Posts
Mueller or any prosecutor has the inherent power to "exonerate" by definition as it is the inherent power to decide there is "no reasonable prospect of conviction" concerning the Truehlp campaign or any matter which is what Mueller Or any prosecutor can decide. ex·on·er·ate /iɡˈzänəˌrāt/ Learn to pronounce verb 1. (especially of an official body) absolve (someone) from blame for a fault or wrongdoing, especially after due consideration of the case. "they should exonerate these men from this crime" synonyms: absolve, clear, acquit, declare innocent, find innocent, pronounce not guilty, discharge; More 2. release someone from (a duty or obligation). synonyms: release, discharge, relieve, free, liberate;More --------------------------------- Anything of Value Law and Legal Definition: Anything of value refers to any Goods(food, clothing, shelter, Calvin Jeans, Eternity Cologne) that have a certain utility to the recipient that is real and that is ordinarily not given away free but is purchased. https://definitions.uslegal.com › anyt... Anything of Value Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc. "Information" about opponents or "dirt" is not ---*anything of value* by definition under US Law. Anything of Value Law and Legal Definition.Anything of value refers to any goods that have a certain utility to the recipient that is real and that is ordinarily not given away free but is purchased. https://definitions.uslegal.com › anyt...
"That those who administer justice may work with integrity, and that the injustice which prevails in the world may not have the last word."-The Universal Catholic Prayer Intention for July 2019. America is like a grown man with an ego soo big that he refuses to let his ego risk failure in an exam room or in a relationship. When others are schooled and coached to take the risk and succeed, the grown man with the big ego gets angry and attacks, as if those people are in their ego's way. You want to throw them around like a rag doll resentfully in response to what is communal or family success. You threatened them to pass the exam or die. The issue for the next election is why do North Americans not have equal and comparable UN ILO Regulations r202 requisite universal minimum income support like Europeans or Asians? It's a political exam question. It's a problem that predates the current administration. As such, it's President Truehlp keeping hope alive this time if constitutional and treaty compliance is not automated or if there is no major third party. What we have now is politics where personas are sold to us as being more important than life saving laws and constitutional fulfilment. Is Eva Braun, born in Jamaica, the de facto President of The United States of Oz campaigning to see the hurts of sex operations at birth take power and position and authority over the laws and functionality of our nation, holding it ransom until their hurt is recognised? The message is America is like a creature that's rendered unable to reproduce. You adopt people. You don't produce or fund your own. How difficult could a mandatory minimum of $60000.00 per year per North American citizen really be to fulfil the requisite minimum income support ? The issues for the next election are the same as 2008; government support for automation in manufacturing, minimum income support for the entire population who really are displaced workers and generally the economy. Maybe the people who had eight years from 2008-2016 will have to come back and finish the job. They helped manufacturing with some funds at GM that turned out to be total Toyota ownership in the end. The next step was to implement the minimum income support but the mire of the Democrats' wikileaks held back the Democrats' modern dream team of American politics. But, they still demonstrate their entrenched influence, control and authority over government and the media as they wrote the script for the current presidency, they have Donald drugged up, they suggested he tweet a lot or The secretary would do it. Sometimes it's Ms. Hillary Clenchton or the Joker who hijacks the message. They also decided when they would criticise him for the tweets and just take back the house and maybe move back in early. But, they never really left. They are camped out in the vast expanses of the East wing. Notice how Donald and Mike moved in late. The Democrats took unusually long to move out. In fact, they never did. Can we accept a North American with West Indian, African, Asian and American ancestry running a Law Firm with a bonafide Law degree from Scotland and a White Jamaican or Black Jamaican father; maybe a Black African father? What about a Creole West Indian graduate with a law degree from England? The Creoles are honoured people who make contributions to every honoured aspect of human life all over the entire world. They, like all human beings across the earth, want to see all of North America functional again. It is just that some people believe that if they help white people, white people will help them. But, they seem to think "White" people want a negative balance sheet to follow all White people's preaching and teaching and the donating to the universal truth of our human experience. It's like a black old woman who says she does not want to have a Black West Indian cab driver or she says cartoon characters with both West Indian accents is racist and stereotypical instead of inclusive but she is the first to refuse to support a Black 2nd generation West Indian dentist on the allegation that he does not buy enough West Indian take out food. Your balance sheet says your version of manufacturing with insufficient automation has ended. Your population is on a continual negative growth rate. You have gone through a very practical, basic education involving economics and nation building. */ This is a chance to focus on fundamentals again; like people. What if there's a whiter people telling you to, as white west indians now all over the Western hemisphere to help them kill yourselves and the white people in front of you? You have a solution. Read the ILO Regulations r202. Our war within politics to help Donald to make all of North America