there would be no Jewish nation as we know it without Egypt; and we can all cooperate around the world for a safe community. Without a full and sufficient income support, many of your citizens are not able to integrate into the modern world. They are not financially integrated but segregated with a low and insufficient income support or no income support. We will always have a dependent economy so we may as well enjoy our dependency. Maybe we finally agree that we should ensure the government gives us all a good allowance or income support of $80,000.00 or more; all of us. That is the law and we are kind of segregated economically in the international economy with only $28,000.00 per year as income support. If we don't spend too much, we have money and then we agree that having this money is worth an extra 15% sales tax on consumer items; not fuel or vehicles that will stay taxed around 14%. We could afford to do it now without the extra 15% since we are obligated to do it and the Europeans are paying the bill. We only make debt payments but the debt will be less at 28% sales tax and we will pay more per day. The Europeans actually just take the payment. So, for about 28% sales tax we will have twice the tax revenue. In an automated work world there is less income tax revenue and sales tax becomes more important as a source of national revenue. Could you run an economy in such a way to achieve some anthropological, ancestral or developmental identity or is it to confirm some motive? Written by Warren A. Lyon, (a brownish Eskimo person), Junior Angel Ronan Economist. Click here. There are certain legal formalities that are requisite in modern economic life. A woman set on resistance with an accent from a certain culture might be the most cunning Trojan in a resistance and struggle against those formalities that includes the value of human life. ClIck here.
January 7th, 2024.
Income support for all citizens is a normal capitalist economic custom. This Article is based on research by Warren A. Lyon who is a Canada Research Chair in Law and Economics at the Angel Ronan™ Foundation;
Written by Warren A. Lyon, (a brownish Eskimo person), Junior Angel Ronan Economist.
Click here.
There are certain legal formalities that are requisite in modern economic life. A woman set on resistance with an accent from a certain culture might be the most cunning Trojan in a resistance and struggle against those formalities that includes the value of human life.
Every human life has value; and every residential or industrial property has value. But, when does a State Attorney General have more expertise in valuing a property than the owner of the property or the bank or loan corporation that is in the industry of valuing property responsibly and making or withdrawing or extending loans in their self protective best interests in the daily regular operation of their business? If you were to challenge the valuation, how do you challenge it? What is the valuation date? Is it the date of the application of the loan or the date when the loan is granted? What did you propose is the correct valuation? The State Attorney General cannot even answer that question and should ensure that they are enforcing the law and fighting crimes
when there is a complainant instead of taking bribes and starting investigations to harass their political opponents; opponents of their family's life long political party. According to the internet, the Attorney General is a Democrat and as the case is one of political interference with no complainant and no victim under the Civil or Criminal law, it must be withdrawn as an embarrassing show of one's abuse of discretion.
If you have no complainant, you have no crime If no one under the contract affected by the right or wrong valuation cried foul, then you have no contractual cause for litigation or dispute. You have no legal standing in Court as you are not a party to the contract. Also, its not a public property. Also, if its undervalued or overvalued, who loses and who wins? A reasonable valuation is best for either party. The land alone might have been the source of valuation if the building was being set for demolition or extensive renovation. You leave the consenting parties to maintain their business dealings under the usual course of business especially no one has complained of loss or breach of contract or fraud. Even the Attorney General is estopped from going beyond the corporate vale or editing the binding contract between the parties if, on the face of it, there are grounds to challenge the contract on public or private grounds. This feels like John Adams pretender trying to steal the real John Adams farm and brewery.
Its like she just woke up one morning and said she feels the man should never have had his own property that he might refinance it, and allow the loan company to value it in accordance with usual business practices. The loan company provided their own valuation. Maybe the judgements were written by the Governor of NYY; not a Judge in one of the worst abuse of power cases. But, otherwise, she is a nice lady that can re-task her energies more purposefully and genuinely to help the general population. Has she been feeding her own headlines involving the upcoming election to CNN; headlines about states removing certain Republican candidates from the ballot in places such as Illinois but that has not happened in any case yet does she want it reported this way and why? There is no truth to any of the Donald legal battles. The motive for all of them is political and also extortion. Those behind it are....and look like.....
