Posts
A new Angel Ronan article will demonstrate that contrary to some law society tribunal jurisprudence adjudicated before a District Court Judge, Section Seven charter rights do have relevant import to the discussion and the jurisprudence if it can be shown that there is a breach of the Law Society rules by state employees , a breach of procedure affecting communication of correspondence and the ability to respond, if there is criminality and deceitfulness or deception by the employee or contempt in the procedural process amounting to a deliberate interruption of someone's section seven Charter rights, affecting their career, their employment and their profession. The deliberate failure in due process during a Law Society hearing, affecting the Section 7 Charter Rights should amount to a withdrawal of the Tribunal matter. This is much like a section 8 or section 10 Charter breach that leads to a withdrawal of a criminal matter. The Law Society cannot gurantee a right to a career in law but an evident breach of the professional rules of conduct by society employees is known to have taken place and there is no absolute authority in the regulation of the legal profession that we should tolerate a breach of the rules by employees. We do not allow Absolute authority in the Church and nor is it tolerated or allowed to be abused by the Catholic Church. It does not exist. Employees of the Law society are not above the law and are accountable for their Illegal, embarrassing actions. They do not have absolute authority. It just cannot be tolerated and nor was it ever tolerated in our current Court and legal system and nor was it tolerated in the Court of Louis the 14th. It is contempt of Court, rendering you worthy of arrest in our current system or banishment to a penal colony in the West Indies or Canada as it may have happened in the history of our jurisprudence.
An Exploratory Referendum is not a mandate. You held a referendum to gauge public opinion and then go into a more responsible fact-finding mission. The Brexit Referendum was not a contract with the British public to leave the EU but a gauge of public opinion to consider the possibility of leaving and go through the cost benefit analysis and consider the facts so you can tell the angry fish monger the truth. There is no cost benefit in leaving the EU. The EU spends more money on the UK than the UK spends on the EU. Europe and MPs collaborating to block Brexit, claims Boris Johnson | ITV...
Automation as the unsympathetic Pacman: A robotic, automation economy needs an unconditional universal minimum income support to function. Let us understand the economy as follows: Workers are paid to walk up and down steps and the energy generated from the human foot pressing down on the energy absorbing step powers a wheel that is part of an early industrial knitting machine. They were paid usd $12.00 per day. The steps were implemented in the earliest subway system in Istanbul. A knitting mill was next door to the subway. The steps were electrified and turned into an escalator with a loan from the government. The wheel is still powered. The knitting continues but with electric energy and a generator to power the wheel. What do you say? Shall we play crochet? The people were no longer needed to walk the steps to power a wheel. They were made redundant in terms of their industrial usefulness. Money is saved on wages but is now spent on paying back a fixed cost loan to the government. The people, however, may die off if the money they need to survive is not provided to them directly or if there is no other alternative work where they may find an income. Alternative work is hard to find when automation becomes pervasive right across the economy. Even the male penis has become automated (automatable) (go to Dildo Canada for more) along with the fast food cashier and order taker. Without alternative work or monies provided directly in the form of a universal minimum income support, you notice that market demand for goods produced also dies off. Transactions between the producer of goods and the consumers dissipate and die off. Market activity slows down. Profits were expected to go up but you made fewer sales in a dying market. The people have no work and no money. There is less activity and no sales. There is no profit. There are insufficient sales. In the aggressive capitalist system followed by Russia, with a universal minimum income support, sales stay consistent while the return on investment goes up. Profit goes up. The rate of transactions stay consistent. Yet, there is less money spent on the hoopla and carnival of consumerism. Also there is no boom and bust cycle but consistent sales and transactions with a universal minimum income support shielding the citizen consumer and market activity from the effect of automation. The government implemented a value added tax on the sale of goods and organised a loan payment for the companies who automated with robotification that is three times the amortised payment over 25 years but also in total only a 1/6 of what is saved on wages when human labor was made redundant by the escalator and other forms of electrified automation. The company has a 75 percent total saving on cost but no ROI yet as the people still have....no money. The government puts money automatically into people's bank accounts. It works out to be 1/4 of the workers former wages. The GM worker used to earn usd 120,000.00 per year but 1/4 of his wage amounts to Usd 40,000.00 and he can still pay his mortgage or rent. Dignity is maintained. There is ROI for the industrial company and more profit. The escalator is full of happy citizens who are consumers and society is maintained as a vibrant enterprise. This is a game of simple understanding but it is the first time in history where the human worker's continued viability is not based on his muscle or dexterity but his own appreciation of his own socio-economic value as