functional again is spiritual; not carnal. If white is about dominion, let's say you have it. But, in Jesus' name feed thy sheep. Feed thy sheep. Feed thy people. Dominion is not about destroying life but ensuring and guaranteeing life is fruitful. If "white" is to honor and uphold the laws your father fought and died for with black soldiers in the same army, if "white" is being able to name every Loch or Castle in Scotland or name three hymns from an Anglican hymnal, then white privilege is when you want the privilege but forget about what you honor in being white. Hopefully our leaders have not chosen risky attention grabbing antics and fleeting popularity and sensationalism vs. Successful secure functional policies and public statements with a scantily clad staffer or beauty contestant beside you on the news once in a while. A man born in a car salvage yard may say the UDHR/OHCHR is a bit too much for people before they could understand and know where He came from and Know His experience when you should be grateful. America's not as bad as a car salvage yard; right? Then he says, if you are not happy then go home; ok? The more bewildered the leadership is, the lower the rates of universal minimum income support in any country as well as the sales tax rate. The sales tax rate should be no less than 20 percent. Minimum income support is like health care or food stamps but is provided unconditionally; like health care. Minimum Income Support is a great idea. People will still have jobs; of course. We could still have a sense of white privilege even if every citizen had $30000.00 Universal minimum income support. You could also have overt expressions of hate sent via social media since people make mistakes and short circuit sometimes but not overt expressions of ignorant economic polic wiping out all Americans. We expect neither from our national leaders. The Democrats with Obalma would not have been impeached for such racist and ignorant policies affecting all Americans who were told indirectly not to believe in a bonafide law school graduate or medical graduate. Is the covert message of the government the limitation of our capability if not our dreams? He was rewarded. This is the irony and we look forward to the Constitution breaking out of the shackles put on its universal non-racialised beauty and truth by the Democrats. The nonverbal cues, covert dictations and navigation of white privilege can supersede and take precedence over the virtues of the governing language and culture in any economy when the language or culture in that region is still in gestation and insufficiently grounded. You don't remember all the lochs in Scotland or the names of three Anglican hymns. I think you said you really dont know where you come from and that's ok. You are now Mexican , American or Canadian. A polka dot, black, white, yellow or red President would do, ?however?, so long as we have the requisite universal minimum income support. But, there is something going on. Remember Detective Fanning in the movie "Collateral." In the days and years after a 21st Century Black Presidency, are we seeing the muting of non-racialised human capability as an unofficial, covert compensation reassuring white privilege where we get political participants who are mixed race enough to be any white man's progeny but maybe not qualified enough to be a politician although you dont have to be a graduate to be qualified? What did you have to offer and to whom to get access to your constitutionally protected abilities and freedoms? The final aggregate and cover for white privilege with abuses of power is the joy of seeing the darker complexion in the position and office as a substitute for the actual economic solution that involves the minimum income support and then everybody loses. But, white privilege does not have to be abusive where indirect public apologies are required. White privilege can afford a universal minimum income support. I have no doubt that our system works and every politician is freely elected but our consciences are not free and does the voting when prompted. 2008 was about a domestic solution instead of a perpetual military adventure involving burning oil wells in Iran in addition to the oil wells The world's problems are best addressed by a king of some great culture, maybe England; not a journalist or lowly law graduate and lecturer. were already on fire and burning in Iraq. Yet, the world's problems are best addressed by a king of some great culture, maybe England; not a journalist or lowly law graduate and lecturer. The Asian countries have shown us their faith and belief in economics with the quality and standard of the lives of their people. No group of countries have made a greater commitment to economics and aggressive capitalism with aggressive automation and a full commitment to universal minimum income support in contrast to the absence of commitment by Anglo nations. Your economics is like your religion. You preach it but you do not show your faith by your works. Economies need people with money. You don't understand this. The Asians do. Economies also need the most efficient manufacturing methods that involves full automation. Full automation reduces the number of people with a regular stable cash flow. Turnover, sales and profit will disappear without sufficient citizens already in the economy with some back up minimum income support cash. If not, you need people newly introduced to the economy with cash; maybe foreign citizens with a universal minimum income support when local citizens are required to be given the universal minimum income support. As Anglo manufacturing and products disappear and are less prevalent as replaced by more competitive Asian products made with full automation, the Anglo people all over the world are replaced by Asian people as the Anglos are more susceptible to the attrition occasioned with life outside of a universal minimum income support. The Asians have more money on average pursuant to their Asian universal minimum income support paid to Asian citizens by Asian governments pursuant to the UDHR , OHCHR and the ILO Regulations R202. It follows the belief, programme