It would be best that she focuses on the gender based benefit inequality some where, like in New York state maybe and in Ontario also; if she can do it as the inequality offends the Fourteenth amendment. If the transgender in New York are receiving an automatic, guaranteed and ensured $40,000.00 income support from 12 years old paid into their bank account without making any application for such support, then this support, as funded by New York State sales taxes and other taxes collected from all citizens must be paid equally to every citizen in New York State regardless of gender, race, religion or any other form of differentiation. That's the job!! This would be really helpful.
The Equal Protection Clause is located at the end of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment:
Congressman John Bingham of Ohio was the principal framer of the Equal Protection Clause.
The North American economy is an inchoate economy and cannot function as a tiger economy or consistent bull economy. Every economy has a resonance; like music. Maybe some economies sound like the economic death and frustration of previous generations in the face of job cancelling new technologies where some live and some die; some have and some do not where it might have been difficult to see how to solve the economic problems for all. It was not impossible then and nor is it impossible now when we can design submarines, aircraft and economies that defy human doubt. We see that all European economies before WW1 provided for all citizens and most but not all US Eastern seaboard economies provided for all citizens. The decision makers have to know it is possible to run an economy that provides for all citizens. If the economy does not provide for all citizens, why would that be? It is illegal. On the issue of hegemony, we wonder if it is a genetic expression of hegemony to argue with the economic standard of European and Asian economies; an argument only to feel a sense of independence and hegemony over oneself while you also demand the national sovereignty to decide the average quality of life of your population or the inconsistent, low consumer activity in the operation of the economy that you would then try to bandage with national policies that destabilize the national financial system with irresponsibly low interest rates, hoping that people with no money would qualify for low interest loans. It would seem you have used national policy making powers in your demand for national sovereignty but you fail to answer the problem directly as you determine not to take suggestion from European powers or Asian powers. In the argument in the low national revenue, you find yourself unthinkingly seeking the assistance of the European and Asian powers for a loan and loans that negate your effort at hegemony in your arguments with Europe as to whether you must pay all citizens a certain income support and whether you must collect a certain amount of sales tax; and this loss of sovereignty and hegemony transpired in your effort to maintain a kind of independence and hegemony over yourself in your argument with the Europeans who meant you well; when you chose to do it your way.
You are like a man offered a key to unlock your shackles and chains to end your slavery and before you try to hear and accept their help with that key, you refuse them and the keys since you don't know what the key is for or how it works while you prefer, in your cave man understanding, a hack saw that you use to cut through the chain but you also cut your foot off also in the process; making yourself even more dependent as you need even more of their help. This is what you have done economically. In your resistance of solutions from your neighbours and lenders, you are like the man who says he needs to have the sovereignty over his town folk, to kill whomever he wishes in his village. The village becomes a country and does not want you telling him what the law is from Europe. But if you heard what they have to say, you would have more. In the end, you will run outnumbered by those Europeans. You are only fighting yourself and your own life when you do not just accept their advice to save your people in response to an automation economy that affects us all with joblessness that causes moneylessness. We might look the same but we are not the same. We are human and believe in human cooperation. It's not difficult. It's like a dog poop on the side walk. You know it has to be answered. It's like inequality with the income support benefits that is really evil, and unfair when although we are all paying the same sales taxes. If you don't answer the dog poop, it affects us all.
But, if you really wanted to feel hegemony over the Europeans why not take their suggestions and ensure that you pay every American citizen/ every North American citizen one dollar more than the average European every day? If its about boiling an egg, maybe there is really only one way to do it and there is nothing wrong with taking the European suggestion on how to run an economy before there is egg all over you. You would still be in debt to Europe at this time or China and you would still need national revenue to maintain that debt. There is nothing wrong with having more national revenue to achieve this more "save face" objective. Instead, you ask us to pretend with you that you are achieving something in what you are doing at present as you refuse to acknowledge the voters and their right to decide who they will call President. I think you are really from New Brunswick anyway.