the citizen and consumer with your entitlement not only to free health care but a wage supplement called the unconditional universal minimum income support. Your understanding and self appreciation should not be taken advantage of to the determinant of entire towns, states and regions like Braddock, Pennsylvania and all of Ohio..and now also Western New York or Ontario. But, your understanding and self appreciation is necessary to ensure your demand and request for what you are legally entitled to receive according to the rules and this demand must be met with a demand for an apprehension of the rule breakers who have refused to provide this universal minimum income support supplement to the citizens for the mutual security benefit and safety legislation of all citizens as their former elected position or job required them to provide it. This makes Brexit a distractive uncertainty, distractive like a 20 year old from Guyana in a GCSe or grade 12 class taking her top off in school and hoping to get negative unruly attention and if you don't chastise her, she says she has authority. Then she steals your wallet when called to come outside of the class to speak to the principal about something. She becomes a politician and finds a way to recreate that same topless polemic in your economy. Without understanding your value as a consumer on the economy, you are in the pacman human value board game. Industrial Automation is the pacman. The blue dot is a suffocating human without universal minimum income support. You need a minimum income support wage supplement to shield you from the pacman of automation. Brexit is a bad idea in light of the lack of leadership from the English on universal minimum income support. There is a lack of commitment. It is simply a great smog of uncertainty that some hobbit may wish to use to dance around the obvious obligation to fund and pay a universal minimum income support as he covets (escovitch) the small calculated amount of cash involved to fulfill the universal minimum income support and fulfil the economy; that is keep the economic wheels of activity and transactions turning so, you have transactional income generation hopefully leading to a profit...and so you have a Return on investment. Instead, he brings great conflict. His population dies off slowly in conditions that involve their economic underfunding and the resultant lock stock and two smoking barrels of . economic desperation. Then, he relies on Asian tourism involving 100+ million Asians washing through his economy; Asians who have an Asian universal minimum income support to keep economic activity going. But, to avoid the great conflict, you need to enforce the rule of your existing social order with all the police authority required to end what is a criminal action affecting commonwealth citizens primarily and also citizens under the security management of Norad as well as Nato in addition to the EU and the UN. See the UN ILO Regulations R202. It is rather simple actually. We already have a global conflict in this and only the Anglo can decide whether he is subject to some planned obsolescence for his people and his linguistic grouping. Over time, a population that was willing to sacrifice health, fertility and longevity for social acceptance( as they need to be accepted) with the monies spent on cigarettes are in a calculation that now questions not only their understanding of reproductive capability and intention vs. Social acceptance but economic viability. The leaders of the Anglo people are either unable to understand the widget of human value that materialises as a universal minimum income support or they don't. The evidence is that the leadership of the Anglo peoples have understood academically in theory but not in practice and the evidence is in several centers of the North American economy while gleaming new coffin condo towers with Zyclon B gas fixtures possibly for the rich and famous disguise what is really happening as based on a misunderstanding of the human value widget unapplied to the economy and its peoples. The end result is an unofficial but slow and sure economic genocide with the disappearance of the Anglo North American who needed to see his authority and who is being replaced by other, newer populations with the universal minimum income support. The church steeple could not wait and nor can the continued human enterprise; hallelujah...salam..sze sze! The non-application of a universal minimum income support to fulfil the human value economic widget stands against the political posterity or ego of politicians who may plead ignorance and this is the evidence of their alleged good speech writers but even ignorance vs. the suffering and the denigration of the population and its slow genocide asks who was really managing policy all along with the evidence of the required policy on every university library shelf across the entire region. The widget when applied will bring growth again to the economy and fill the empty spaces. Either you understand the human value widget that materialises in the form of a universal minimum income support or you don't but if you don't there is only the economic genocide, the economic suffocation of the population as each family, each individual is a blue dot or blue men in the face of an incoming yellow Pacman of industrial automation eating the blue dots as the non-yellow, unshielded individuals. If you were yellow, then you have nothing to worry about. Yellow governments respect the necessity of the universal minimum income support in maintaining the human variable in the all- important consumer market, ensuring a Return On investment or ROI. Relying on 100's of millions of Asian tourists or Afghan tourists with universal minimum income support is a band-aid solution and a very unsympathetic market apology artificially maintaining activity in Anglo markets. It is a dependency that is causing a vacuous, dangerous instability.