and purposes of habeas corpus rights in modern democracies and economies eschewed by pirate and scallawag descendant populations. It is their culture to seek and express the power to take human life outside of the authority of a Lawful Court. As such, You don't have any consistent programme to preserve your population, preserve your occupation of territory and extend your influence and occupation of territory in other parts of the world. This Universal minimum income support is based on English economic principles distilled from Sir Thomas More, Adam Smith and Marcus Aurelius. You are trying to fulfil instead of Hesitating or resisting to implement the universal minimum income support policy in full as you say you believe you have several policies that satisfy the guranteed, ensured mandate when summed or in aggregate. Yet, look at the metrics. Your Government and its population is in a self induced biblical famine. But, your own evidence demonstrates that there is a failure and a shortcoming while you enforce the minimum income support policies in Afghanistan, Libya now also and Iraq. Is it the Afro? It couldnt be the Afro when Afghans and Libyan and Iraqis have Afros. Why don't we make Muslim School mandatory for every West Indian and African North American up to the age of 70. Nobody would tell the Difference. If there is a segment of people in America who resist the minimum income support being given to Black Christian Anglos, not Muslims, then the Black Anglos can be coded as UN funded citizens in North America ( Canada, United States , Mexico) and the UN will pay the bill for those citizens who could be third generation Nigerian African Muslims or Algerians. ILO Recommendations 202 state the following; "4. Members should, in accordance with national circumstances, establish as quickly as possible and maintain their social protection floors comprising basic social security guarantees. The guarantees should ensure at a minimum that, over the life cycle, all in need have access to essential health care and to basic income security which together secure effective access to goods and services defined as necessary at the national level. 5. The social protection floors referred to in Paragraph 4 should comprise at least the following basic social security guarantees: (a) access to a nationally defined set of goods and services, constituting essential health care, including maternity care, that meets the criteria of availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality; (b) basic income security for children, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, providing access to nutrition, education, care and any other necessary goods and services; (c) basic income security, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, for persons in active age who are unable to earn sufficient income, in particular in cases of sickness, unemployment, maternity and disability; and (d) basic income security, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, for older persons. 6. Subject to their existing international obligations, Members should provide the basic social security guarantees referred to in this Recommendation to at least all residents and children, as defined in national laws and regulations." The definition of national residency follows the standard criteria. For example, you have residential ties with Canada if you have a Canadian passport; The most important thing to consider when determining your residency status in Canada for is whether or not you maintain, or you establish, residential ties with Canada. Significant residential ties to Canada include: a home in Canada a spouse or common-law partner in Canada dependants in Canada Secondary residential ties that may be relevant include: personal property in Canada, such as a car or furniture social ties in Canada, such as memberships in Canadian recreational or religious organizations economic ties in Canada, such as Canadian bank accounts or credit cards a Canadian driver's licence a Canadian passport health insurance with a Canadian province or territory To determine residence status, all of the relevant facts in each case must be considered, including residential ties with Canada and length of time, object, intent, and continuity while living inside and outside Canada. The information above is general in nature. Are you asking people in North America to vote in an election before you guarantee and ensure their UDHR and OHCHR rights as they are ensured for citizens in other G20 countries with universal minimum income support? Benjamin Franklin began his life as a captive of the law. But, we are all captives of the law. The Espionage Act 1917 ended the Democratic campaign in 2016 with a legal disqualification of the candidate. Arguing with law and limitations imposed by constitutions may be a part of a covert American temperament. Maybe you would be almost willing to kill or offer half your life to be free of law and never be a captive of it again with some facade of legality called the U.S. Constitution as far as you are concerned. Yet, you were free under Somerset vs. Stewart. This is law. You are also free and financially enabled universally under the UDHR OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations r202. As and when it is enforced, you would not have to resort to...??? The North American or U.S. national temperament and tendency to resist law may be your undoing when the law is not enslaving you or indenturing you but enabling you to enjoy the robotified age as the producer or consumer of robotically made goods with the enforcement of a universal minimum income support. It's absence is genocide; a very simple legal term that involves a government creating conditions of life that fall below the UDHR and OHCHR standard that call for guranteed, ensured standards of life. Other countries are handsomely, intelligently, efficiently and decisively guaranteeing and ensuring the OHCHR and UDHR with a universal minimum income support with the approach outlined in the UN's ILO Regulations R202. You could think of universal minimum income support as an on-going government bailout for the entire manufacturing