In all normal functioning capitalist economies, it is the custom that all citizens have an income support. This would be Ra'ah-conomics. vs. Maroonomics.
This is called Ra'ah-conomics according to Warren A. Lyon based on his research work in economics; as God provides.
Note: The Hebrew verb ra'ah (from which yireh is derived) means "to see." In this case, it is translated as "provide." God sees the past, present, and future. This means that He is able to anticipate what we need and provide it. Yahweh Yireh simply means the
They say Columbus was a maroon in that he was marooned and shipwrecked in Jamaica for many many years and a have /have not experience emerged when they may have hoped to be found by passersby with ships only in hopes of pirating those who have more....more supplies who find them. Eventually you pirate the lives of others. You ask for all their clothing. You ask someone to cut their tires or their boat rudder. You love only to pirate their life and their worth if you think they are more than you. Eventually you pirate colonies. The colony becomes a country and is now stuck in between two socioeconomic cultures, stuck in between two economies; two kinds of human dignity where one is ensured for all citizens. and one is not ensured.
Then, we have pure aboriginals who saw explorers and missionaries hug them and kiss them, feigning family while stealing the worth of the aboriginal and their elders such as the native lands. Now, it seems you can see some 4th or 5th generation aboriginals( called Black or White) express this two faces pattern in their own families with a disregard of the property owner occupier to decide for themselves what they would like to do; for themselves and their people. Not all black or white Anglo aboriginals are involved but there is a loss of the pure aboriginal respect and reverence of the elders as observed in many scenarios after all the genetic milieu between explorers, pirate and the aboriginal. We must keep people safe from any plot or plotting.
In this Maroonomics, there is a socioeconomics that emerges to the present day that says your way of being and doing and existing is worked out subconsciously by all around you to be some where in between the two worlds; the world of the indigenous and the received culture of Europe or Asia just as a maroon on a damaged boat could drift in between two points of land for years. Maybe you legalized the drugs before you fund it; fund the people and the economy that you could afford to buy the drugs in addition to food, clothing, shelter and water. This experience in the blood of the survivors creates an interesting culture of certain human capabilities that keeps itself in a limbo as it may and the pain of the marooned alive. Those in that culture understand each other. The economies of the English exemplify this pattern; a kind of frustration in between the received culture and that cultural expectation and ongoing aboriginal self determination. This might be seen in a road that has potholes and craters too often and you have to keep fixing it instead of a smooth road that never has a pothole for five years or more. It might be a black speaker of the House and a Black President but no Black Lawyers or very few to answer the question in some resistance of system and process but you want position and authority but then you notice you still see black people suffer in the legal system when they have no one to explain their innocence or their legal defenses; if any. You see a black bus driver and cab driver but very few truck drivers; another unusual dichotomy but it is because you have not permitted the black to drive trucks in your mindset or world view.
It might be the bank that credits the customer account with an incoming wire transfer without holding it and being charged "use of funds" by the sending bank. This is a good thing. Maybe it's a local West Indian Law School that teaches the basics with West Indian motifs. Instead of the man on the Clapham Omnibus, it might be the man on the Ocho Rios to Cuba Express.
It might be the man on the Ocho Rios to Cuba Express. It might be that finally every Jamaican has the dignity of an income support of at least $USD 20,000.00.for every citizen in the King's wisdom. Do you pay every citizen? We are sure the music stars from all genres, including reggae, would wish to see us all receive an income support. We would never wish for any child of reggae, regardless of complexion, to go without. Some bellies are full; some are hungry. An unfunded man is a hungry man.