The one key observation about the English is that they have been doused with authority. The accent is authoritative. They have made notable contributions to literary history and several contributions to the history of science in Europe. But, the issue is that Charles the 1st was afraid that graduates from Universities may have become Royal by virtue of their degrees and alumni status; a crazy idea! He eventually disappeared on route back to Scotland from the West Indies and was replaced by a pretender. Graduates are not royal. Certainly, there is no member of the establishment today who would be concerned about that. But, do you really think leaving the EU will help you find your soul and know what you really want? However, leaving the EU is like Israel leaving itself. The only explanation behind a European culture wanting to leave the European Union is when the current captain of that culture has insufficient faith in its identity to finish the programme; to stay in that League as if it fears not being European enough or being able to enjoy its mutual authority with other nations and cultures. This is instead of hoping foolishly to be a great and terrible authority all on its own. It is almost as if a selfish clautrophobe is running the English world in a manner contrary to written requisite policy. Maybe he or she is the descendant of a family that was on the wrong end of a land deal of some kind. He or she does not want to hear anything about "people"but they want to just have attention and express their authority over people and the economy to destructive ends. If the person in control is innately black or white vs. African or European and the victims are people of any background, you see the particular problem is the failure to facilitate the economy and a lack of understanding on how to do it with an unconditional universal minimum income support or if you do understand, there is an agenda reverberated that involves a lack of commitment to the citizenry and their very lives under the OHCHR and the UN ILO Recommendations R202. The point under the UDHR article 25 gurantee is to facilitate immediate emergency independence. The Russian, Asian and European approach along with the Republic of Ireland is sufficient cash availability to every citizen. You can stay in a hotel or rent a middle market apartment anywhere in most cities. This lack of commitment confirms the criminal intent to commit genocide. See 18 U.S. Code § 1091. Article 4 which says (4) Genocide subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part. The UDHR and the OHCHR pursuant to the UN ILO Regulations R202 are set out to ensure the physical protection of the group. See the definitions, paragraph 5 that state a national group such as American or Canadian satisfies the definition of a group that may be targeted by conditions of life causing the destruction of that group. Article 5 in the definitions state that (5) the term “national group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of nationality or national origins. How is the quality of water? What is the amount of universal minimum income support you receive in your state? To tell people, they are ungrateful if they should remind anyone of the legal landscape is to say that the uncertainty caused by the lack of commitment in North AMERICA OR THE UK OR SOME OTHER 2ND WORLD ANGLO NATION IS NOT GENOCIDE IF THE LACK OF COMMITMENT IS MANIFESTED in those non-3rd world Anglo nations; that such uncertainty caused by a lack of legal commitment to the UN ILO Regulations R202 could not be a crime if the failure takes place in an Anglo jurisdiction in North AMERICA. This is hardly a legal defence to the lack of legal commitment and the conditions of life individuals are expected to endure. $20000.00 per citizen per annum is a legal defence and evident commitment but Much less than other nations whose populations are taking up the space created by the lack of funding in the case of Anglo North Americans. Maybe Cain and his children ( see Roberto Reicho) are bringing his own people to America. The lack of commitment is evidence of an intent to create conditions