sector, reducing the wage and pension burden. Universal minimum income support is the fiscal responsibility that generates significant economic activity and attracts more sales taxable transactions so that there is national revenue to finance more F22's or F-15x's that can fly all day; on hydrogen with a fuel cell. It is a global self esteem race and a people race; not an arms race primarily and for the arms race to be possible, you need the economy that will produce sufficient revenue and for the arms race to be logical, you need a safe,secure people. The Russians won the self esteem race and the Arms race a long time ago with their universal minimum income support of $20,000 00 dating hack to 1940. It is $50,000.00 today but they say it's only $20,000.00. But you must have the real data at one of your think tanks or at the Central Library if no where else. The universal minimum income support is provided to all citizens regardless of complexion. But, you argue. You spend more educating people than you do on the population after graduation when the people are now needed as economic participants. Every person in America or the West Indies who is a casualty of the self esteem war waged against your own population affects the virtue of the entire enterprise when there is a national ODHR obligation and a national OHCHR obligation. But, you are waging the self-esteem war against your own population and it is evident when people from Africa show up or from Asia, Russia or Europe. It is evident when citizens cannot enjoy their freedoms in the age of Bidden or their constitutional pursuit of happiness with whatever education they may have obtained. You lost the debate on virtue and an apple pie for $4.00 at an American supermarket is really not enough to win the virtue war or mask the failure Donald Truehelp is being asked to resolve or that Bidden may work to obscure for his unusual political cadre One more time by dialling back the issue of universal minimum income support to instead microwave cook, reheat and re-serve to the public the issues of race, bussing and integration as a hedge against the discussion on minimum social protection floors. Maybe universal minimum income support will eventually enter the prepared speeches and debates and new discussions centred on the true probability of the Democrats return to the White House if they take over the commitment to fulfil this national obligation for the ultimate political game-set and match if there is no Green Party or Constitution Party to do it. Sadly, the Democrats control and influence of only one or two media outlets has turned politics since 1992 into something that is 90 percent show business and 10 percent reflective of the constitution. What you get is attention grabbing policies that take from the population more than they give. But, the obligation to the North American people in the middle of a robotified future is evident in the early morning of the year 2020. Ontario will be Francophone. They will have a universal minimum income support. You can get those $4.00 Apple pies in Shanghai. Medicaid is universal. Affordable Care is not. Thankfully, Medicaid is not repealed. It is a no frills system. Affordable Care provides chocolates and flowers affordably for a reasonable rate in a Federal program but there seems to be some devil in the detail just as there is a devil of ignorance and stubbornness running through the current political debate. The Asian countries have shown us their faith and belief in economics with the quality and standard of the lives of their people. No group of countries have made a greater commitment to economics and aggressive capitalism with aggressive automation and a full commitment to universal minimum income support in contrast to the absence of commitment by Anglo nations. Your economics is like your religion. You preach it but you do not show your faith by your works. Economies need people with money. You don't understand this. Economies also need the most efficient manufacturing methods that involves full automation. Full automation reduces the number of people with a regular stable cash flow. Turnover, sales and profit will disappear without sufficient people being reintroduced to the economy with cash; maybe foreign citizens. As Anglo manufacturing and products disappear and are less prevalent as replaced by more competitive Asian products made with full automation, the Anglo people all over the world are replaced by Asian people as the Anglos are more susceptible to the attrition occasioned with life outside of a universal minimum income support. The Asians have more money on average pursuant to their Asian universal minimum income support paid to Asian citizens by Asian governments pursuant to the UDHR , OHCHR and the ILO Regulations R202. It follows the belief, programme and purposes of habeas corpus rights in modern democracies and economies eschewed by pirate and scallawag descendant populations. It is their culture to seek and express the power to take human life outside of the authority of a Lawful Court. As such, You don't have any consistent programme to preserve your population, preserve your occupation of territory and extend your influence and occupation of territory in other parts of the world. This Universal minimum income support is based on English economic principles distilled from Sir Thomas More, Adam Smith and Marcus Aurelius. Hesitating or resisting to implement the universal minimum income support policy in full as you say you believe you have several policies that satisfy the guranteed, ensured mandate when summed. But, your own evidence demonstrates that there is a failure and a shortcoming while you enforce the policies in Afghanistan, Libya now also and Iraq. Is it the Afro? It couldnt be the Afro when Afghans and Libyan and Iraqis have Afros. Why don't we make Muslim School mandatory for every West Indian and African North American up to the age of 70. Nobody would tell the Difference. The UN ILO Recommendations 202 state the following; "4. Members should, in accordance with national circumstances, establish as quickly as possible and maintain their social protection floors comprising basic social security guarantees. The guarantees should ensure at a minimum that, over the life cycle, all in need have access to essential health care and to basic income security which together secure effective access to goods and services defined as necessary at the national level. 