China is the most capitalist economy in the world next to Japan. They have both expanded in their understanding of pure aggressive capitalism and have taken over all the English countries industrially with a simple application of capitalism's principles. The first assured strong domestic markets at home with a sufficient income support for all citizens. They obeyed all of capitalism's discoveries in light of automation. But, what about America as a fledgling economy; fledgling only because its resistance of income support for all citizens at amounts that ensure sufficient consumer stimulus and occupation of one's own economy and urban spaces has caused negative market growth since the problem was identified in the late 1850's during history's first major upswing in the mechanization of or automation of labor. While income support was customary in Europe for centuries as an economic principles taken from ancient Egypt and Rome seen in Prince Joseph's ration in Egypt or seen in the Romans and Jesus telling Herod to render unto the people and unto Caesar, it is more of a rediscovery for the English and the Americans whose dna is combined with North American aboriginality and prone to resist the whole system instead of just enjoying the principles that give effect to community safety, consumer stimulus, strong domestic markets and to the life of the human without the blood and sweat in shyster-ing huckster-ing, hunting and the gathering. In this assimilation of North America to established Economic principles that have Roman and African origin, we discover that North America was like an Africa Junior in some ways but lost in the land of nod after the continental Pangea divide until men from the east came to the western hemisphere; some of them black Africans and some of them were Europeans like Hernán Cortés. There was also Estevanico (c. 1500–1539), also known as Esteban de Dorantes and Estevanico the Moor, was the first person of African descent to explore North America. It looks like he travelled around Jamaica and Cuba and saw the aboriginals who he described as appearing like West Coast Africans; Nigerian or Ghanian.
Estevanico (c. 1500–1539), also known as Esteban de Dorantes and Estevanico the Moor, was the first person of African descent to explore North America. Little is known about his background but contemporary accounts described him as a "negro alárabe" or "Arabic-speaking black man" native to Azemmour, Morocco. In 1522, he was sold as a slave to the Spanish nobleman Andrés Dorantes de Carranza in the Portuguese-controlled Moroccan town of Azemmour.
After automation, how do you have a domestic market with able and willing consumers with money to buy your goods if the citizen and former worker that is now suffering joblessness does not have a job that would provide some reasonable money so, then, he can participate in his central economic purpose as the consumer and buyer of goods; and now without money he is obsolete? But the solution is not to, then, bring foreigners from Asia's overflow of people or Europe's overflow of people because there are horrible social and economic problems that are suffered by the North American in the shameful purview of well funded non Anglo Europeans or non Anglo Asians? Reducing North American taxes is not the solution as it reduces the governments ability to respond to problems. But, the maybe the solution is a purposeful balance; a small provision of income support to every citizen at no less than $300.00 per day and also a small increase in taxes that will also help to stave off concerns about over consumption and wasteful consumption. All goals are achieved and the social and economic problems are averted; like from a well designed truck or car cabin with soo much thoughtfulness and human consideration; so crazy thoughtful....WOW and no North American is dying in front of the well funded foreigners any more who technically own the Capitol Building in every state with the loans we pay to Europe and Asia!!!!
The only way is to give every citizen an income support that amounts to an economic fraction of what you save in human wages. This fraction of money saved can be as small as $6.00 per hour (10 cents per minute) 24 hours per day; 365 days per year to fulfill our purpose to ensure there is sufficient consumer stimulus and buying power on the market for robotically made goods that also fulfill their purpose 24 hours per day. In 1939, 1 cent a minute that works out to $5000.00 per year would have been enough to prevent the ongoing depression. In 1947, 2 cents a minute might have been enough to ensure a peaceful, recession free economy that would have been in parity with the socioeconomic peace and prosperity of Europe.
In 1964, 3 cents a minute might have been enough to save President Kennedy and America that would have provided $15000.00 per year. Seti has sent a decree that all citizens of any country in the world shall have an income support tomorrow of Jo less than 9 cents per minute with an Income support. The sales tax is recommended at 50%.