of life that fail to satisfy the OHCHR. This is genocide. See the legal definition. It discloses a violence in the minds of the leadership whose only casual defence is to say it is not so bad and if you don't like it, you can go back to where you came from but who says this to people who did not come from any where else? THE MACHISMO AND DEFIANT INTONATIONS GIVE US A NATIONALISTIC PATERNALISTIC SENSE OF IDENTITY AND COVERING THAT GOES RIGHT TO THE BONE OF A HALF AMERINDIAN POPULATION THAT IS STILL TRYING TO COALESCE AN IDENTITY UNFORTUNATELY AND CHILDISHLY IN JUXTAPOSITION OR OPPOSITION TO ANOTHER AUTHORITY. IT WAS ENGLAND IN 1776. It is the UN today whose headquarters is ironically in New York with the US demonstrating a half hearted leadership role as the alleged leader of the free world that doles the blessing of UN treaties to other nations where the people thrive with an ensured $60-70000.00 in minimum income support even before they drive a taxi or get paid as a restaurant manager. This US enforcement takes place at the threat of the gun point to the benefit of non-English populations but the US starves its own population at home as well as its English allies. The multi-generational English speaking population dies off and then the foreign non-English population comes in. Any of them are Muslim. They also have several senators in the House of Representatives who speak Arabic first; English second. Can you simply enforce the universal minimum income support for the English populations since we all sin and fall short of the glory of God; Shalom, Salaam, Amen!! Any man or woman who insists on being black or white is a coastal North African, according to theories, and the descendant of the biblical figure known as Cain who slew his own relative as he needed to be accepted; accepted by God. Even God tells you what to do or you read a manual like the ten commandments or the UDHR, you keep doing your own thing to see if the authority will come, the end of the world or if God himself will come. The thief on the cross was Cain and had been been crucified several times but evaded death. He may have been on a cross beside Jesus. This Cain dna arrived in the new world from the old world on ships sent by Christopher Columbus. Could it be that every judgement secured successfully by a law firm called Angel Ronan(TM) is the reason for the systemic interruption? Is it that the firm did not let anyone down? Do you want to buy Angel Ronan? It's a free market. Make a phone call and work out a deal. There is some system interruption taking place. But, who would tolerate it? No matter how big Russia is or Japan is territorially, you see that China, Japan and Russia comply with the economic principles distilled by Adam Smith and conveniently reiterated in the OHCHR and the UN ILO Recommendations R202. Maintaining human rights is cheaper than human rights violations. Would being English provide you sufficient immunity to kill a Canadian, maybe steal his international intellectual property in a global economy? No. But, it certainly sounds and looks English. It wears Union Jack socks. It hopes that a divorce means that no one has authority over them to tell them what to do, to dictate policy, to tell them how to do anything and that maybe they will find their own way again and discover what it is to be English and your own man again. But, how will you know what it is to be English and a man again without the pressure of the responsibility that a relationship with your key market places on you to grow, to pick up your cross, deny yourself and put your ego behind your back as you sell billions of dollars in beer if nothing else, demonstrating leadership by example in human rights and also leadership in economics by turning your North American and West Indian nations into powerful income generators with a 20/20 plan; A minimum $20000.00 in universal minimum income support($60,000.00 per year is ideal) and a 20 percent sales tax? You don't need the pound to say who you are and nor do you need an independent car company. The Belgians and Norwegians do not have any independent car company. Warren De Bohun.