5. The social protection floors referred to in Paragraph 4 should comprise at least the following basic social security guarantees: (a) access to a nationally defined set of goods and services, constituting essential health care, including maternity care, that meets the criteria of availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality; (b) basic income security for children, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, providing access to nutrition, education, care and any other necessary goods and services; (c) basic income security, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, for persons in active age who are unable to earn sufficient income, in particular in cases of sickness, unemployment, maternity and disability; and (d) basic income security, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, for older persons. 6. Subject to their existing international obligations, Members should provide the basic social security guarantees referred to in this Recommendation to at least all residents and children, as defined in national laws and regulations." The definition of national residency follows the standard criteria. For example, you have residential ties with Canada if you have a Canadian passport; The most important thing to consider when determining your residency status in Canada for is whether or not you maintain, or you establish, residential ties with Canada. Significant residential ties to Canada include: a home in Canada a spouse or common-law partner in Canada dependants in Canada Secondary residential ties that may be relevant include: personal property in Canada, such as a car or furniture social ties in Canada, such as memberships in Canadian recreational or religious organizations economic ties in Canada, such as Canadian bank accounts or credit cards a Canadian driver's licence a Canadian passport health insurance with a Canadian province or territory To determine residence status, all of the relevant facts in each case must be considered, including residential ties with Canada and length of time, object, intent, and continuity while living inside and outside Canada. The information above is general in nature. Are you asking people in North America to vote in an election before you guarantee and ensure their UDHR and OHCHR rights as they are ensured for citizens in other G20 countries with universal minimum income support? Benjamin Franklin began his life as a captive of the law. But, we are all captives of the law. The Espionage Act 1917 ended the Democratic campaign in 2016 with a legal disqualification of the candidate. Arguing with law and limitations imposed by constitutions may be a part of a covert American temperament. Maybe you would be almost willing to kill or offer half your life to be free of law and never be a captive of it again with some facade of legality called the U.S. Constitution as far as you are concerned. Yet, you were free under Somerset vs. Stewart. This is law. You are also free and financially enabled universally under the UDHR OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations r202. As and when it is enforced, you would not have to resort to...??? The North American or U.S. national temperament and tendency to resist law may be your undoing when the law is not enslaving you or indenturing you but enabling you to enjoy the robotified age as the producer or consumer of robotically made goods with the enforcement of a universal minimum income support. It's absence is genocide; a very simple legal term that involves a government creating conditions of life that fall below the UDHR and OHCHR standard that call for guranteed, ensured standards of life. Other countries are handsomely, intelligently, efficiently and decisively guaranteeing and ensuring the OHCHR and UDHR with a universal minimum income support with the approach outlined in the UN's ILO Regulations R202. You could think of universal minimum income support as an on-going government bailout for the entire manufacturing sector, reducing the wage and pension burden. Universal minimum income support is the fiscal responsibility that generates significant economic activity and attracts more sales taxable transactions so that there is national revenue to finance more F22's or F-15x's that can fly all day; on hydrogen with a fuel cell. It is a global self esteem race and a people race; not an arms race primarily and for the arms race to be possible, you need the economy that will produce sufficient revenue and for the arms race to be logical, you need a safe,secure people. The Russians won the self esteem race and the Arms race a long time ago with their universal minimum income support of $20,000 00 dating hack to 1940. It is $50,000.00 today but they say it's only $20,000.00. But you must have the real data at one of your think tanks or at the Central Library if no where else. The universal minimum income support is provided to all citizens regardless of complexion. But, you argue. You spend more educating people than you do on the population after graduation when the people are now needed as economic participants. Every person in America or the West Indies who is a casualty of the self esteem war waged against your own population affects the virtue of the entire enterprise when there is a national ODHR obligation and a national OHCHR obligation. But, you are waging the self-esteem war against your own population and it is evident when people from Africa show up or from Asia, Russia or Europe. It is evident when citizens cannot enjoy their freedoms in the age of Bidden or their constitutional pursuit of happiness with whatever education they may have obtained. You lost the debate on virtue and an apple pie for $4.00 at an American supermarket is really not enough to win the virtue war or mask the failure Donald Truehelp is being asked to resolve or that Bidden may work to obscure for