Sales tax is a tax on human activity. It does not affect the raw cost of goods. It is pure government revenue. It's like a levy for the cost of cleaning at the local public pool. You see it as a levy on your entrance ticket added to the cost of your ticket. The same levy or tax appears on your grocery bill...add to the cost of your expenditure. It might be 13% or 20% but if the government needs to be sure it can afford of it's logical economic obligations, it can raise revenue through sales tax that can effectively be as high as 100% from time to time...to keep the people humble and keep them feeling lime they are suffering under you but also the sales taxe revenue is used to keep the people funded with a reasonable minimum income support of 12 cents/pence per minute. The English will not only be some of the best footballers but also comparatively the most handsomely funded consumers in the world with the most agile socio-economics. This would be GeorgeBest-onomics.
Their government spends less money on the ills that would be caused by moneylessness in any population and more time is spent collecting money on all human consumer activities. They lend you money when you are in debt with your "dog chasing his tail" discussions about all the human problems caused by the moneylessness caused by job automation. While it is obvious how to efficiently and lovingly, self defensively, "basic instinct-ually" solve it, you do not solve it but continue to spend energy embarrassing yourselves on TV just talking about the problems. You talk about people dying and freezing and starving in your economy. Do you pay all citizens an income support? Sze Sze!!
But what does it really matter if the lives of your people do not matter to you?
All the little lessons of capitalism you did not respect eventually add up. You did not have enough consumers as real buyers with real money for too many decades. So, your car company is in debt to the government. The government sold it's car company debt to Asian companies. So, they own you. You still don't have enough consumers as real buyers with real money as you are not respecting that all normal capitalist economies provide an income support to all citizens that is sufficient to cover all human economic necessities on a daily basis.
If income support is accepted as a necessary humanitarian legal requisite by virtue of the UDHR, then it is a legal requisite. If income support is accepted as a necessary aspect of any economy anywhere in the world post 85% Total job automation, it is because the money is necessary to maintain the humane conditions of life. It maintains your population that is also your market; of buyers for the manufactured goods. We accept that money does not come from employment necessarily and nor do we expect people to rely on a job but income support. It is also a simple, "logic" response to automation to keep the supply of goods moving with sales that we also call "bought and sold" measurable, paid demand. It keeps the economy "investive" or certainly in the phase of certain economic growth. A little income support with little yearly increases ensures growth. We are looking 14 cents a minute as that little amount.
A failure to implement an income support for every citizen makes the population uncertain, the market uncertain and growth uncertain and negative especially after significant job automation. Investors in the market look for responses to try and guarantee their return on their investment The key response to ensure that growth is not negative is to provide an income support to the population in that non "investive" region to try and make it "investive." North America is "non investive" because it does not provide an income support to every citizen and in many regions, it is less than $21,000.00 per year. Maybe you provide twice as much to satisfy your anxiety about the region and growth. You want the North American to decide to provide some reasonable amount to ensure demand ; a small fraction of what is saved in production with automation on the supply side of the economy thereby ensuring there is enough of a balance between demand and supply. This fraction of what is invested on the production side and saved in cost may be about 14 cents per minute per citizen; 365 days per year paid to every citizen to ensure supply meets purposefully consumer demand.
But, the North American did not decide to do what was expected. His lack of response as the manager of his own population is like a neighbor that refuses to feed his own dog a few scraps of food from his own fast food plate every day until the dog is emaciated. This is the inhumanity. The response from onlookers who invest in the economy; Asian investors who cannot afford a slowdown in the sale of bread or cereal or popcorn is to send their own people with their income support provided by Asian governments to North America. It's not an easy solution and requires a lot of energy, cost and moving of people but it is the solution arrived at in response to the North American's indecision concerning Income support. The Asian investors decided to cooperate with your self defeatism and ask you to help the newly arriving replacement population with every accommodation. The numbers arriving are very high to achieve the economic goal of ensuring there is no economic slow down and some growth in various sectors when these people arrive with some....Money that is income support money paid to them by their more obedient capitalistic Asian governments who provide their people the little bit of money to ensure liquidity for consumer stimulus. Immigration is therefore an emergency economic solution to North America's chosen moneylessness. If we give every North American twice the amount they are recieving now, then we can rely on immigration half as much as we do currently. We can do both, lots of immigration and doubling North American income support because we evidently enjoy the spicy diversity and will have the money to enjoy and participate in our own economy and not just watch foreigners fly by; pass us by. Again, this cycle is based on a need for money in the average North American consumer. The answer or response needed before the great move of Asian and African immigrants that come with their income support and savings was to provide money, a regular income support and incrementally more income support every year to the North American..every year. This was the answer, the requisite natural response. But, it was not forthcoming from the North American. You should feed your own dog. It wants to eat. Isn't it at least embarrassing according to your neighbours that your dog is starving when you could feed the dog?