If you were truly native and had the power, wouldnt you implement the universal minimum income support? If you were truly English or European, wouldnt you implement the universal minimum income support? But, you seem paralysed with no logical momentum going forward except for threats to abandon legal responsibility with arguments about austerity but there is no question of the austere in funding refugees before you fund your own people at rates comparable to Asia. You also threaten to abandon every other rule imposed upon you if it means, as it seems, clean water in England as well as Papua New Guinea or that black people will have not only universal health care but an unconditional universal minimum income support whether or not they are fortunate to find an enjoy the honor of a job. At a guranteed universal minimum income support of $30000.00 EU/pounds per year maybe the Black will be happy to be a consumer and a witness of your White Anglo virtue; maybe sell some West Indian food and tropical fruits, run a pound shop or run a day care maybe or just go to law school and know your entitlements. Tell the less educated but Kingly positioned whites that " It is written" and say to them "...is it not your law you teacher of England if not Israel lest we forget Gethsemane?" But, who do you think you could be to teach them anything before the bridge and their economies falls down? Travel around with your $30000.00 per year. Learn French and Spanish maybe. Learn Turkish or Greek. I don't know. You get the point. Some people are very anxious about social position and authority. Many ethnic groups are thriving in the UK and have stayed out of that anxiety with their universal minimum income support from where ever they come from. Did you see the man from Shenzhen selling pot pies on Black Stock Road and also fish and chips? Will it be a chicken shish or a lamb shish? You noticed the Islamification and Asianization of your High Street that, 20 years ago, was more ethnically diversified with more Anglo owned businesses. The universal minimum income support allows for more constructive systemic and institutionalised racialization to the benefit of an honorific of the white only having position in society. But, at least everyone has enough even if the Black does not have token racial representation in the schools with a Brown school teacher to make you feel reassured that you got a fair deal on your English assignments but a Black or Brown teacher could not really guarantee a fair grade. An external grading system might help with photocopied exam books like Uni. This is just an idea though. With automation being so total, you cannot imagine every Asian is working full time. They are not but they have a universal minimum income support and their economy is vibrant. You cannot imagine that every European is working. They have a universal minimum income support. The glory of the hope of the favored six figure manufacturing job with all the perks continues in North America although it is seldom seen or heard of in Asia or Europe while everyone in their population has enough to live with dignity on their own and start a family. It seems Brexit is a running from a non-racialised Anglo present and future. Brexit is not English or European but a "amIWhiteenoughshit." You cant really leave though as a rogue EU state. You are Bosnia in the 1990's as charged for ethnic cleansing. The EU changed its mind. You can't leave. Where are you going? You don't feel at home selling off your car brands to German companies and Asian companies. Is that it! You want to go home to Swaziland or Guyana as a 2nd or 3rd generation white and find yourself before you enjoy the opportunity of wealth and the free movement of goods in your Commonwealth with a universal minimum income support for all Commonwealth nations. How is Fort Mcmurray a mass unmarked burial ground for undesirables who are apparently not legally dead if you kept their brain only alive as a "grammerly" customer service rep or writing assistant or cyber journalist? The human rights records and poor water quality in the Thames Valley since Johnson's mayoral office means we have to think about the bargain we are in and whose taxes pay for his High wire stunts, whose taxes and sales taxes pay for the whole business of politics and attention seeking behaviour. We don't know if he stole a Black man's exam books to Sign them and make them feel like his own or spit on them but why is it that some people can't get a job where they are expected..maybe just to serve chicken? Maybe you don't have to actually write exams at the University of Shireford so long as you fit in, got the look and you are given the Authority and that's okay. But, you certainly write your exams at Oxbridge. But, why make an actual graduate from another school somewhere beside or below your illustrious alma mater a focal point of your hegemony and authority; like he's some kind of biblical character running from some Babylonian occupying King where the King could just hire people just like Abednego was hired by Nebuchadnezzar? Avec petit de le droit en le UDHR , Angletere serait comprend le bon economie.
The American experience that coalesced in the hours and days after the transfer of authority from the English to the Americans in 1787 might have been chaotic or rather innocuous when the people administering order and freedom under the Magna Carta were quite the same English people ancestrally with an innate commitment to serve their community and their King. The new Constitution also had its role to play. Fair and just order is what everybody wanted. Yet, it seems there were some who also wanted to enjoy and approximate the life of a King and take opportunity to do so where they could making decisions over and above the requirements and the legality of the Constitution. What fun would we have if we did not live life and transact business in a way that makes us feel like kings where you dot your T's and cross your I's while the constitution would have us cross our T 's and dot the I's? Constitutions are for the English, some say, and all of these rules that could enslave you one day and free you next week or next month. This tendency to skirt and avoid Constitutional legal obligation has continued to the present day and has filtered into the U.S. attitude towards UN compliance and obligatory commitments on the domestic forefront primarily while treaties are maintained and enforced by US personnel abroad. This is an unusual pattern, throwing the U.S. into turmoil when certain UN and Constitutional commitments are critically necessary for the functioning US economy.