his unusual political cadre One more time by dialling back the issue of universal minimum income support to instead microwave cook, reheat and re-serve to the public the issues of race, bussing and integration as a hedge against the discussion on minimum social protection floors. Maybe universal minimum income support will eventually enter the prepared speeches and debates and new discussions centred on the true probability of the Democrats return to the White House if they take over the commitment to fulfil this national obligation for the ultimate political game-set and match if there is no Green Party or Constitution Party to do it. Sadly, the Democrats control and influence of only one or two media outlets has turned politics since 1992 into something that is 90 percent show business and 10 percent reflective of the constitution. What you get is attention grabbing policies that take from the population more than they give. But, the obligation to the North American people in the middle of a robotified future is evident in the early morning of the year 2020. Ontario will be Francophone. They will have a universal minimum income support. You can get those $4.00 Apple pies in Shanghai. Medicaid is universal. Affordable Care is not. Thankfully, Medicaid is not repealed. It is a no frills system. Affordable Care provides chocolates and flowers affordably for a reasonable rate in a Federal program but there seems to be some devil in the detail just as there is some devil in the Democratic national stratagem for America and it's future. Now, if you shake hands with people at exciting G8 and G20 summits before and after you sign the UDHR, the OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations 202, maybe you do respect those people and you will comply for no other reason. You are like a woman who says she needs to be accepted but who cuts the cheek of her children and then blames them for how she feels about herself. Benjamin Franklin was a second generation indentured servant born to people who came over from Europe. He was a home grown colonial. He actually worked for Anthony Johnson. Bidden and Donald Truhelp are descendants of Benjamin Franklin. Fortunately, American socio-economic policy is officially the UDHR and the OHCHR with further amplification provided by the ILO Regulations R202 as signed by the Bidden Obalma government but in spite of official policy, the leadership does not enforce this policy at home. It enforces the policy in Africa, Iraq and Afghanistan as now every African nation has a minimum income support of $15,000.00 per year. The West Indian Caricom nations have $10000.00 for every registered citizen who is resident or non-resident as some are overseas in America or Europe operating Jerk Chicken takeout restaurants. The American leadership seems to be intent and fixated on one goal that is to say what they are not; that is to say not Black or not a former indentured servant instead of saying he is an industrialist, business owner and an economically literate person who understands the purpose of the policy and that even if every North American had $40000.00 universal minimum income support, there will still be inequality, class and the rich who will only be richer vs. the humble little American. The goal to say what they are not challenges their expectations of success. They bring 1000's of Africans, East Indians and Asians to America every year. Because of the covert, divisive , subconscious goals or vendettas of the leadership class, certain policies are unusually delayed. The population spends more time dying together in proximity to the constitution instead of living together as a people given the benefit of the mandatory universal minimum income support under the constitution when automation speeds up production and increases economic output while slowing down economic activity as the average worker has less work and less money to spend due to fewer Job opportunities. The universal minimum income support shields the worker and the economy from the slowdown in economic activity caused by automation. The universal minimum income support is simple fiscal responsibility, enabling the economy. $500.00 -$1000.00 per month as a direct cash supplement or as a credit is not enough to satisfy global fiscal responsibility or national budgetary requirements. But, those low figures are what you would quote to win an American election since the goal is not responsibility but bringing attention to the persona that hoped to be recognised finally as having the authority. This is the beltway that keeps America on the periphery of its constitution and unevolved as a nation but determined with the mindset of a housekeeper that never really owned the house they were maintaining but occupied it with a tinge of short Circuiting and disloyalty as seen in the case of the Democrats most pointedly with the owner overseas. But, this is one nation under God. Your mindset seems to be to dissociate yourself fem the people while offering to chastise punish them for the....kings of kings...in Asia or Europe maybe...I don't know but you seem to think someone is approving of you if you do. The kings are asking you implement the universal minimum income support so that their economies with your economy will see more car sales and food sales. Who told you to think of yourself as the punisher? Instead of the fiscal responsibility, the leadership class is busy confirming that they are not black and that they are powerful as descendants of Benjamin Franklin so that Benjamin Franklin would be recognised; that he had the authority to make arrangement so that every President would be his descendant although he would not sit as President personally. Benjamin Franklin is acknowledged and recognised as being given the authority and to make it feel hereditary maybe will say cutely that I should feel obligated to do anything under any blessed constitution. This may never change. It is not intended to change. But, there at least needs to be a house for the housekeeper to use as a pedestal for recognition; a nation for the housekeeper,a stage for the court jester to have that sense of kingly ancestral, hereditary