Then a denial of income support would be imposition of the cruel and unusual circumstances and conditions of life that would satisfy the definition of genocide.
The denial of income support money is the denial of food, water, shelter and human safety thereby creating conditions of life that satisfy the genocide definition. Why deny this money to any citizens under your international treaty obligations? You pay some citizens but not others based on gender or home address. Those unpaid citizens constitute a target group under the law. Genocide is a crime under Federal US law, UK Law and the Criminal Code of Canada.
Let's Wicked see how.
Canada, the US and England are signatories to the UN Convention on the Prevention of Genocide.
In 1948, the UN signed the “ Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”. Article II states: "Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: (a) murder of members of the group; (b) bring harm to the physical or mental integrity of members of the group; (c) intentional subjection of the group to conditions of existence calculated to bring about its total or partial physical destruction. (d) measures aimed at hindering births within the group. e) forced transfer of children from the group to another group." A group would be any set of people who suffer collectively the imposition of inhumane conditions of life.
The Rutaganda Trial Chamber observed that:
"[...] the concepts of national, ethnical, racial and religious groups have been researched extensively and that, at present, there are no generally and internationally accepted precise definitions thereof. Each of these concepts must be assessed in the light of a particular political, social and cultural context. Moreover, the Chamber notes that for the purposes of applying the Genocide Convention, membership of a group is, in essence, a subjective rather than an objective concept. The victim is perceived by the perpetrator of genocide as belonging to a group slated for destruction. In some instances, the victim may perceive himself/herself as belonging to the said group."[4]
P.1. Evidence of the existence of a "national group".
In the Akayesu case, the Trial Chamber said:
"Based on the Nottebohm decision rendered by the International Court of Justice, the Chamber holds that a national group is defined as a collection of people who are perceived to share a legal bond based on common citizenship, coupled with reciprocity of rights and duties."[5]
We have designed systems of economy that can take back the money as fast as people spend it and if they spend more, they have less and give more back to the government but this is not genocide and those with bad consumption habits will not endure with us for very long while we will make money off of their unruly spending and irresponsible spending ways.
They are just hamsters that spin on the global capitalist economic wheel to produce us some money on what they spend; sales tax money or credit interest. But, if I am the Chinese leader I must have a Chinese Library with mostly Chinese books or if I am an Indian leader, I must have and maintain an Indian library with mostly Indian books to be credible even if I am not really Indian and if I do not want to openly identify myself as having some other nationality and loyalty while the leader or monarch of those people. In fact, If I am an Indian leader, I must have and maintain an Indian population with mostly Indian people with an income support for ALL the people that are citizens under my government to be credible even if I am not really Indian and if I do not want to openly identify myself as having some other nationality, loyalty and a foreign non English, Non Canadian, Non American, Non Human basic hegemony instinct if I have such a condition or symptom while the leader or monarch of those people. The English people are not lousy people.
Could you run an economy in such a way to achieve some anthropological, ancestral or developmental identity or is it to confirm some motive?
But, we will make money on them all and all of their wild spending as provoked by the smart phone networks. We pay in 10 cents per minute 365 days per year and take it back at 40% sales tax. This is good; yea? We pay .010% of the first $EUD 10,000,000.00 sales tax collected every day to the heraldry fund that supports the Monarch personally and all Heritage Trust buildings, museums and galleries. .010% of $EUD 10,000,000.00 is $Eud 100,000.00. We support our governor; and government.
This article is written in our Reflection Series where we use reflections to discover something.
///////////
Comments
Post a Comment