right just once and to do that you need to be reasonably fiscally responsible even if you put the owner's property in debt with a reverse mortgage owing the Bank of China or the Bank of Korea. You need people. You need to buy trains that save fuel on a 2 for 1 basis and a universal minimum income support like all other nations so that you have sufficient economic activity. Google and Read the "ILO Regulations r202." Benjamin Franklin had the same complexion as Anthony Johnson but Benjamin's hair was soft. Benjamin was born in Jamaica but was always told to say he was born in America. He may have been born female. The research demonstrates a female pelvic bone. What is the point of education if your dna has the authority? Don't the educated just kiss and touch each other in secret in a big old building with a steeple? According to Benjamin, Shouldn't people offer like Benjamin before they are allowed in the hall ? Do they really write 8 or more exams with Latin terminology like Res Ipsa Loquitur ? Maybe the point is to run from law, constitutions and formality in the same way Benjamin Franklin ran from Anthony Johnson once while maintaining a window dressing of order; a semblance and pretence of normalcy. What is the point of Alexander Hamilton and his concerns about unscrupulous men if my dna has the authority and they should not make it soo obvious though, study a bit more and read the ILO Regulations R202 or else I will be very cross with them ? Did you know a P and O Ferry would only take six hours to sail from New York to Nigeria? If the issue is identity for the leadership classes who tend to be related to some founding fathers who were once owned by a Black man like Anthony Johnson, then we accept this. But, every soul born in America by the year 1865 was part Amerindian. Every American really is part Amerindian. It may be hard to believe, but it's true. It could be Chihuahua people dna or Pueblos people dna or Mohican dna or Mohicanapanese. some devil in the Democratic national stratagem for America and it's future. Now, if you shake hands with people at exciting G8 and G20 summits before and after you sign the UDHR, the OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations 202, maybe you do respect those people and you will comply for no other reason. You are like a woman who says she needs to be accepted but who cuts the cheek of her children and then blames them for how she feels about herself. Benjamin Franklin was a second generation indentured servant born to people who came over from Europe. He was a home grown colonial. He actually worked for Anthony Johnson. Bidden and Donald Truhelp are descendants of Benjamin Franklin. Fortunately, American socio-economic policy is officially the UDHR and the OHCHR with further amplification provided by the ILO Regulations R202 as signed by the Bidden Obalma government but in spite of official policy, the leadership does not enforce this policy at home. It enforces the policy in Africa, Iraq and Afghanistan as now every African nation has a minimum income support of $15,000.00 per year. The West Indian Caricom nations have $10000.00 for every registered citizen who is resident or non-resident as some are overseas in America or Europe operating Jerk Chicken takeout restaurants. The American leadership seems to be intent and fixated on one goal that is to say what they are not; that is to say not Black or not a former indentured servant instead of saying he is an industrialist, business owner and an economically literate person who understands the purpose of the policy and that even if every North American had $40000.00 universal minimum income support, there will still be inequality, class and the rich who will only be richer vs. the humble little American. The goal to say what they are not challenges their expectations of success. They bring 1000's of Africans, East Indians and Asians to America every year. Because of the covert, divisive , subconscious goals or vendettas of the leadership class, certain policies are unusually delayed. The population spends more time dying together in proximity to the constitution instead of living together as a people given the benefit of the mandatory universal minimum income support under the constitution when automation speeds up production and increases economic output while slowing down economic activity as the average worker has less work and less money to spend due to fewer Job opportunities. The universal minimum income support shields the worker and the economy from the slowdown in economic activity caused by automation. The universal minimum income support is simple fiscal responsibility, enabling the economy. $500.00 -$1000.00 per month as a direct cash supplement or as a credit is not enough to satisfy global fiscal responsibility or national budgetary requirements. But, those low figures are what you would quote to win an American election since the goal is not responsibility but bringing attention to the persona that hoped to be recognised finally as having the authority. This is the beltway that keeps America on the periphery of its constitution and unevolved as a nation but determined with the mindset of a housekeeper that never really owned the house they were maintaining but occupied it with a tinge of short Circuiting and disloyalty as seen in the case of the Democrats most pointedly with the owner overseas. But, this is one nation under God. Your mindset seems to be to dissociate yourself fem the people while offering to chastise punish them for the....kings of kings...in Asia or Europe maybe...I don't know but you seem to think someone is approving of you if you do. The kings are asking you implement the universal minimum income support so that their economies with your economy will see more car sales and food sales. Who told you to think of yourself as the punisher? Instead of the fiscal responsibility, the leadership class is busy confirming that they are not black and that they are powerful as descendants of Benjamin Franklin so that Benjamin Franklin would be recognised; that he had the authority to make arrangement so that every President would be his descendant although he would not sit as President personally. Benjamin Franklin is acknowledged and recognised as being given the authority and to make it feel hereditary maybe will say cutely that I should feel obligated to do anything under any blessed constitution. This may never change. It is not intended to change. But, there at least needs to be a house for the housekeeper to use as a pedestal for recognition; a nation for the housekeeper,a stage for the court jester to have that sense of kingly ancestral, hereditary right just once and to do that you need to be reasonably fiscally responsible even if you put the owner's property in debt with a reverse mortgage owing the Bank of China or the Bank of Korea. You need people. You need to buy trains that save fuel on a 2 for 1 basis and a universal minimum income support like all other nations so that you have sufficient economic activity. Google and Read the "ILO Regulations r202." Benjamin Franklin had the same complexion as Anthony Johnson but Benjamin's hair was soft. Benjamin was born in Jamaica but was always told to say he was born in America. He may have been born female. The research demonstrates a female pelvic bone. What is the point of education if your dna has the authority? Don't the educated just kiss and touch each other in secret in a big old building with a steeple? According to Benjamin, Shouldn't people offer like Benjamin before they are allowed in the hall ? Do they really write 8 or more exams with Latin terminology like Res Ipsa Loquitur ? Maybe the point is to run from law, constitutions and formality in the same way Benjamin Franklin ran from Anthony Johnson once while maintaining a window dressing of order; a semblance and pretence of normalcy. What is the point of Alexander Hamilton and his concerns about unscrupulous men if my dna has the authority? They should not make it soo obvious though, study a bit more and read the ILO Regulations R202 or else I will be very cross with them. Did you know a P and O Ferry would only take six hours to sail from New York to Nigeria? If the issue is identity for the leadership classes who tend to be related to some founding fathers who were once owned by a Black man like Anthony Johnson, then we accept this. But, every soul born in America by the year 1865 was part Amerindian. Every American really is part Amerindian. It may be hard to believe, but it's true. It could be Chihuahua people dna or Pueblos people dna or Mohican dna or Mohicanapanese. .
Race is just a Maypole for the country to dance around in mass distraction and maybe everybody in the discussion is guilty for needing to be accepted. Did you notice how you can't drag certain people downwards into such meaningless, pointless but heated distracting discussions? I think President TruHelp is someone who is tired of being asked where is he really from and $100.00 on a bet says he has been asked more than once and not offensively. But, as it is, everybody in certain parts of America maybe as people north of Virginia are more likely to be hyphenated Americans but maybe not so likely in Virginia or Maryland. Maybe the non-hyphenated Americans pretend to be Hyphenated Americans since it helps to have a sub culture or sub community with a Maurizio, Saul, Marsawi(good to know you Bob...you fellow alumni and son of a goat), a Sze, a Paddy, a Habanero, a Kente Marley or a Thisishis Fakhrys that can override the occasional bad "melting pot" milkshake that neglects the fulfilment of the UDHR Article 25 or the OHCHR in the main "McDonald's" culture figuratively speaking. Maybe the people who seek to live in America are really the DNA of Native Americans who were moved secretly and forcibly to other parts of the world and rebranded with European, African, Asian, Latin American Spanish languages or West Indian accents. They are American but now seek to accepted and "need" to be accepted as American. If we can all get beyond the ancestral need or the childish "needing" to be accepted as American, then we can get to the issue at hand that seems to be our very blood life that is to be financed with the universal minimum income support that appears to be on offer to the devil of national subjugation in exchange for a little power and attention once to the benefit of some who "don't want to remember nothing" like Cypher says in Matrix; the movie. The country is tied up in a cobweb of words centred on racism also known as "idiotism." But, the Map to get out of the web or the knife to cut through the webs of words is the UN ILO Regulations R202 that is part of Domestic law. The U.S. is a signatory and the UN ILO Regulations are a part of Domestic law through Article Six of the Constitution. Death and life is in the power of the Tongue. Speak life. Speak about the UN ILO Regulations R202. Some people are tired of feeling left behind or backward in their own country with an Asian or Afghan beside us soaked in and basking in the love and universal minimum income support provided by their own nation as we protect these guests standing on the subway platforms waiting with us or lining up beside us at McDonald's in North America. The North Americans(Canadians, Mexicans and Americans) need to bask in the same love and universal minimum income support provided by their governments. Maybe all of the hyphenated communities are seeking an opportunity to show America what culture really is; what family is also and community. Maybe "needing" to be Accepted is a bad habit and is certainly something we expect everyone but new immigrants to participate in. They are not considered social competition if you notice. Also, their personal self-concept and self identities are sufficiently secure as not to seek acceptance behind the high, sanctimonious walls of a foreign language also. Let us remember that the current debate on race began with an accusation directed at the President. His response if it was his response was just "white trash, garbage; not American, irresponsible " and regrettable; not what you would expect of a man who sat with the Emperors, Kings and Queens of this world. O don't think he wrote it. It lacked a pattern of his maturity and cautiousness in writing if not in speech.
